World's Fair Exhibitions: A Rhetorical Analysis

997 Words2 Pages

The turn of the 19th century brought upon a number of theorists both inside and outside the realms of anthropology to think critically about the discourses of powers that exist between colonialism and museum exhibitions. In the late 19th century and into the early 20th century, World’s Fair Exhibitions captivated the world with their grandiose architectural structures such as the London Crystal Palace and beyond. These exhibitions showcased not only the intellectual property of the West, but it also displayed cultural communities outside of their system of which they deemed to be “exotic” or foreign to the “advanced civilizations of the West.” This rhetoric turned the colonized into commodities by the colonizers, which not only depreciated their cultural value but also said a lot about the personality of the West so to speak. One theorist in specific that …show more content…

Also, this essay mentions that premise that museums in some way shape or form, manage to remove cultures and the objects displayed from their historical and spatial contexts. This is a direct result of the phenomenon of American / European industrialization and cultural appropriation across global markets during this time. Many of these issues still exist in our capitalist economic venues today. One section that I found to be particularly interesting was Hinsley’s mention of Frederick Putnam director and curator of the Peabody Museum at Harvard University regarding the Committee of Liberal Arts in Chicago 1891. Putnam explained that the Columbian Exposition solely exists as a result of the “voyage of Columbus 400 years ago that lead to the discovery of the Americas by our race, its subsequent peopling by the Europeans and consequent development of great nations on the

Open Document