Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The communication between leader and follower
Weaknesses in servant leadership
Weaknesses in servant leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The communication between leader and follower
Winston Churchill is an example of a secular leader who has applied the principles of servant leadership (Hardy, 2010). Winston Church, a highly influential world leader, served as Prime Minister of Britain from 1940-1945 and again from 1951-1955 (Spencer, 2016). Researcher Benjamin Hardy (2010) observes the importance Churchill's trustworthiness, foresight, and commitment to the British people during the turbulent years of the Second World War. He also was skilled orator who gained the trust of the people of Britain and provided a vision of freedom, hope and unity for the country during the troubled wartime years (2010). The transformational leadership theory developed by J.M. Burns (1978) has some similarities with the servant leader model and also important differences. Transformational leadership was first identified with …show more content…
Burns, Leadership (Riggio, 2009). In Burns' model, transformational leadership is distinguished by four qualities – inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration, and idealized influence (2009). The relationship between leader and follower is based intrinsic value rather than extrinsic reward and, as writer Robert Riggio (2009) notes, "transformational leaders go beyond mere charisma and strive to develop meaningful interpersonal relationships". Importantly, transformational leaders are at once visionary and morally compelling (Seligman, 1980). Their leadership instills widespread satisfaction, commitment and loyalty among followers (Riggio, 2009). The key concepts of motivation, inspiration and individualized development make transformational leaders highly influential (cite) and, because of their success as leaders, are also
...selbein and Cohen, “organizations that take the time to teach leadership are far ahead of the competition. By becoming familiar with the transformational leadership approach and combining the four I's, managers can become effective leaders in the business world.” (1999, p. 263). Transformational leadership can be applied in one-on-one or group situations. Using this approach, the manager (leader) and the associates (followers) are “transformed” to enhance job performance and help the organization be more productive and successful. All of these leaders have the attributes mentioned here. History will decide the greater impact they had on society as it is being written every day. Therefore, the qualities of transformational leadership make the essence of transformational management and the key to successful management of transformational organizational changes.
According to Riggio (2009), the most popular theory of leadership is transformational. Many believe that these leaders get the job done through inspiring, modeling, and helping others develop their skills as leaders. Research provides clear evidence that groups lead by transformational leaders have higher levels of performance and satisfaction than groups led by other types of leaders (Riggio, 2009). Clear communication is vital to transformational leadership and in order to succeed further, one will need to work on their own skills, and set aside time and space for personal development (Manktelow, 2005).
James McGregor Burns was one of the first people to come up with a definition of transformational leadership (Bromley). Transformational leadership is great, but Burns made a quote in his book Leadership that should be recognized, “The aim of leadership is not to just reach a goal, but also transform leaders and followers into better, more self-actualized leaders” (Komives and Wagner). This quote really explains what leadership means to me, not only as a person leading a group, but also learning how to follow as well.
Transformational leadership theory conceptualized in the late 1970’s, proposed that leaders could motivate followers through shared vision and mutual interest to uplift the entire organization to a higher morality (Burns, 1978). Morality was defined as leaders and followers working together to fulfill organizational goals and achieve higher performances within a context of change and innovation. Leaders would surpass their own self-interest, in order to, foresee, foster, and indoctrinate a new organizational vision to their followers. Bass operationalized Burns’ seminal work into a leadership model to better indentify transformational leadership characteristics. The model emphasized four dimensions such as idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration in order to achieve success.
According to Bass’s (2003) conceptualization, transformational leadership consists of charisma, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation, and individualized consideration.
Transformational leadership consists of few components which are idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration, management by exception and contingent rewards (Ahmad et al.,
In this time of transition and uncertainty, research suggests that transformational leadership is highly effective (Straight, 2006). Leadership research has drifted from emphasis on the competence of leaders to “manage change” to the ability to “transform” organizations. Transformational leaders have attributes and behaviors needed to successfully motivate and empower employees. According to Bernard Bass (1990), transformational leadership occurs when a leader transforms, or changes, his or her followers in three important ways that together result in followers trusting the leader, performing behaviors that contribute to the achievement of organizational goals, and being motivated to perform at a high level. Transformational leaders can achieve greater performance by stimulating innovative ways of thinking and transforming follower’s beliefs and aspirations. Maxwell (Maxwell, 2007) articulates that most of the time, influence is more important than formal power or authority. I agree with him. Influence is very important in organizational and co...
In the ideal form, transformational leadership creates valuable and positive change with the end goal of developing followers into leaders. These may include connecting the followers sense of self and identity to the mission and the collective identity of the organization; being a role model for followers that inspires them; challenging followers to take greater pride for their work, and understanding the strengths and weaknesses of individuals, so the leader can associate followers with tasks that improve their performance. Transformational leaders focus on intrinsic motivation and personal development of their followers. They believe in five key aspects of being a leader, which are being creative, interactive, empowering, visionary and
These leaders influence crowds of people who look up to them daily. Identically, transformational leaders care about each individual follower and help them become pro leaders themselves. Their charisma, support and strong speeches assemble encouragement
Tucker, Bruce A. ; Russell, Robert F., “The influence of the transformational leader”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2004. (http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-2375126_ITM) viewed 5.05.2008
Transformational leadership starts with the leader vision, her or his picture of the future that will be the key impetus to motivate others within the team. Steve Jobs, a typically example for a transformational leader, was Ex-CEO and also a Co-founder of Apple. By the time he died, he had built Apple into the world’s most valuable company (Isaacson, 2012). During his period as a leader he sh...
Transformational leaders want individuals to make a positive change in their lives and try to help people apply a positive change on a daily basis. The leaders do this by implementing individual considerations which, according to Kendrick (2011), “treats each follower as a unique contributor and provides coaching, mentoring, feedback and growth opportunities.” This makes such an impact on people because each individual is getting different mentoring, feedback, and growth opportunities due to their unique personality. It is very important for each person to have this because everyone has a different learning ability and motivation. This helps each individual with their own distinctive endeavor.
In the article titled, “Does the Transactional- Transformational Leadership Paradigm Transcend Organization and National Boundaries?” by Bernard M. Bass, Bass addressed the different paradigm of transactional and transformational leadership as well as how other factors influence their effectiveness. He notes that leadership is universal and that there are a lot of of sub-factors in addition to hereditary component, which is about forty percent, that affect one’s capability of becoming an influential leader (Bass, 1997). The part of the article that I personally found very significant is where Bass examines the quality of a transformational leader. According to Bass, leaders who qualified as being a transformational figure was someone who had exceeded Maslow's Hierarchy of needs by achieving self actualization and moved past selfish interest. Similarly, one of the components of a transformational leader according to Bass was “Inspirational Motivation [according to which] leaders articulate an appealing vision of the future, challenge followers with high standards, talk optimistically with enthusiasm, and provide encouragement and meaning for what needs to be done” (Bass, 1997).
A brief description of transformational leadership, according to James MacGregor Burns, is a new paradigm
Transformational leaders birth new transformational leaders. Followers themselves become transformational leaders and a journey of extra mile partnership started.