Whether a Cut in Corp Tax Rate be Beneficial
Doesn’t everyone want to keep what he/she has earned? It has always been somewhat tradition for Americans to work hard for their money, only to see some of it squandered away come tax time. Wouldn’t a tax cut, for some, be like a divine, heavenly grace? As the year 2001 unfolds and George W. Bush begins his presidency, income tax rates have, in fact, become a concern. President Bush is pushing for an income tax bill that will reduce the tax brackets from 15%, 28%, 31%, 36%, and 39.6% to a new bracket in 2006 of 10%, 15%, 25%, and 33%. A cut in individual income taxes would benefit most Americans and is well deserved. However, there is no plan to cut the corporate tax rates yet. A hypothetical decline to the corporate tax rates could spawn a number of possibilities for firms and/or even influence the market. However, will a decline in the corporate tax rate positively influence market volume and different firms’ financial activities (i.e. investing, repurchasing, options)? A question of this nature can be answered through analysis of the benefits or detriments obtained by two companies due to the reduction.
There is a basic relationship between the market volume and corporate tax rates. A decrease in the corporate rates would allow companies to pay less on their earnings, leaving them with more Net Income (NI). With this increase in net income, a company can afford to invest in other areas or it allows them to repurchase their stock. By repurchasing stock, the market volume drops by the amount of stock that has been bought back. In addition, buying back shares can affect the overall outcome of the market that day depending on the company engaging in the repurchase. A company with a large stake in the market who buys back a considerable amount of stock will cause a greater fluctuation in the volume. In buying shares, the overall value of the market will rise due to the price increases that occur. If the opposite occurs, the tax rate is increased; some firms may have different decisions to make. Because an increase in the tax rate affects a company’s net income in a negative manner, funds for operations and other activities will become diminished. With the net income being less significant, a firm may need to participate in a form of either debt or equity financing to obtain funds needed to operate. Upon re...
... middle of paper ...
...is beneficial depends on the company in which the tax cut will be implemented on. For Ford Motor Company, a tax cut might work to their favor. By decreasing the rate, Ford’s return on equity will increase. However, Merck & Co. may hope for a veto of that tax cut. With a cut they would be increasing their cost of debt, in which they have excess financing ($161 billion). They would also lose out on their tax shield from the interest on their debt. Overall, the economy, the market, and the individual sectors seem to be doing well. To tamper with things now would almost certainly throw a wrench into what the Fed has already done to try and stimulate the economy. To follow in the old proverb, “If it isn’t broke then don’t try to fix it.” Benefits and detriments are, in this scenario, purely reliant on the company and its type of business.
Bibliography:
Kim, Yun-Hee. “IntelliCorp Raises $5M In Equity Financing.” Wall Street Journal Interactive.(March 12, 2001).
Lazo, Shirley A. “Bush’s Tax Plan: Dividend Booster.” Wall Street Journal Interactive.(March 12, 2001).
Needles, Anderson, and Caldwell. Principles of Accounting. Princeton, NJ: Houghton Mifflin, 1996 (p.1162).
Many factors of the economy help to indicate certain trends in the tax industry. The Gross Domestic Product has been calculated at an increase of 3.9% the first quarter of 2004. Consumer spending has also increased .4% from the last year. Both of these statistics may indicate an upward trend in the nation’s economy. A consumer may have more disposable income therefore, they may be more apt to spend their extra money on a tax preparation service. This would reveal a positive effect for H&R Block. The unemployment rate has increased nationally while the employment rate is decreasing. This may result in a decrease of the amount of tax returns that H&R Block files annually, due to the amount of taxpayers that have become unemployed. Either these people may have no taxes to file due to their job loss, or they may not have the extra money to pay for a tax preparation service. If a person is out of work then they may have the extra time to file their taxes in their own time.
The tax policy in the United States is very confusing. When the tax policy was originally written in 1913 it was four hundred pages. Now, over the past ninety one years, that tax policy has evolved to over 72,000 pages. Since the tax code has become so lengthy and nearly impossible to understand, the topic of tax reform has been in the minds of many. Although, most barely think about tax reform until tax season. It is a controversial subject due to the impact a change in tax code would have on the American people. The two most popular and widely known stakeholders in this debate are the two major political parties in the United States, the Democrats and the Republicans. The two parties share absolutely no common ground on the subject of tax reform, other than thinking the other parties solution is wrong. The Democrats, in general, want to raise taxes on the wealthy, while Republicans, generally, want to cut taxes for everyone (Democratic Party) (GOP). Unfortunately, with the United States economy currently doing so poorly, the parties can no longer afford to remain at a standstill, some sort of compromise is going to have to be made. The implementation of a flat tax, and discarding the current tax system would be a compromise that both parties can agree on and will simplify the tax code, overall benefiting all Americans.
The largest component of the bill was the $288 billion allocated to tax cuts. Businesses as w...
In Microsoft’s 2004 fiscal year, a 33% increase in net income resulted in a 1% increase in stock price. In the 2005 fiscal year, a 2% gain in net income resulted in a 4% decrease in stock price (Microsoft Inc 2006). As seen, an increase in net income does not automatically lead to an increase in stock price. For growth companies such as Microsoft, stock price is primarily driven by the growth of earnings (25 April 2007).
Because all economic brackets are taxed equally under a flat tax, earning more money is no longer discouraged. Because there are no more marginal tax rates, people will have incentive to work more without worrying that the extra money they make will be taxed higher. It is said that the economy would grow by 5.
Looking at various systems around the world and how they came into existence provide useful comparisons and illuminate how different countries have responded to very similar needs of their citizens as well as how to mitigate limitations and marshal opportunities offered in the diversity of these systems (Johnson & Stoskopf, 2010). This paper analyzes several health systems throughout the world, specifically focusing on Japan, Australia, Germany, Canada, and the United Kingdom and compares how these systems differ from those in the United States.
Bringing about change in an organization is an extremely difficult task especially if it is at every level in the organization. Various methods and models of change have been formulated of which one of the most important method being Kurt Lewin’s 3-step model of change. Organizations change continually whether or not the people in the organization want the change to happen. In some cases the change may be planned while in some other the change will be unplanned (Kuriger, 2004). Bringing about change in an organization is not easy as there are many agents that can resist the process of change. Whenever the management tries to bring about a change in the organization as part of restructuring in the organization, one of the most important issues they face is from the employees who are not ready to accustom and adjust to the new system (Mills et.al, 2008). This resistance to change is difficult to deal with as they resist due to a lot of reasons like fear losing existing power, comfort zone they are in, and fear of losing their job as well.
According to Baack (2012), employees resist change for reasons of self-premium when they understand that levels of influence, cash, esteem, employer stability and individual accommodation are in question (10.4, par 2). Resistance can likewise be founded on just not understanding why a change has gotten to be vital (Covi, n.d.). Whatever the reasons and types of individual resistance to change are, they have negative ramifications to the change’s accomplishment arrangement and in this manner they should be managed productively and with viable system. Also, from the internal of the organization,
Numerous politicians are in favor of reforming the United States tax system to consumption tax. Our basic tax system is tax that the government imposes on all working individuals including businesses. Per law, all workforce women, men, and young adults are required to file an income tax return every year; this can dedicate if they owe any taxes or may be eligible to receive a refund. To determine such taxes owe or refunds, the government utilized a progressive tax system, which higher income earner pays a higher tax rate compared to those who earn a lower less. This tax system is a crucial part or role to the government after all, this is their primary source of funds to support their activities and to serve the public.
More than half of organizational change, however, has ended in failure. The primary reason is not a lack of capacity of the staff or the resource shortage of the enterprise , but the resistance to organizational change. In fact, resistance to change is inevitable as a primary element of change management.
In our world, each country has a set criterion to follow in order to establish health care for people in different societies. The standard of health care received varies from country to country. When you think about health care services around the world, there are so many diverse countries that run health care in different ways. Comparing the United States to other countries such as Canada and Japan is very interesting in the part of how health care is handled. Health care is an important service that touches the daily lives of millions of people at important and vulnerable times; some issues involving health care include those who are covered, source of payment, patient preferences and quality of services.
“Change will not disappear nor dissipate. Technology, civilisations and creative thought will maintain their ever accelerating drive onwards” (Paton and McCalman, 2008, 5). The nature of organisational change can be described as smooth incremental change that occurs slowly and systematically, bumpy incremental change that goes through periods of tranquillity followed by accelerated change as a result from environmental factors or internal re-structures and discontinuous change which are rapid shifts in strategy, structure and culture (Senior and Swailes, 2010). When an organisation starts to change this impacts on the individual level and without the correct collaboration, empowerment and communication from the organisation this can breed resistance from staff to adopt a change (Keep and Ash, 2001).
Human beings have a tendency to resist change even when the change contributes to growth and development, increased productivity, and greater efficiency (Baker, 1989, p.53). In most cases, resistance to change occurs in the workplace because changes in an organization affect the individuals within the organization. Moreover, individuals within an organization resist change because of fear of unknown based on the potential impact of the change on their job performance, relationship with co-workers, and other job related issues.
The CBO reports an expected dramatic drop going into 2011 “...[resulting] largely from unmeasured factors related to the recession and the economy’s slow recovery,” (Congressional Budget Office, 2011:86). Since the CBO anticipates an economic recovery, the expectation for revenue will rise considering that individuals are expected to have more income. Since this individual income is expected to increase, the tax brackets are also estimated to rise. The total share of revenue will increase drastically from 2011...
My mouth watered as my eyes made contact with the food, and at that instance I realized exactly how hungry I was. Like a wild animal, I snatched them from the table and wolfed them down - a bite of the cookie, a drink of the juice, a bite, a drink ... I was subconsciously aware of some juice trickling down my chin, but I didn't do anything about it. I was starving.