Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Flat taxation system or progressive
Flat taxation system or progressive
Cons of flat tax
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Taxation has always been a major controversy. Just like any major corporation, the government is constantly looking to raise revenue. The easiest and fairest way to do this is by taxing the people. However, how the people will be taxed is always an issue.
The current tax system that the United States uses contains several flaws. First of all, it is very complex. It is comprised of many various variables that can create loopholes. These loopholes can cause two equal income families to be paying very different tax rates. In fact, there are 480 different types of tax forms (Website). The current tax system is also very unfair for the wealthy. Because it is a progressive tax, it is higher for people who have higher incomes. People should not be punished for being successful. If a flat tax policy were instituted, then it would simplify the complicated tax system, create fairness within the economy, and promote a desire to thrive financially.
The flat tax would simplify the tax system because instead of filling out a variety of complicated forms, a person would only need to tell the IRS how much money they make, then give the percent of that amount. This would dissolve all of the loopholes that exist within the current system. It would cut back on the opportunities for unethical people to cheat. If the flat tax system were taken, taxpayers would save 94% in compliance costs (Website).
The flat tax will make taxes fair for all people. No matter what race a person is, what social class a person is in, or who they’re friends with, they will end up paying the same rate. Every single taxpayer will have to sacrifice just as much of his or her life as the next person down the road. One of the three main reasons for taxes is to maintain fairness. This is most reasonable ways to maintain fairness. The wealthy will still be paying more money than the poor person, but they both have the same tax burden.
Because all economic brackets are taxed equally under a flat tax, earning more money is no longer discouraged. Because there are no more marginal tax rates, people will have incentive to work more without worrying that the extra money they make will be taxed higher. It is said that the economy would grow by 5.
Our current system of taxation is a varied rate percentage based on different income brackets. Many say that it violates our constitutional rights through unequal taxation. Multiple deductions, loopholes, special rates, and a complex system of regulations all characterize our Federal Income Tax System, prompting many to question why it is still being used (Peters, 2013). The current system although bringing in over $3 trillion, taxes income multiple times, and includes the taxing of estate, labor, savings, and investments (National Priorities Project, 2013). The system itself is complex with over 20,000 pages of regulations, requiring a massive filing system, which is set up and maintained by an even larger IRS, requiring over $225 billion in compliance costs (Hall, 2001). One can be hard pressed to find an advantage in the current system, other than the fact that it provides the government with an enormous amount of funds, and it has...
The tax policy in the United States is very confusing. When the tax policy was originally written in 1913 it was four hundred pages. Now, over the past ninety one years, that tax policy has evolved to over 72,000 pages. Since the tax code has become so lengthy and nearly impossible to understand, the topic of tax reform has been in the minds of many. Although, most barely think about tax reform until tax season. It is a controversial subject due to the impact a change in tax code would have on the American people. The two most popular and widely known stakeholders in this debate are the two major political parties in the United States, the Democrats and the Republicans. The two parties share absolutely no common ground on the subject of tax reform, other than thinking the other parties solution is wrong. The Democrats, in general, want to raise taxes on the wealthy, while Republicans, generally, want to cut taxes for everyone (Democratic Party) (GOP). Unfortunately, with the United States economy currently doing so poorly, the parties can no longer afford to remain at a standstill, some sort of compromise is going to have to be made. The implementation of a flat tax, and discarding the current tax system would be a compromise that both parties can agree on and will simplify the tax code, overall benefiting all Americans.
I. You might have heard politicians in the news, talk about overhauling our tax system with a new fix-all idea, the flat-tax. This would simplify our overly complicated tax system and might seem appealing at first glance, however there are serious problems with it.
18. profitable, efficient, and allow our nation to reach its peak economic 19. growth potential. The flat tax system would end un...
The current tax policy in the United States is very confusing and it is very costly for our government to administer it. It is in the best interest of our country and its citizens to revise or replace our current tax policy.
Double and Triple Taxation Must be Eliminated. President George Bush states that "it's unfair to tax money twice." This statement is actually an example of normative economics and only describes an opinion. It cannot be proven because the term "unfair" is relative to different people; however, not many people would dare to disagree. Especially if the double tax was not aimed only at the large corporations or the richest 10% of the nation, but at every hardworking American who brings home a paycheck.
The United States’ economy, as everyone knows, is not in its best shape. One way the government gains money is by imposing taxes on people. There are many taxes that are placed on different items that the public needs or already has. The United States uses a taxation system which is criticized by many people due to not fully understanding the system. The system used is called progressive tax. However, many people believe the system of flat tax should be the system used for taxing. The progressive taxation system is the best system for the majority of society.
One of the positive economic effects of an increase in indirect taxes is that it may be an incentive to work, this would have positive implication for a country such as Spain who has the 26th highest unemployment rate at 22.7%. A higher VAT rate would cause a fall in real incomes. This could increase the incentives to work if people wish to maintain their standard of living. However indirect taxes can be regressive as taxes can fall more heavily upon the poor than on the rich as
The use of taxes is one of the government's favorite ways to make its presence known in the economy. While this method seems blatantly obvious, many of the ways the government uses the money collected by taxation is not. Some of the money it takes is used to fund other programs designed to "protect" consumers and to "create" jobs. Be...
Three different tax plans: Proportional, Progressive & Regressive Taxes are necessary for every citizen or resident of the United States, not all people agree to pay taxes and the government takes a portion of each person's income. Citizens have to pay taxes they receive necessary services for everyday life such as bookstores, medicine, police, firemen and parks. Even so all these services are given by the government for all people and families pay their taxes there is a difference when paying taxes according to how high the income is. Its a difference percentage between poor, and middle class while rich people. In addition to the article "High-income Americans pay more income taxes, but enough to be 'fair'?"
There has been proposals for a reform for this rate to be at 15%. This reform of 15% would reduce corporate inversions and increase job growth and GDP in the United States. This reform backed by the Republican nominated Donald Trump, would let America “compete with the world and win by cutting the corporate tax rate to 15%, taking our rate from one of the worst to one of the best.” With this flat tax, it will effect both corporate and small business, however small business will benefit the most out of this rate. With small businesses ranging 34% to 39% in taxes, it hurts their income, prohibiting growth and ultimately closing businesses. For the corporate side,
Taxation is a compulsory levy imposed on the income, value of goods and services of individuals, partners and companies by the government. It is can be said to be an approach of imposing tax on the citizen. This imposition of tax, is expected to yield income which should be utilized in the provision of both basic and substantial infrastructural amenities, both social and security, as well as creates conditions for the economic well-being of the society at large.
The progressive tax system is the best out of all three. Progressive taxes tax high-income citizens more than it does compared to low-income citizens. Currently, the United States has a progressive tax system. People who receive an income of $9,275 annually pay 10% income tax, while people who earn a higher income can be taxed up to 40%. The progressive tax system helps low-income citizens by reducing the percentage of tax for those who can't afford to pay the tax.
In conclusion, If this wealth tax is done fairly and logically then it would be a incredibly good solution to bridge the gap between the rich and the poor as well as creating a climate for social reconciliation and substantive equality.
In conclusion, when designing a tax system, we have to consider social and economic tradeoffs. Regulators should first maximize public interest under those limitations. There is no absolute fair tax system. A “successful” tax system will be improved with the test of time and modifications.