Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of organizational change essay
Impact of change in Organizational
Impact of change in Organizational
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of organizational change essay
“Change will not disappear nor dissipate. Technology, civilisations and creative thought will maintain their ever accelerating drive onwards” (Paton and McCalman, 2008, 5). The nature of organisational change can be described as smooth incremental change that occurs slowly and systematically, bumpy incremental change that goes through periods of tranquillity followed by accelerated change as a result from environmental factors or internal re-structures and discontinuous change which are rapid shifts in strategy, structure and culture (Senior and Swailes, 2010). When an organisation starts to change this impacts on the individual level and without the correct collaboration, empowerment and communication from the organisation this can breed resistance from staff to adopt a change (Keep and Ash, 2001).
This essay will draw comparisons between theories of change within organisations compared to Jones Lang LaSalle Asia Pacific Integrated Facilities Management’s (JLL IFM) structure, culture, strategic and operational change approaches, change management and change agents.
The essay aims to answer whether organisational structure and culture inhibits or
…show more content…
The key factors that contribute to divisional decentralised change failure are poor executive sponsorship centrally, resistance from separate divisions to change and having adequate resources to drive change and implementation (Green, 2007). Although, implementing change across decentralised organisations can be communicated effectively as there are less layers of hierarchy to get approvals which can result in decisions being made faster, the structure can also provide a variance of constructive opinions into a change being implemented (Tripathi and Reddy,
Hughes, M 2006, 'Strategic change', in M Hughes (ed.), Change management: a critical perspective, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London, pp. 52-63.
Leading Change was named the top management book of the year by Management General. There are three major sections in this book. The first section is ¡§the change of problem and its solution¡¨ ; which discusses why firms fail. The second one is ¡§the eight-stage process¡¨ that deals with methods of performing changes. Lastly, ¡§implications for the twenty-first century¡¨ is discussed as the conclusion. The eight stages of process are as followed: (1) Establishing a sense of urgency. (2) Creating the guiding coalition. (3) Developing a vision and a strategy. (4) Communicating the change of vision. (5) Empowering employees for broad-based action. (6) Generating short-term wins. (7) Consolidating gains and producing more changes. (8) Anchoring new approaches in the culture.
In today’s ever changing world people must adapt to change. If an organization wants to be successful or remain successful they must embrace change. This book helps us identify why people succeed and or fail at large scale change. A lot of companies have a problem with integrating change, The Heart of Change, outlines ways a company can integrate change. The text book Ivanceich’s Organizational Behavior and Kotter and Cohen’s The Heart of Change outlines how change can be a good thing within an organization. The Heart of Change introduces its readers to eight steps the authors feel are important in introducing a large scale organizational change. Today’s organizations have to deal with leadership change, change in the economy,
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (June 2010). Managing organizational change: A philosophies of change approach. Journal of Change Management 10(2), 135–154.
This paper will be broken down into six sections profiling each critical part of implementing and managing change in an organization. The sections included are; outline for plan creating urgency, the approach to attracting a guiding team, a critique of the organizational profile, the components of change, and how to empower the organization.
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Everything in our world is changing, from technology to marketing to distribution to capital markets. Although it’s not always shifting in the same direction, it is changing faster than ever before. These turbulent times call for individuals with the foresight and insight to guide individuals, employees, and organizations along an often overwhelming and daunting road, while providing guidance and support along the way. Although there are many definitions of what a change agent is, generally, it is agreed that a change agent is an individual or a group who works with processes, physiological effects, and innovative decision making (Ottaway, 1983). This change can occur within an individual, organization, or society (Ottaway, 1983). Change agents can be internal, for instance, managers or employees who are selected to supervise the change process. The hierarchical nature of traditional organizations is left behind in favor of training those who have the ability to oversee change (Lunenburg, 2010). Changes are not always internal. Often employed are external consultants. External consultants are typically not bound by the organization’s culture, bureaucracy, or values, therefore, they are able to bring a unique perspective to the situation and question the status quo. Regardless of whether they are internal or external, successful change agents must have a true understanding of the nature of change and how it affects organizations. There is a deep connection between ‘leading and changing’ the organization. The role of the change agent is imperative for everyone being affected to understand in order to ensure that the change occurs comfortable and effectively. The need for individuals who can lead with this perspective, navigate th...
Change is a fundamental element of individuals, groups and all sorts of organizations. As it is the case for individuals, groups and societies, where change is a continuous process, composed of an indefinite amount of smaller sub-changes that vary in effect and length, and is affected by all sorts of aspects and events, many of which cyclic are anticipated ones. It is also the case for organizations, where change occurs repeatedly during the life cycle of organizations. Yet change in organizations is not as anticipated nor as predictable, with unexpected internal and external variables and political forces that can further complicate the management of change (Andriopoulos, C. and P. Dawson, 2009), which is by itself, the focus of many scholars in their pursuit to shed light on and facilitate the change process (Kotter 1996; Levin 1947; et al).
When organizational change proves necessary, all people at all levels of the organization should address change as a “how,” “what,” and “why” problem in order for the change to be sustained over time.
With such barriers, attempts to implement change can only be partially effective or a total failure without well-thought-out schemes. Therefore, utilization of organizational change models offers foundations for designing strategies to help facilitate the change process. Lewin’s
However, Lewin’s central model centres on unfreezing, effecting change and then refreezing, starting from the status quo, then moving things and then continuing with the new status quo (Green, 2007). Kotter’s change model focuses on establishing urgency, guiding coalition, developing strategy, communication, empowerment, short-term wins, consolidation of gains to produce and anchor new changes (Sabri et al, 2007). Kotter does not engage with the complexity of organisational systems and potential clashing, he sees change being systematic, architectural, political and doesn’t engage strongly with the less deterministic metaphors in the latter steps (Smith et al, 2015). However, Kotter does highlight the importance of communicating the vision and keeping the communication high throughout the process although this starts with a burst of energy and in later stages its followed by delegation and distance (Cameron and green, 2009). Lewin’s change model focuses on people with the collaboration, contribution creating a force field approach to change including the power holders socially, culturally and behaviourally to drive change (Smith et al, 2015). However, Lewin’s approach ignores the metaphor of groups of people only willing to change if there is a need to do so, the model is more of a planning tool rather than an organisational development process (Cameron and green,
From the definition point of view, a strategic change is defined as a persistent influence focused on the recurrent transformation of one form to another (Wiersema and Bantel, 2012). According to Goodstein (2014), a strategic change is “an inexorable part of both social and organisational life.” Various organisations find hard to implement strategic change due to resistance to change. Most prevalent resistance to change comes from middle managers as compared to the other leadership hierarchy in an organisation. Resistance to change can be better understood when taking into account behaviour change theory. This theory states that, “it can be difficult to get people to change their behaviour, even where there are good reasons
The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used
Organisations as machines, political systems, organisms, and flux and transformation are particularly common assumptions that are often used by managers, writers and consultants to make sense of how organizational change works. In reality most organizations use combinations of approaches to tackle change and not just one of the above, however these provide useful insights into the process of organizational change (Cameron and Green, 2012). This essay will try to make sense out of these assumptions to understand what organisational change is. By doing so, insights will be drawn on how organizational change can be managed and led.