Case Study: Rationale For Change

768 Words2 Pages

Rationale for change
The operational change within JLL was seen rationally from the organisations perspective as re-structuring the engineering team would result in cost saving and provide increased geographic coverage of engineering resources.
Reasons for change can be down to adopting new corporate strategies, structures, process and technology to assist organisations handle internal and external environmental conditions effectively (Goksoy, 2015). However, merely adopting change cannot drastically drive through change so organisations need to go through reconstructive change to realign the organisations objectives (Green, 2007). Although change can be introduced in these drastic fashions it can also be emergent within an organisation due …show more content…

However, Lewin’s central model centres on unfreezing, effecting change and then refreezing, starting from the status quo, then moving things and then continuing with the new status quo (Green, 2007). Kotter’s change model focuses on establishing urgency, guiding coalition, developing strategy, communication, empowerment, short-term wins, consolidation of gains to produce and anchor new changes (Sabri et al, 2007). Kotter does not engage with the complexity of organisational systems and potential clashing, he sees change being systematic, architectural, political and doesn’t engage strongly with the less deterministic metaphors in the latter steps (Smith et al, 2015). However, Kotter does highlight the importance of communicating the vision and keeping the communication high throughout the process although this starts with a burst of energy and in later stages its followed by delegation and distance (Cameron and green, 2009). Lewin’s change model focuses on people with the collaboration, contribution creating a force field approach to change including the power holders socially, culturally and behaviourally to drive change (Smith et al, 2015). However, Lewin’s approach ignores the metaphor of groups of people only willing to change if there is a need to do so, the model is more of a planning tool rather than an organisational development process (Cameron and green,

Show More
Related

  • Coping with Change; Change Management Models and Philosophies

    994 Words  | 2 Pages

    Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.

    Read More

  • Compare And Differences And Kotter's Change Management Model

    932 Words  | 2 Pages

    Change is inevitable and bound to happen in all aspects of life including business. Although change is important in an organization, it can also be seen as a strength and weakness. Effective leadership is about mastering change. One must be willing to change in order to grow and be successful. This paper will compare and contrast Kotter and Kurt Lewin step in their change management models. Furthermore, it will elaborate on the concepts and explain whether these methods can be used at the same time. In addition, this paper will include a Christian worldview of the information discussed and how it relates to the change management models.

    Read More

  • Organic Evolution Of Change Case Study

    1242 Words  | 3 Pages

    Leaders benefit from building a team to create and implement change, this is a key theme in the Kotter model of change. This teambuilding engages employees throughout the process. Allowing employees to be a part of the change process gives them the opportunity and trust to be creative moving toward the future (Cochrane, 2002). Leaders can create opportunity for employees and leaders to dialogue about the change, which can help troubleshoot the process. Leaders who engage employees throughout the organization from various levels of the organization will receive perspectives from the entire organization helping them make better-informed decisions. Employees want to be allowed the opportunity to help an organization they believe in, in a way that enhances the

    Read More

  • Change at Glenrothes Colliery: An Evaluation of John Kotter's 8-Step Model

    1692 Words  | 4 Pages

    Change is a fundamental element of individuals, groups and all sorts of organizations. As it is the case for individuals, groups and societies, where change is a continuous process, composed of an indefinite amount of smaller sub-changes that vary in effect and length, and is affected by all sorts of aspects and events, many of which cyclic are anticipated ones. It is also the case for organizations, where change occurs repeatedly during the life cycle of organizations. Yet change in organizations is not as anticipated nor as predictable, with unexpected internal and external variables and political forces that can further complicate the management of change (Andriopoulos, C. and P. Dawson, 2009), which is by itself, the focus of many scholars in their pursuit to shed light on and facilitate the change process (Kotter 1996; Levin 1947; et al).

    Read More

  • Analysis Of British Airways

    1601 Words  | 4 Pages

    The experienced change was as a reaction to the external environment and influenced organizational strategy, the company’s leadership, and culture. This large-scale change led to a new state of being (thinking and acting).

    Read More

  • “Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail”

    860 Words  | 2 Pages

    Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.

    Read More

  • Understanding the Cruciality of Corporate Change

    951 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order to improve the internal and external functionality the corporate need changes and it is the demand of time (Caetano, 1999). A business firm that does not adopt changes cannot survive long in market (Boston, 2000). Corporate change provides different significant benefits i.e., it improves competitiveness, improves financial performance, enhances employees and customer satisfaction and most important is that it leads corporate towards continuous improvement and sustainability. These are corporate benefits and not every individual in any corporate can get benefits personally from these changes but every individual working in a corporate, usually have common goals and objectives and these changes made

    Read More

  • Why do organizations change?

    1690 Words  | 4 Pages

    Why do organizations change? With time goes by, rapid development of science and technology had led us to a world full of competitions. Change and stay alert to keep up with the current trend is essential asset to survive in this aggressive global economy. As the framework indicated by Pettigrew, there are two key context factors makes a great deal of effects on the reason for companies to change. Those are outer context and Inner context. Outer context could refer to the surrounding environment around the firm and the global economics status, etc. Inner context could be downsizing, restructuring the Gestalt, or the problem with coherent design archetype. Under the stress of the outer and inner context, forces or triggers will bring out the revolution. Change can be seen in a short term way and also in a long term way. Short term change could be a sudden, discontinuous and frame-breaking rupture which has an impact on the whole organisation, or new forms of management ad structure of the firm itself, or the breakthrough created by the major innovations or even can refers to the impact of new product and new market opportunities. Normally, financial crisis will be an initiative as a trigger to revolution. At first of the revolution, there would probably already has small changes in normal management and structure. As a long term way to apply the change, change agents are needed to do an ongoing, continuous and gradual progression or give some simpler initiatives such as improvements to existing products and product range.

    Read More

  • Top Down Vs Bottom Up Change

    1050 Words  | 3 Pages

    When organizational change proves necessary, all people at all levels of the organization should address change as a “how,” “what,” and “why” problem in order for the change to be sustained over time.

    Read More

  • Culture's Critical Role in Change Management

    2535 Words  | 6 Pages

    Change in an organization occurs when an organization identifies an area of where necessary change must be undertaken, examines it thoroughly and adapts to it. This may lead to gaps where employees may not adapt to a certain change and therefore it is important that an organization takes into considerati...

    Read More

  • Change Management Case Study

    1745 Words  | 4 Pages

    The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used

    Read More

  • Organizational Change In Castle Home Ltd

    1589 Words  | 4 Pages

    Organisation change is very important and every company should have resistance to change by time to time to get a better performance and motivation. According to the (Burnes, 2004) Change is becoming a present character of organisational life and it is an incremental change. In this case study of Castle home ltd we can see that it was based on emergent planned, Foremen had the knowledge of understanding of the organisation structures, strategies and its culture which will allow managers to choose the most specific approach of resistance to change (Burnes, 1996) but now it is a planned changed which describes a situation where a change agent takes purposeful actions for the change of the organisation from one state to another (Ulster Business School, 2014, p. 24). Wagner, E. (2006) Communication plays a very significant role in term of organisational change strategy which is necessary from time to time in order to having a strong desire to be more successful than competitors and it becomes more efficient so that everyone in the organisation can easily understand it. The main reason of planned change for the organisation is to maximise their effectiveness and to achieve their goals and aim for the higher performance.

    Read More

  • Organizational Change Essay

    1343 Words  | 3 Pages

    The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.

    Read More

  • Contemporary Issues in Management

    1159 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is apparent that the only thing constant in business is change. Organizational change is often an overwhelming challenge for business leaders, managers and employees alike. The need for change may be the result of market shifts, economic environment, technology advancements or changing work force skill-set demands. Today Organizational change occurs for reasons that originate external to the organization (Chandler, 1996: Hannan & Freeman, 1984), as well as internal to the organization (Baker 1990: Prechel 1994). Thus, External constraints, internal constraints, resource dependency and increasingly growing competitive markets force organizations to change in order to maximize economic potential. Although organizational changes are usually a response in reaction to an event, companies and leaders should still expect to encounter issues. Organizations need to be more proactive and contingent on how to handle the problems that will inevitably come about. This will make the process of organizational change go smoothly as well as reduce resistance through proper management techniques. Resource dependency argues that both environmental and organizational constraints impact organizational change (Pfeffer & Salancik, 2003).

    Read More

  • Essay On Organizational Change

    2838 Words  | 6 Pages

    Organisations as machines, political systems, organisms, and flux and transformation are particularly common assumptions that are often used by managers, writers and consultants to make sense of how organizational change works. In reality most organizations use combinations of approaches to tackle change and not just one of the above, however these provide useful insights into the process of organizational change (Cameron and Green, 2012). This essay will try to make sense out of these assumptions to understand what organisational change is. By doing so, insights will be drawn on how organizational change can be managed and led.

    Read More

More about Case Study: Rationale For Change

Open Document