Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Managing change in the workplace
Effects of change in an organization
Effects of change in an organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Managing change in the workplace
Understanding and Coping with Change The main consistent in today’s work environment is change, and frequently it happens rapidly, before representations and administration can rationally plan. Keeping your work environment running viably means assisting representatives with adapting to those changes. Change can be a struggle for some people and it can be a challenge for others. “Change is and always has been an inevitable part of life” (Covi, n.d.). In this paper, it will discuss the internal and external factors that contributes to resisting changes in the workplace as well as understanding and dealing with changes. Internal and external factors contributing to someone’s resistance to change. According to Baack (2012), employees resist change for reasons of self-premium when they understand that levels of influence, cash, esteem, employer stability and individual accommodation are in question (10.4, par 2). Resistance can likewise be founded on just not understanding why a change has gotten to be vital (Covi, n.d.). Whatever the reasons and types of individual resistance to change are, they have negative ramifications to the change’s accomplishment arrangement and in this manner they should be managed productively and with viable system. Also, from the internal of the organization, There was this one situation that occurred several years ago with Department of Labor which affected the contract company that I currently work for. The situation was that Department of Labor had decided to make a change within the Job Corps system where it was broken down into five (5) phases and we had to reconstruct the entire staff. I was very resistant to this change because I enjoyed where I was currently working and had a great supervisor who was always willing to help, very considerate of others and
Change affects more than just a program or a process within an organization, change affects employees, collecting data on employee’s readiness and willingness to accept a change will help leaders know if the organization is socially ready for change (Cole, Harris, and Bernerth, 2006). A change might be positive for an organization but if the employees who will be affect by the change are lost in the process then it could create a greater issue than not making the change. Leadership needs to communicate and inspire the employees to be positive toward the change, seeking to enhance their job satisfaction not make changes that will increase their desire to leave. This data is best collected early in the change initiative allowing leadership to properly cast the vision while addressing concerns. This requires leadership to create platforms for employees to engage in the change initiative freely (Ford, 2006). Employee attitudes can be measured through these dialogues providing leadership with necessary measureable data (Hughes, 2007).
For many, change is a cause for ignorance. Most of us fear the idea of change. When one is faced to deal with c...
Kegan, R. & L. Laskow Lahey. (2009). Immunity to Change: How to overcome it and unlock potential in yourself and your organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Prevention of resistance is most effective when implementing change. Preventing the weight of inertia in a workplace allows the change to happen in a timely manner with minimal problems. As Lee (2004) emphasizes, leaders have the ability to effect change and performance. If someone is accountable for outcomes and poor habits, outcomes will improve. The manager must show a caring attitude over the process of change and welcome any positive innovation. This caring attitude will become contagious to the employees working under him and become a priority to them as well. Approaching the change in an accepting, open-minded manner can decrease the vulnerability and frustration associated with change. How the change is presented can make the biggest difference in the outcome of the change. The manager must show that blaming will be avoided at all costs. One will only ask why, not who, to avoid the feeling of belittlement. This can allow employees to become comfortable with voicing their opinions and mistakes, which can allow an even greater range of improvement. The manager must also encourage...
Change is a fundamental element of individuals, groups and all sorts of organizations. As it is the case for individuals, groups and societies, where change is a continuous process, composed of an indefinite amount of smaller sub-changes that vary in effect and length, and is affected by all sorts of aspects and events, many of which cyclic are anticipated ones. It is also the case for organizations, where change occurs repeatedly during the life cycle of organizations. Yet change in organizations is not as anticipated nor as predictable, with unexpected internal and external variables and political forces that can further complicate the management of change (Andriopoulos, C. and P. Dawson, 2009), which is by itself, the focus of many scholars in their pursuit to shed light on and facilitate the change process (Kotter 1996; Levin 1947; et al).
Strategic management is dissimilar to change management because it has a poor or maybe strategic management may not have a plan that does not existent. Through change management perspective, they examine other drivers that influence the employee’s resistance to change. They support their employees though the process of change. Strategic management does things quite different from change management, strategic management is, and “the result is a deficient process that invariably fails to yield the expected results from effort”.( Menkhoff, & Wah, 2008) What change management could do is stop treating the resistance as a problem employee, and understand the many factor that that drive resistance and manage it and this will help the employee to change in management. Strategic management does not require evaluation or feedback mechanism and it also has limited the linkage between plans and the actions that will
Change usually comes with resistance in any workplace because change disrupts the employees’ sense of safety and control (Lewis, 2012). Kurt Lewin (1951) created a three step process for assisting employees with organizational Change (Lewis, 2012). The three stages are Unfreeze, Change and Refreeze. These are the steps to a smooth transition for change within organizations. Further, these steps are not possible without good communication from upper Management through line staff. Communication was consistently listed as an issue in surveys conducted by the department.
Middlebrook, B., Caruth, D., & Frank, R. (1984, Summer 85). Overcoming Resistance to Change. Management Journal, 50(3), pp. 23.
If I am unable to create a felt need for change, or deal with resistance to change, then my subordinates will not acknowledge that there is a better way to operate. Alternatively, if either of these segments are not fully developed I will face extended deadlines, lost purpose,
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used
McNay I (2006) Beyond Mass Higher Education: Building on Experience. The society for research into higher education and Open University Press.
Organisational change can cause stress for employees at all levels of an organisation, one of the main causes of increased employee stress during organisational change is employees’ perception of organisational change as a threat; many employees feel that there may be a threat to their job security, their status, or their ability to achieve if the conditions of their work are altered (Dahl, 2011). Employees may face changes in their written contracts and also in their implicit psychological contracts during organisational change, the change to these unwritten contracts can result in increased stress due to feelings of anger or betrayal by employees as they feel that they no longer know what to expect from their employer (Robinson & Rousseau, 1994). In addition, if employees do not feel that the organisation acts in a fair and just way they are more likely to
There are many aspects in change leadership and people’s fear is one of them. Working as team member in a company takes a long time to adapt to other team members and work productively. Those employees who cannot accept changes fast and adapt to new team members may have troubles to work effectively and may be causing stagnation of other workers and a...