Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Predator and prey relationship report
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Predator and prey relationship report
Living things are categorized by being either a prey animal or a predator animal. A prey animal is what a predator eats and the predator animal is what eats the prey. A stable predator-prey relationship would be when there are more sheep than wolves. This is stable because the predators, which are the wolves, will have enough prey animals to eat. An unstable predator-prey relationship would be if there were more wolves than sheep. This relationship is unstable because the predators will not have enough food to eat. The goal of this investigation was to test stable environments and see when they would go unstable. The guided question was “which factors affect the stability of a predator-prey population size relationships?” This supports the background information because it brings up the question of what will disrupt the stability of an environment. …show more content…
The purpose of this simulation is to test the stability between grass, sheep, and wolves. The procedure used in this trial was to first check the grass to where the grass would not be unlimited. Second, set the grass regrowth time to thirty percent. Third, set the number of sheep to four and keep the wolves the same number as the default settings. The simulation ran for one hundred ticks. We used this procedure because we know that if the prey is less than the number of predators the relationship will be unstable. The data that was collected was the number of sheep, the number of wolves, and if the variables went extinct or not. The data was collected because they are the variables in the simulation. The data was analyzed by putting all of our observations into a graph. The data was analyzed this way because it is the most efficient
Purpose: The purpose of this lab is to investigate the various components of different ecosystems in a smaller representation and study the conditions required for the ecosystem’s sustainability as well as the connections between
The aim of this paper is to cover how each area of the simulation relates to what we have discussed in the class. We are going to discuss target market, 4p’s of marketing, performance metrics and research data.
If a prey species decreases in abundance, this leads to increased intraspecific and interspecific competition, which could have negative impacts on the species. One area of concern is the effects of climate change on the abundance and behaviour of krill, one of the leopard seal’s source of food during the winter (Siniff, et al., 2008).
a.) Choosing organisms from four different trophic levels of this four web as examples, explain how energy is obtained at each trophic level.
The processes of predation affect virtually every species to some degree or another. Predation can be defined as when members of one species eat (and/or kill) those of another species. The specific type of predation between wolves and large ungulates involves carnivores preying on herbivores. Predation can have many possible effects on the interrelations of populations. To draw any correlations between the effects of these predator-prey interactions requires studies of a long duration, and statistical analysis of large data sets representative of the populations as a whole.
Thousands of animals are put to sleep each year due to not having any available homes for them to be adopted. According to Jennifer Sexton and Tom Warhol in Domestic Animal Overpopulation, “The average female cat can produce two litters of six kittens per year, a female dog can produce one litter of six or more puppies per year, making pet overpopulation a significant problem.” Animal overpopulation is costing money and you can help the pets with spay and neutering programs. A new solution is mandatory contracts for breeders and spay and neuter programs. This paper will talk about spay and neuter programs, contracts for breeders, and why some people don’t think animal overpopulation is a problem. Thankfully there are solutions to this issue of animal overpopulation.
...rganisms’ populations to decrease as well. On the other hand, if the predator’s population was to decrease drastically, then the prey’s population would come to a rise. There may then not be enough food available for the prey. This could also cause populations to decrease.
Organization-environment relations depict certain areas of UCSB in their entirety in which two of those theories include population ecology and neoinstitutional theory. Population ecology and neoinstitutional theory looks at UCSB in divergent perspectives: population ecology looks at UCSB as a living or dying species whereas neoinstitutional theory highlights UCSB’s importance as an establishment to its field of education. With this, I am going to compare both, population ecology and neoinstitutional theory, in relation to the University of California – Santa Barbara. I will further discuss each of their strengths and weaknesses in accordance to the behavior and environment of institution, faculty, staff, and its students.
This type of writing is not meant for leisurely reading; it is meant to translate and share scientific findings amongst agriculturalists. Therefore, scientific writing is not always entertaining to read, sometimes, it can be difficult to understand and challenging to digest the material in its entirety. Even more so, articles, written academically, will possess visual literacy, mathematical literacy, data, and technical vocabulary; these variables will display the information in a different presentational form. In the article, Seasonal comparison of daily activity budgets of gray squirrels in an urban area, the authors choose to present the reader with tables, mathematical literacy, and charts representing the given data of the daily activity budgets of squirrels. Gonzales, Nilon, and Parker decided to use tables and graphs to help the reader better understand the written information with a visual representation of the data; sometimes it is easier to visually see data than to read
Is it right to think that population is a threat to the global environment? Is there indeed a direct correlation between population and environment? Is there such thing as overpopulation and who has the power to say that there is what they called overpopulation? These are some of the questions that are running through my mind. Now, in response to the question “Is limiting the population growth a key factor in protecting the global environment?” I with all conviction say no to that. I believe that it is the behavior of the people and not the population growth itself that affects the environment.
off of just one host but very few predators can feed on the same prey(1973). In
If the number of animals recaptured in the second sample (n2) is less than 8, the estimation of the population is likely to be biased. If there are losses from the population during the remixing period, then the estimation would be for the size of the population at the time of the first sampling session. If there are gains in the population, the estimation would correspond to population size during the second sampling session.... ... middle of paper ...
Each bench mate had one responsibility, both having the responsibility of being the predator, however one of the bench mate assumed responsibility of whom acted as the beak that could had been a fork, a spoon or a knife, while the other bench mate was given the cup that served as the predator’s stomach. The carpet was the environment, and the environment consisted of a population that was home to 300 organisms. The simulation played that harsh realities of life and everyone had to eat as much as they could in the thirty-seconds that was given. Then the number of prey items were eaten were counted and the allele frequency was counted in the survived population. Each item that was consumed was counted and entered into the data, to see how much was eaten by the predators. The process was repeated until the end of the
Around the 1950’s, C.S. Holling decided to look into the reasoning of why predators can control their numbers of their prey. For example, when prey densities tend to increase, the predators respond by changing their rate of consumption for them to satisfy their hunger. This concept is also known as a functional response, and Holling created a method to reflect this model. His model consisted of blind folding human participants (considered as predators) and having them search for sand paper disks (prey) scattered throughout a board, to observe the responses of the participants to the disks. The participants’ reactions reflected a predator’s rate of discovery and handling time (reactions) to the amount of prey in a certain area. The predator’s responses usually reflect a Type II functional response, yet there are about three functional responses a predator may portray: Type I, Type II, and Type III.
Populations contain very delicate and reactive relationships between species. These populations can be largely impacted by small changes such as weather or climate. Most populations stay relatively balanced by predators or limited food sources. Populations are sometimes directly correlated to each other and when one gets too large they either get killed by the other or starve from competition over food. Our experiment was designed to answer the question, which factors affect the stability of a predator-prey population size relationship? This shows how populations balance each other out. Our claim was that if there is a higher amount of time needed for the re-growth of the grass, the amount of sheep, and therefore wolves, will go down.