Analyzing The Predator's Functional Response

1128 Words3 Pages

Around the 1950’s, C.S. Holling decided to look into the reasoning of why predators can control their numbers of their prey. For example, when prey densities tend to increase, the predators respond by changing their rate of consumption for them to satisfy their hunger. This concept is also known as a functional response, and Holling created a method to reflect this model. His model consisted of blind folding human participants (considered as predators) and having them search for sand paper disks (prey) scattered throughout a board, to observe the responses of the participants to the disks. The participants’ reactions reflected a predator’s rate of discovery and handling time (reactions) to the amount of prey in a certain area. The predator’s responses usually reflect a Type II functional response, yet there are about three functional responses a predator may portray: Type I, Type II, and Type III. …show more content…

Such as if the predator eats a certain proportion when the densities are low, it will continue eating the same proportion of prey when the densities increase. Furthermore, a Type II functional reponse is when the amount of prey consumed by predators increases quickly, but begins to level off when the predator has had enough food, even though the prey density continues to rise. Finally, like a Type II response, a type III response also has an upper limit to prey consumption but differs as the predator learns timing, and/or prey switching, at low prey density levels. Moreover on the social side of Holling’s disk equation, one can look into the process of an individual seeking help from living with Anorexia Nervosa

Open Document