Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theory of psychological egoism in altruism
Does true altruism exist in social psychology
Altruism and prosocial behaviour in real life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theory of psychological egoism in altruism
Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people.” We are All Bystanders by Jason Marsh and Dacher Keltner is an article that reflects on the psychological and social phenomenon that refers to cases in which people do not offer any assistance or help to a victim. Studies say that a person's personality can determine how they react to a bystander situation. In a book called, The Heart of Altruism, author Kristen Monroe writes the altruistic perspective. Altruistic people are strongly connected to other humans and have a concern for the well-being of others. Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief exemplifies the bystander theory through Liesel and …show more content…
Hans’ altruistic personalities. Depending on some factors, a person’s personality and skill, the factors might change how a person will respond to a situation. During the Jew’s first walk to Dachau through Himmel Street, Papa feeds bread to an old Jewish man while everyone else just stands and gapes. Later, Liesel does the same, but with Max. A person’s altruism, or their practice of selfless concern for the well-being of others, can determine how they will react in a bystander situation.
In the Book Thief, both Liesel and Hans have very altruistic personalities. When the Jew’s march through Himmel Street to get to Dachau, everyone knows where they are going. They watch them march by, walking around them and staring. 75 percent of Hungary’s 600,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, and only a few brave people tried to save just one Jew. (We Are All Bystanders page 4) These people risked their lives to shelter Jews, much like Rosa and Hans Hubermann. As the Jews march to Dachau, and the residents of Himmel Street stand and watch the Jews marching towards their death at the concentration camps, Death writes, “The book thief could do nothing but watch them back in a long, incurable moment before they were gone again. She could only hope they could read the depth of sorrow in her face, to recognize that it was true, and not fleeting.” ( ) Liesel feels helpless, like she can’t do anything. She longs to call out to them and help but knows that it would be worthless. A few minutes later, however, Papa takes action. Papa quickly grabs something from his paint cart and helps an old man who was struggling to walk and gives him some bread. Papa took action when no one else would. Papa pays the consequence, but in that moment, Papa displayed moral courage. Papa’s selfless personality let him reach out to help the man, even
if it meant that he would get whipped, and sent away for work. Liesel follows in his footsteps, and while she only gets a boot in the ass, Liesel acts out against all the other bystanders by speaking to Max. Both Papa and Liesel show moral courage to intercede rather than stand among the passive bystanders, only wishing they could do something.
Strong feelings towards another can lead to imprudent actions. Throughout The Book Thief Liesel, Rudy, and Hans make impetuous decisions due to their strong emotions towards another. From reading this novel one can conclude that there is a very fine line between irrationality and bravery. Most of the decisions and subsequent actions made in the story could be regarded as brave but in truth many of these decisions were impetuous and ill thought out. In fact many of the characters subsequently came to this conclusion as well. The characters could have achieved more by executing logically planed actions instead of acting on the spur of the moment and jeopardizing their lives or the lives of others. It is amazing that even polar opposites emotions like love and hate result in the same irrational consequences as exemplified by Rudy, Hans and Liesel.
Adam Smith’s moral theory explains that there is an “impartial spectator” inside each of us that aids in determining what is morally and universally good, using our personal experiences and human commonalities. In order to judge our own actions, we judge and observe the actions of others, at the same time observing their judgments of us. Our impartial spectator efficiently allows us to take on two perceptions at once: one is our own, determined by self-interest, and the other is an imaginary observer. This paper will analyze the impartiality of the impartial spectator, by analyzing how humans are motivated by self-interest.
Human nature has many elements that reveal the growth and personality of a person. In Markus Zusak’s “The Book Thief”, the author successfully portrays various aspects of human nature through Hans’ conflicts that originate from the tough reality that he lives in. Elements of human nature can be seen as a result of Hans’ constant struggles with guilt, kindness, and love.
Throughout the book, Hans uses situations and ideas to teach Liesel what is right and wrong, and shows her how she has the ability to give hope and life to those around her. “He came in every night and sat with her. The first couple of times, he simply stayed-a stranger to kill the aloneness. A few nights after that, he whispered, “Shhh I’m here, it’s all right.” After three weeks, he held her. Trust was accumulated quickly, due primarily to the brute strength of the man’s gentleness, his thereness. “ (Zusak 36) When Hans appears every night to comfort Liesel, he is demonstrating how love and care for someone can change their view on a situation, and even influence the people around them. Hans and his “thereness” relieved the terror and pain Liesel felt every night while having nightmares about her brother. After her brother’s death, Liesel feels that she has no purpose with this new family, and feels like her life will be miserable without her mother and brother. However, Hans is willing to step in and provide an honest and truthful man for Liesel to confide in and love. By giving Liesel this backbone to lean on after such a loss, he is also showing her what it means to give others hope, and how she can make a difference in the world even as a small poor girl. “They read through the early hours of the morning, circling and writing the words she did not comprehend, and turning the pages toward daylight. A few times, Papa nearly slept, succumbing to the itchy fatigue in his eyes and the wilting of his head. Liesel caught him out on each occasion, but she had neither the selflessness to allow him to sleep nor the hide to be offended.” (Zusak 86) Reading is an act of love between Hans Hubermann and Liesel Meminger. By reading to Liesel every night, Hans is creating a real father-daughter relationship with Liesel. Hans wants the
Although people can fear an outcome of telling the truth or standing up for what they believe is right, being a bystander in a poor situation doesn’t exempt someone from innocence. Whether it involves a murder or telling the truth, if someone knows it is wrong and does nothing to take part in what’s going on they are no better than the ones involved in the conflict. In To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee and The Lottery by Shirley Jackson, both stories involve bystanders. A bystander is not innocent when they do nothing about the problem going on around them.
It was on a train with Liesel’s mother and brother where they were travelling when death made his first appearance in the book thief’s life. He took the soul of her brother and only glanced at the girl truly, not taking real note of her as he did his job. She knew that her brother was dead at that point, but the shock wouldn’t truly take her until she snatched a book from where it had fallen near her brother’s hastily made grave. After he was buried, Liesel and her mother continued on their way, arriving at the town of Molching, where she met Hans and Rosa Hubermann. In the first few months that she had arrived, nightmares plagued her mind, haunting her with images of Werner, her brother, and his cold dead eyes. Hans is the one to comfort her, and because of this she grows to trust in him and truly view him as her father. She enjoys his company as well, for he can play the accordion and is always smiling and winking at her in a joyous way. He also begins to teach her how to read the book that she picked up on the day d...
People perpetrate seemingly selfless acts almost daily. You see it all over the news; the man who saved that woman from a burning building, the mother who sacrificed herself to protect her children from the bomb blast. But how benevolent are these actions? Are these so-called “heroes” really sacrificing themselves to help others? Until recently, it was the common belief that altruism, or selfless and unconditional kindness, was limited primarily to the human race. However, within the last century, the works of several scientists, most prominently George Price, have provided substantial evidence concluding that altruism is nothing more than a survival technique, one that can be calculated with a simple equation.
The bystander effect plays a key role in society today. More and more people ignore a person in distress.
Most people just complain about the wickedness and the corruption of society, and they do not realize that they are contributing to the problem by doing nothing to stop it and just being mere bystanders. Bystanders are those individuals that do not take part in events despite being present during those times. In spite of the consequences that it entails being a bystander, this kind of behavior is usually driven by the desire to avoid problems. In order to avoid this misleading mentality, many philosophers and social activists have advocated against people being bystanders. An individual should not be a bystander because being a bystander is morally incorrect, inhuman, and harmful.
I was 16 years old when this event occurred in my life. “During this period the identity concern reaches climax” (Miller, 1983). Reality struck me in a matter of minutes. Following quite a traumatizing yet memorable incident, I think it is safe to say that was and still is the most amazing thing that has ever happened to me. Two years ago, I witnessed a brutal car crash that will ceaselessly remain imprinted in my memory. My friends and I were in my car, parked on the street parallel to the one where the accident occurred. All we could see were a bunch of ‘Bedouins’, who seemed rather oblivious of the present situation, gathered up, surrounding the man that had crashed. This is where John Darley’s bystander effect theory comes into action- were we to just assume ignorance like all the other bystanders or were we to respond to the situation and ultimately be part of a possible investigation? By this moment in time I was able to gain “self c...
One of the strengths is providing a new insight into bystander effect. The study argued that researchers have previously neglected the potential benefit of bystanders and thus, the study provided a new horizon by proving reversed bystander effect through experiment. This allows us to be aware of the fact that someone may be providing help merely due to impression management. This arouses a doubt on whether the one who provides help is genuinely concerned about the needs of the victims, or one is just motivated by upholding his/her reputation when surrounded by a crowd. Besides, carrying out a manipulation check right after this experiment is beneficial to this study as well....
She thought of her mother an repeated Rosa Hubermanns questions. Where was she? What had they done to her? And once and for all, who, in the actual fact, were they?” (qtd. Zuzak pg.96 ). In this quote, it shows how Liesel is being left in the dark about the events happening in Nazi Germany and the activities their government is doing without the public’s knowledge such as mass murders and imprisonment of specific cultural groups and the possible effects these events could have on Liesel’s biological mother. It has been proven that children that are acknowledged as risk-takers and know more about the world around them are more likely to be stronger as well as more competent, therefore they can be a better contributor to society as an individual. If Liesel was more aware of the situation of the war happening around her, and of the consequences it could have on her mother (such as poverty or the lack of food), she would most likely be less curious about her biological mother’s situation and would be able to focus on more important and current situations such as her amelioration in reading and writing in school which would help her not only in school but in her everyday life as
As Liesel struggles with her friend Rudy Steiner whose dad has been coerced to join the military, she sees a site that befuddles her. Max, the Jewish man that Liesel’s family sheltered in their basement was marching to his death: a concentration camp. Despair fills her like a bucket in a stormy day, and suddenly she doesn’t “want to hope for anything anymore… [not] that Max is alive and safe… Or Alex Steiner. Because the world does not deserve them” (Zusak 521). She ends up ripping her only savior, books. In this excerpt, it is obviously shown that life can be a despicable thing. So many people have been torn away from Liesel and in brings Liesel great burdens. She is helpless and hopeless, cast aside to forever watch, but never be able to fix anything. Thus, the lack of power people have in their lives is shown, life seemingly merciless as he continuously chucks struggles at those who are powerless to begin with. Life seems to be an all encompassing darkness while Death sees both the burdens of the soul, and the narrow glimpse of light. Death sees the “best and worst… [the] ugly and their [the] beauty…” and he honestly believes that “humans, if nothing else, have the good sense to die” (Zusak 491). This acknowledges that he not only is burdened by the bad, but Death also sees the light and the beauty. The life Liesel is
Altruism and empathy are words heard often, but very few know the true meaning of these words or how to display such qualities. It has been argued by philosophers, psychologist, sociologist and many others since seemingly the dawn of time what humankinds true nature is. Are we born with the innate inclination for good, for bad or somewhere in between? In On Kindness by Adam Phillips and Barbara Taylor they discuss the human capability for kindness and the different ways in which kindness has been displayed and interpreted over the years. Much of what their book discusses can be related to the stories shared by Rebecca Solnit in, A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster. Though after reading these
Today individuals tend to overlook to those that need help when something goes wrong in their lives. Even at the toughest moments, we seem passive not in such circumstances in each day action in our lives, including showing no sympathy for people that can be helpless in bad settings. The main reason is how people can be joyful for mistakes in the way their perspective of being safe in their own comfort zone not giving assistance at times. One instance that I am part of such situation was the time in our state of Florida a hurricane name Matthew approach our state. It was quite a complicated matter because many seem glad for such event to occur most were students, although in the first place, this lead