Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories of learning and teaching
Inclusive education theory
Concept of inclusive education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories of learning and teaching
Throughout the century, voluminous amounts of philosophers have developed theories that have analysed and elucidated how children learn during the course of their schooling years. There are copious amounts researchers that not only have influenced the lives children and their development but also the teaching dynamics of today’s education. Lev Vygotsky left a prime impression within society as his notions about learning swiftly became prevalent and were used to contribute to “Constructivism” as a manner of teaching to support the diversity of students within the classroom. Vygotsky believed that accurate education is not the mere learning of specific knowledge, but it is the gradual development of children’s learning aptitudes (Dolya 2009). With Vygotsky’s notion of the ‘Zone of Proximal Development, and the related concept of ‘scaffolding’, it will support today’s full range of children within the education system whether it be individual or group differences. Educational researchers have found the theory of Vygotsky to be surprisingly valuable in their understanding of the teaching and learning conception as the complex process impacts both social and cultural contexts within today’s society.
Vygotsky’s believed that the purpose of education is to introduce children to the various range of cultural tools and demonstrate how to use them to analyse reality quickly and successfully (Dolya 2009). Within past years, it is undoubted that teachers have been challenged with numerous alterations contained by educational policies, one being the inclusion of multiple diverse cultures within one classroom. While there is currently much emphasis on differentiation in schools, there is no clear consensus about what the term implies. It is li...
... middle of paper ...
...ns of socio-historical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3-39.
Ormrod, J. 2008. Human learning (5th ed.). Pennsylvania State University, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall. 39.
Puntambekar, S. 2009. Scaffolding. Accessed 18th May 2014, http://www.education.com/reference/article/scaffolding/.
Smelser, N. J. & Baltes P. B. 2001. International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences. Florida, USA: Elsevier Ltd. P2094-2098.
Verenikina, I & Vialle, W 2013. Cultural-historical view of learning and development: Lev Vygotsky. In: Dawson, Annabel Educational Foundations. 2nd ed. Australia: Cengage Learning. 37-48.
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes . London: Harvard University Press. 57.
Warford, Mark. 2011. The zone of proximal teacher development. Teaching and teacher education. 27 (2), 252-258.
This reading reminded me about how Vygotsky’s theory is mostly based on the interactions and influences help children to learn. I really do believe this theory is very accurate, because students can learn from each other. If a teacher is having trouble explaining a complex topic to a student, another student can explain it in more relatable way. Also, I was fascinated when I read about what cultural tools, were and how they related to Vygotsky’s beliefs. Learning about what cultural tools were, helped me to broaden my understanding of how crucial cultural tools are to student’s learning process. Also, the chapter did a great job of elaborating on how these tools can help to advance and grow in the understanding of student’s thinking process. Another aspect of this reading that interested me was the elaboration on private speech and the Zone of Proximal Development. Each of the definitions displayed help me to advance my own thinking on what it was and how it is used in regards to the education of students. The description of what private speech and how it is basically the inner narration of their thinking process helped me to understand how this aspect can help with students learning. Also, the Zone of Proximal Development helped me to make a connection to both what is and how it relates to private speech as well. The Zone of proximal development plays a crucial role in the
Gross, R (2010). Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour. 6th ed. London: Hodder Education. p188.
Bibliography 3rd edition Psychology (Bernstein-Stewart, Roy, Srull, & Wickens) Houghton Mifflin Company Boston, Massachusetts 1994
...onson, E., Wilson, T.D., & Akert, R.M. (2013). Social Psychology (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
"Recent findings from L.J. Stricker and co-authors highlight research in applied social psychology.." Psychology & Psychiatry Journal 4 Aug. 2008: 1-18. Print.
Waiten,W., (2007) Seventh Edition Psychology Themes and Variations. University of Nevada, Las Vegas: Thomson Wadsworth.
Shabani, K. Khatib, M. Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional Implications and Teacher’s Professional Development. 3(4), December, 2010. English Language Teaching: Tehran, Iran. Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/8396
There are five ways in which Piaget’s theory of cognitive development and Vygotsky’s theory of the Zone of Proximal Development. The very first way that teachers can use these theories to teach constructively is by providing scaffolded instruction within the ZPD for their students (292). In other words, a teacher must be able to assist children in achieving a goal that may be slightly too difficult for them to reach alone. An example of this would be if a teacher had decided that her class should do an experiment on how well plants grow based on the amount of water they receive, she could challenge her students to make a hypothesis about what they think will happen. This teacher could allow her students to individually plant their seeds and then guiding her students to predict or hypothesize what they believe will happen if one plant gets more water than another. This example directly correlates with Vygotsky’s idea of ZPD because
Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky are two very well-known theorists who emphasized the development of cognition in their theories. In Piaget’s Cognitive Developmental theory, he claimed that children go through a series of stages, which he used to describe human development. In Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory of Learning, he believed culture and social interaction played a role in cognitive development. Although Piaget and Vygotsky both focused their theories on cognitive development they take different stances a series of developmental issues. This paper will look at the similarities and differences between these theorist’s views on critical developmental issues, such as view of human nature, mechanisms of development, and their
Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, self and society and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vygotsky believes that social interaction will help with children to be more knowledgeable in society. He felt that culture teaches people how to think and ways to learn and memorize. He used zone of proximal development to engage with the level of performance a child can co-exist and achieve with someone with more knowledge. The Zone of Proximal Development provides that a child can independently accomplish specific tasks with guidance and encouragement from a knowledgeable adult. It is known that no child can exceed the zone of proximal. Vygotsky suggests a child’s environment is a vital contributor to development and learning. Children learn when they are left alone. In Vygotsky theory language is very important; the use of word helps enhance their cognitive
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind In Society:the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.
This theory is concerned with how individuals learn large amounts of meaningful material from verbal/textual presentations in a school setting in contrast to theories developed in the context of laboratory experiments. According to Ausubel, learning is based upon the kinds of super ordinate, representational, and combinatorial processes that occur during the reception of information. He also explains that new learning or acquisition of knowledge is related to relevant ideas in the existing cognitive structure. Cognitive structures represent the residue of all learning experiences; forgetting occurs because certain details get integrated and lose their individual identity.
... middle of paper ... ... Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (2007): 1332–356. Print. The.
Dr Dennis Francis Commonwealth Education Trust Week 1 and 2 “Teacher training or education is something that can be managed by others; Teacher development is something that can be done only by and for oneself” Wallace, 1991.