Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reguirements of inclusive education
Reguirements of inclusive education
Essays on inclusive education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For over 25 years society’s attitudes towards people with disabilities have changed significantly. As a result, education for students with disabilities has made a prominent transformation. Particular social and historical events, both international and national, have played an integral part in influencing the development of inclusive education in Australia (Thomas and Loxley, 2007). Furthermore the history of society’s attitudes towards difference has had a major influence towards the formation of policies and legislation related to inclusivity, as well as impacted the way society accepts difference today. This critical reflection aims to identify the underlying values of inclusive education policies and legislation, and the influence they may have on society’s attitudes towards accepting difference. I will also reflect on my broadened understanding of what it means to be inclusive and how this has impacted my future implications for teaching.
Dating back to the 1800s and earlier, society’s perspectives of people with disabilities were misunderstood. This “lack of understanding” consequently led to ridicule, rejection, labelling and stigmatisation of not only people with disabilities but people who were different to the ‘norm’ of society (Duke, 2009, p. 3). Over the years there has been a significant shift in social attitude, particularly in how students with disabilities should be educated. These social attitudes of the past and the contemporary attitudes of society today have ultimately steered the development of a more inclusive society. According to Konza (2008) ‘nominalisation’ is a significant factor to the changing attitudes of society. Nominalisation encompasses the notion that people with disabilities are entitled to “...
... middle of paper ...
...
Australian Human Rights Commission. (2009). Disability Discrimination Act 2005. Retrieved March
8, 2010, from http://www.hreoc.gov.au/disability_rights/standards/standards.html
Duke, J. (2009). Inclusive Education Discussion Paper. Retrieved March 8, 2010, from
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/26314/1/c26314.pdf
Foreman, P. (2008). Inclusion in Action. Victoria: Cengage Learning Australia
Konza, D. (2008). Inclusion of students with disabilities in new times: responding to the challenge.
Retrieved March 8, 2010, from http://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/36
Thomas, G. & Loxley, A. (2001). Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion.
Buckingham: Open University Press.
Queensland Education (2005). Inclusive Education Statement. Retrieved 11 March 2010, from
http://education.qld.gov.au/studentservices/learning/docs/inclusedstatement2005
The movement for inclusion in education has advanced since the years of special schools for children with disabilities. Although there have been significant changes to the laws protecting the rights of children with disabilities there remains an underlying debate as to whether these children should be in main stream classes. Most states and territories in Australia practice inclusive education, however this remains a contentious topic with differing attitudes. It is evident whilst many challenges remain, schools should implement and deliver quality programs that reflect best practice policies. Positive teacher attitudes, promoting diversity, modelling inclusion in the classroom and developing a sense of community by working in partnerships
What do we do with children with disabilities in the public school? Do we include them in the general education class with the “regular” learning population or do we separate them to learn in a special environment more suited to their needs? The problem is many people have argued what is most effective, full inclusion where students with all ranges of disabilities are included in regular education classes for the entire day, or partial inclusion where children spend part of their day in a regular education setting and the rest of the day in a special education or resource class for the opportunity to work in a smaller group setting on specific needs. The need for care for children with identified disabilities both physical and learning continues to grow and the controversy continues.
Through the development of Inclusive Education it is possible that children grow up to be more accepting of differences, where once the notion of something “different” and “separate” could cause caution, fear and ridicule. There are multiple policies and processes present within our society supporting inclusivity and the right every child regardless of their special needs or difficult circumstances has to an education. The Salamanca Statement developed world wide in 1994 states every child’s right to an education. In support of this policy the Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act (1992) sets disability standards in our education system and the Melbourne Declaration (2008) further attempts to promote equity and excellence within our schools.
Jorgensen, C. M. (1997 July). Curriculum and Its Impact on Inclusion and the Achievement of Students with Disabilities. Retrieved October 8, 2002 from http://www.asri.edu/CFSP/brochure/curricib.htm
Inclusion is not a new idea, but has been rapidly gaining momentum within many disciplines internationally. Inclusive education is a term often associated with special education, and children with additional needs. However, inclusive education is about ensuring that educational settings allow for meaningful participation by all learners. Each child has their own unique identity, ways of doing things, strengths and weaknesses. Ministry of Education [MoE] (1998) states that teachers “should recognise that as all students are individuals, their learning may call for different approaches, different resourcing, and different goals” (p. 39, emphasis added).
The main obstacle faced by students with disabilities in the attempt to achieve educational equality is the continuing debate over the In...
The idea of inclusion within a classroom tends to breed controversy from many people. Currently there is no clear consensus on a definition of inclusion (Heward, 2006). There are many different views on how students with disabilities should be handled. Those views ranged from students being fully included, partially included, or not included at all in mainstream schooling. Different descriptions of inclusion tend to reflect the person's own opinions towards it. People who feel students should not be included in the classroom focus on the negative characteristics of inclusion, such as the challenges of developing plans for students as well as the hard work it requires to incorporate those plans. However, studies show that full inclusion has many benefits to the students, for both students with disabilities as well as students without them. Inclusion has shown to improve the student's social skills, encourage communication, inspire laws and regulations, and improve the overall schooling experience (Gargiulo, 2012). Although it will take longer then some would like or have the patience for, full inclusion can be done in the classroom, with its benefits outweighing the hard work that it requires.
As a new teacher preparing to embark upon what I hope will be a long-lasting, rewarding career in education, I want to create an inclusive, stimulating and collegial climate in my classroom. I plan to make sure that all my students feel valued, and contribute actively to the knowledge, interactions, learning and interests shared by the class. However, I appreciate that as a new, inexperienced teacher I could encounter or unintentionally create barriers that undermine my vision of an inclusive classroom. Although systems will operate in any school setting that can help or hinder inclusive practices, I believe it is my responsibility to ensure that every student in my care has high aspirations, and experiences success at school regardless of the school context.
Some proponents have argued that inclusion is not limited to children with special needs, but is also about changes within the school climate to ensure that no one is left out (Runswick‐Cole, 2011). The Ministries of Education in Alberta and Newfoundland and Labrador assert that inclusive education goes beyond providing support to students with special needs. According to the Alberta Education (2017), inclusion is considered as “an attitude and approach that embraces diversity and learner differences and promotes equal opportunities for all learners” (n. p). The Department of Education and Early Childhood Development in Newfoundland and Labrador (2016) noted that an inclusive education is not limited to the mere inclusion of students with special needs in the classroom environment. “The goal of inclusive education is that students are included in all aspects of the learning environment regardless of any facet of diversity” (n. p.).
A person may be disabled if they are impaired, either mentally or physically under a range of health conditions. This renders them unable to perform certain duties and be dependent on support from other people. This outlines the traditional perspective whereby some people consider the disabled as a strain to resources on the fringe society and thus a burden for the non-disabled people. The society through its stereotypes, prejudice, and attitudes of disablism by itself disables people from acquiring equal opportunities in the society. Intellectual disability, for example, is commonly conceptualized as a stigmatized identity that one has to live the authors of the publications read emphasized on the identities and social roles of the people with an intellectual disability.
In Australia, teachers must be familiar with the many federal and state laws, regulations, and frameworks, which apply to inclusive education. At a national level, the following Acts and Standards protect students: the Commonwealth (Cwlth) Anti-Discrimination Act 2004; Cwlth Disability Discrimination Act 1992; Racial Discrimination Act 1975; Cwlth Sex Discrimination Act 1984; Human Rights Commission Act 1986; Australia’s ratific...
Inclusion has become increasingly important in education in recent years, with the Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act being passed in 2004 to ensure equality in our system. In summary, inclusion is the idea of there being no child...
To begin with, full inclusion in the education system for people with disabilities should be the first of many steps that are needed to correct the social injustices that people with disabilities currently face. Students with disabilities are far too frequently isolated and separated in the education system (Johnson). They are often provided a diluted, inferior education and denied meaningful opportunities to learn. There are many education rights for children with disabilities to p...
Inclusion has roots in human rights and social justice (Head, 2011). If we move beyond the perception of inclusion as a special education concern and beyond perceiving those to be included as those with disabilities, then there is potential to challenge and transform far more within schools and society. Booth and Ainscow 2011 identify inclusion in education as an aspect of inclusion in society, and it is about social and academic participation and achievement, but not presence. This suggests if teachers educate pupils to acknowledge and appreciate differences within school, they can be inclusive within society; and it is about whole class interaction. The Equality Act 2010
Prior to Introduction to Inclusive Education, I viewed people with disabilities from the separation perspective. They were the obvious group of individuals, the people motioning down the street with canes, walking with obedient guide dogs, parking within the blue lines, sitting in the reserved seats at the front of the bus, staring in the designated section to see the sign language interpretation, and the people who simply didn’t blend in with the rest. People with disabilities were different and incapable to perform like others; or if they could perform, they needed assistance at all times. I held this viewpoint, not because I wanted to, but because society played a critical role in my outlook.