Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of culture in education
Value of culture in education
Value of culture in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Katie Finley
Journal 3
PART ONE
While reading the Windschitl & Hirsch articles, I felt both informed and interested on the different positions on the main question. The main question asks about if schools should have their own educational constructivist approach. The article written by Windschitl agrees having an educational constructivist approach, while Hirsch on the other hand disagrees. Each other others did a wonderful job on elaborating their positions on the point, and provided excellent examples, and great detail. Each of these articles exhibited both similarities and differences regarding the main question.
One of the similarities, which both Windschitl and Hirsch share is about there are challenges that exist in an educational
…show more content…
One reason that I believe they are is, because they have two very different views on the question. I believe the only major similarity they have is they recognize and mention the negative aspects of both this approach and the previous ones. Winschitl does elaborate more on the expectations on how the positives of this approach will help student’s teacher centered/ fact based thinking, but holds a such a crucial part in developing students actual thinking and processing of information. Hirsch dwells on how he disagrees with this point of Windschitl’s, because he fails to recognizes the research regarding this approach. These two hold such contrasting opinions on this question. They both make a case on the points very well, but they hold fewer similarities on the question at …show more content…
This reading reminded me about how Vygotsky’s theory is mostly based on the interactions and influences help children to learn. I really do believe this theory is very accurate, because students can learn from each other. If a teacher is having trouble explaining a complex topic to a student, another student can explain it in more relatable way. Also, I was fascinated when I read about what cultural tools, were and how they related to Vygotsky’s beliefs. Learning about what cultural tools were, helped me to broaden my understanding of how crucial cultural tools are to student’s learning process. Also, the chapter did a great job of elaborating on how these tools can help to advance and grow in the understanding of student’s thinking process. Another aspect of this reading that interested me was the elaboration on private speech and the Zone of Proximal Development. Each of the definitions displayed help me to advance my own thinking on what it was and how it is used in regards to the education of students. The description of what private speech and how it is basically the inner narration of their thinking process helped me to understand how this aspect can help with students learning. Also, the Zone of Proximal Development helped me to make a connection to both what is and how it relates to private speech as well. The Zone of proximal development plays a crucial role in the
In Eugene F. Provenzo Jr.’s article “Hirsch’s Desire for a National Curriculum,” the main focus is on how E. D. Hirsch Jr. believed that our nation needed a very clear set of curriculum standa...
Schwarz is vocalized by Sugar after the children have examined the store closely, noted the exorbitant price tags and pieced together how money is involved in their lives. Consequently, Bambara has shown that they could not come to this realization without Miss Moore, “haling two cabs, like it was nothing” and bringing the children see with their own eyes, things they could not imagine (Bambara). In the article “Teaching Children to Think” Joel Westheimer is passionate about education, and enhancing student’s critical thinking skills. He delivers a personal narrative that recounts his experience struggling to teach thinking skills to an especially rough student in his class that is very similar to Sylvia. He taught middle school in New York City and vividly recalls the challenge of working with students who are hard pressed to cooperate with his teaching agenda and have a limited view of the world around them. He wizens to their schemes to outwit him, and he even comes up with one of his own that creates profound thoughts in the minds of his students. Westheimer’s experience with the reluctant student, Archeem, showed him how to create a learning environment that is engaging to those kinds of kids. While trying to turn students into thinkers, he realizes students will learn more when the lesson is not just presented for the memorization of facts. Westheimer’s insight is students may not develop the
What is more important to education? The content or the how the content is taught? Many policy makers today believe that the former is far more crucial to the development of our youth. With high-stakes testing and an entire industry of textbooks and test making, the current system places empirical results over all else. Unfortunately, this approach only helps with the lower levels on the depths of knowledge (DOK) and Bloom’s Taxonomy charts. It only helps with basic recall of facts and knowledge. A second area of concern with this type of teaching is that only instills one point of view in the pupils. This is also problematic for diverse classrooms with students from various backgrounds. Would an approach that reinforces critical thinking and higher levels of DOK be more appropriate? A technique that incorporates the diversity of the classroom and life experiences of those students can be explained by Christopher Emdin and Django Paris who are two advocates of Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy or Reality Pedagogy.
Vygotsky believes that a child’s cognitive development originates in socialization activities, and then goes through a process of increasing individuation. He argued that self-directed speech did not show any cognitive immaturity, but did show some form of development. He claims that private speech represents a functional differentiation in the speech of a child, or that a child begins to differentiate between speech that is directed towards the others and speech that is self-directed.
Gredler, M. (2012). Understanding Vygotsky for the Classroom: Is It Too Late?. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 113-131. doi:10.
Another similarity between Carl Roger and Jean Piaget would that be an individual is in control of their own learning. If an individual wants to learn it is their responsibility to do the work and participate in their own learning process. Carl Rogers and Jean Piaget both believed that the environment played an important role in learning. Carl Rogers believed that in order to learn the environment should be a safe non-threatnening environment. Jean Piaget believed that the environment was important in adaption of a person, meaning a person would adapt to the environment around them. Jean Piaget was a strong believer in adaptation. Adaptation is important because Jean Piaget believed that a child was able to pick up certain things from the environment and learn and adapt using what they picked
Lev Vygotsky stages of development were not defined by age or biology. Social and cultural experiences were the basis for his theory. Consciousness was an end product of social interactions (Kearsley, 1994-2010). The history of the child’s society and his own personal history determine how the child thinks. Language is crucial for development as it is with words that a child conceptualizes and makes sense of the world (Schütz, 2004). A precept of Vygotsky’s theory wa...
Vygotsky placed much more emphasis on language that Piaget (book). Vygotsky’s theory focuses on the role of interpersonal processes and the role of the child’s community and culture which provide a framework from which the child’s construction of meaning develops (book). Although Vygotsky stressed that the process must be in in the context of the child’s culture and the tools available within that culture. Vygotsky was always especially interested in cognitive processes which underline understanding which has led to the concept of shared understandings that occur when people communicate with each other. Vygotsky argued that through the use of language formed through social interaction a child can develop as a thinker and a learner (book). As a conscious individual people could not accomplish very much without the aids and tools within their culture such as language (book). Piaget argued that language was strongly influenced by the underlying cognitive structures within the individual child (book). They also disagreed on the egocentric speech of children. When observing children Piaget concluded that half of the mistakes children made was down to egocentric speech which he argued showed that children have not tried to communicate with another or adapted so others can understand them he also argued that young children did not seem to care if anyone else could understand them and
Lev Semenovich Vygotsky, a Constructive Learning theorist, was born and raised in a small Russian village called Orscha. He grew up in a well-educated family, where his father was a banker. Throughout his early childhood, Vygotsky was tutored at home by a paid teacher. It wasn’t until he was a junior in high school when Vygotsky had his first experience with public schools. Vygotsky was always an exceptional student who enjoyed spending his free time writing.
Having a good understanding of both of these can have a huge impact on my career. Using these and understanding the students that are in my class, I will be able to better connect and understand what they might be going through. It was very interesting to see the difference between the two.
Teachers have a very challenging job. The teachers in the texts being compared are very different people. The texts "Students" and "Crow Lake" illustrate the struggles certain teachers face. How they haddle these issues. Also, how teaching takes more then just intelligence.
The third chapter of The Aims of Education, entitled "The Rhythmic Claims of Freedom and Discipline," is where I find the essence of Whitehead's educational philosophy. This philosophy, I shall argue, is simply a reiteration in educational language of the core principles of his general philosophy as stated in Process and Reality and in Science and the Modern World.
Hirsch references many great thinkers including Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Dewey, Plato and Samuel Johnson. Overall, there were two main conflicting arguments of education. One side argues that there are specific information that should be taught to children. The other side argues against it and instead, children will eventually learn from their own experiences. Hirsch critiques
Rhinehart Neas, Linda M., ed. "Constructivist Theory: Pros and Cons." Bright Hub Education. N.p., 6 Jun 2012. Web. 31 Jan 2014. <, eds. "Constructivist Learning Theory: Pros & Cons." Bright Hub Education. N.p., 6 Jun 2012. Web. 31 Jan 2014. . >.
Similarly, the Onion article also explains the struggles of a teacher whose students write down everything she says without question, even if the information was strange or obscure. This is not learning. If Vygotsky’s theory of socio-cultural foundations of learning fits best in a classroom setting then questions need to be raised on that side of the argument. What does this theory say in response to the passive exchange of information from teacher to