Victoria Braithwaite's Hooked On A Myth

497 Words1 Page

To most people, animals are merely things for us humans to use as we see fit, for food, fashion and etc. This opinion of animals is not only insensitive and apathetic but also false. In addition, scientists and philosophers are saying that we humans are avoiding the thought of animals feeling the same pain that we do. In "Hooked on a Myth" by Victoria Braithwaite claims that fish are just as much liable to pain as humans are and raise an much doubt about whether or not fish should be treated with more mercy. As human beings who're capable of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain such as suffering, it may be time to treat marine life with more compassion as we do with other animals. It's unacceptable to just unashamedly ignore that fish "more than simple automata" (14). I think it's important to take into account Braithwaite's argument to find more humane ways to lock up the approach with captured fish if we were to continue to apply them as most people do now.


Easily because fish don’t necessarily have a significant way of expressing their pain, …show more content…

As some test is shown according to the article “Do fish have feelings? Maybe…” by Sonia Planellas, a student at the University of Stirling introduces a study that scientist are looking more into is the Zebrafish Test. In this test, they observe the behaviors of zebrafish under the situation of being confined in a net and then being released and seeing where those stressed fish would end up in the tempered waters. Pinellas quotes, “ The stressed fish spent more time in the warm waters and their body temperatures had risen by between 2°C and 4°C – and that emotional fever was the cause.” The purpose of this experiment was that fish are conscious when they are in danger to the point that their body temperature rose which they knew what was going

Open Document