Unified Land Operations Research Paper

Unified land operations are part of the Army's war fighting doctrine. It explains how the Army seizes, retains, and exploits the initiative to gain or maintain a position of relative advantage in land operations through offensive, defensive, and stability operations simultaneously. This is used in order to prevent conflict. In comparison; Mission command is the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land operations.
In a time of declining budgets the Army must make difficult decisions as to how to protect America’s security interest and role as not only global but regional as well. With new dangers and the unpredictability of our global environment, the question becomes how can the Army “Set conditions to expand when called on” given the current drawdown and limited environment? In response to this particular question, the Army will not need to expand after the drawdown to restructure the

total force. Soldiers should train, and develop at the lowest operation levels and leverage technological advantages of future combat systems to empower the force as a whole.
The Army plans to decentralize combat power to the lowest unit level. Therefore; creating a more adaptive force capable of achieving regional alignment through mission training would be ideal. The force comprised of empowered Soldiers and leaders will be proficient in culture, politics, and the fundamental aspects of unified land operations. Having leaders that can make sound decisions will decrease the need to rely on a large Army to fight an unconventional enemy.
Critical thinking also becomes a vital role when decisive actions need to be taken where it is guided by mission command. The development of these particular thinking skills has been a success for the Unites States Army. As the military entered into a new era of war fighting, critical thinking has become essential to help Army forces function effectively and accomplish missions within a mission command structure. Commanders and Leaders at all levels have adopted different decision-making practices. This research paper will present the role of critical thinking and how it facilitates understanding and support the different decision-making approaches in a mission command structure. Creative thinking will lead to new insights, perspectives, and new ways of understanding things. In this case, commanders and leaders are able to better understand and support their decision making approach.
Due to an unpredictable financial and global environment, downsizing is necessary. A large Army has become unsustainable and requires change. Smaller decentralized units with increased training and technological capabilities along with an emphasizes on Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Multinational (JIIM) partnerships will allow the United States of America to preserve its strategic plans and remain a global nation.
How the Army seizes, retains, and exploits the initiative to gain and maintain a position of relative advantage in sustained land operations through simultaneous offensive, defensive, and stability operations in order to prevent or deter conflict, prevail in war, and create the conditions for favorable conflict.

An army without unified land operations would fail
Unified land operations are part of the Army's war fighting doctrine. It explains how the Army seizes, retains, and exploits the initiative to gain or maintain a position of relative advantage in land operations through offensive, defensive, and stability operations simultaneously. This is used in order to prevent conflict. In comparison; Mission command is the exercise of authority and direction by the commander using mission orders to enable disciplined initiative within the commander’s intent to empower adaptive leaders in the conduct of unified land

operations.
In a time of declining budgets the Army must make difficult decisions as to how to protect America’s security interest and role as not only global but regional as well. With new dangers and the unpredictability of our global environment, the question becomes how can the Army “Set conditions to expand when called on” given the current drawdown and limited environment? In response to this particular question, the Army will not need to expand after the drawdown once it leverages two aspects in the restructure the total force. Soldiers should train, and develop at the lowest operation levels and leverage technological advantages of future combat systems to empower the force as a whole.
The Army plans to decentralize combat power to the lowest unit level. Therefore; creating a more adaptive force capable of achieving regional alignment through mission training would be ideal. The force comprised of empowered Soldiers and leaders will be proficient in culture, politics, and the fundamental aspects of unified land operations. Having leaders that can make sound decisions will decrease the need to rely on a large Army to fight an unconventional enemy.
Critical thinking also becomes a vital role when decisive actions need to be taken where it is guided by mission command. The development of these particular thinking skills has been a success for the Unites States Army. As the military entered into a new era of war fighting, critical thinking has become essential to help Army forces function effectively and accomplish missions within a mission command structure. Commanders and Leaders at all levels have adopted different decision-making practices. This research paper will present the role of critical thinking and how it facilitates understanding and support the different decision-making approaches in a mission command structure.
Critical thinking and creative thinking is applied when commanders and leaders need to understand the mission and are drawn to make effective decisions. “Critical thinking examines a problem in depth from multiple points of view (ADRP 6-0, 2-7).” If we utilize the same solutions, an enemy will acknowledge, adapt and overcome the solution. Creative thinking will lead to new insights, perspectives, and new ways of understanding things. In this case, commanders and leaders are able to better understand and support their decision making approach.
In conclusion, unified land operations describes how the army seizes, retains, and exploits the initiative to gain and maintain a position of relative advantage in sustained land operations through simultaneous offensive, defensive, and stability operations in order to prevent or deter conflict, prevail in war, and create the conditions for favorable conflict. An army without unified land operations would fail due to lack of planning.