Trust In Shattered Glass Film

1381 Words3 Pages

Trust is built by both ways between people and people. “Shattered glass” movie is about journalist wrote the articles but without reliability. Stephen Glass is popular guys in his “New Republic” company and his editor trusted he wrote. But Michael was the editor then was been fired and replaced by Chuck who is younger than Michael. Moreover, Michael is really kind for his subordinates and defended for them too. However, another online journalist company editor blamed about one of journalists why not know about “ Heaven hacker” material, then the journalist found out that none of information is true or cannot be found in any sources. Then, the other company called to “New republic” declare that there were some false facts from Heaven hacker …show more content…

The main issue in the relationship between his editor and colleagues and Stephen are they trust him as the reliable person and also believed his professional area can be counted on. However, even in the professional area, people have the trust for people but still being journalist did not mean that lose the professional attitude or mortality. However, on the surface, Stephen is good at social and also lots of people thought he was a talent and entertained journalist. But under that mask, he just wanted to be successful and proved to his parents that he had the passion and good at to be a journalist. In the fact, I did not think that he did not have any professional mortality, he knew which right or wrong is. But he tried to prove himself to people and his parents or just too lazy to actually found the sources because the facts maybe be boring. The success maybe the main reason that Stephen wanted to write the all these frictional articles because they were created by the imagination than actually facts, it is more interesting than actually news fact. Which will be more interesting? The human imagination stories or the trivia in our detail lives. However, in the movie, Stephen mentioned that the biggest loop for the sources are no one knew the actually stuff expect the journalist only. The self-centered thought is in his mind that actually reflect his act. In his world, he convinced himself that all his done is right and thought that everything can be cover by his hands. As my percept, Stephen can totally fend off all these situation by telling the truth to the editor without being fire. But he still declared that he was right about the fact he wrote even the truth showed in front of him. If he actually told the truth, he maybe still in the “New republic” even just suspend, it would not ruin his whole career in

Open Document