Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Modern world history world war 2
Consequences of the Truman doctrine
Essay on truman doctrine
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Modern world history world war 2
After World War II, Western Europe was an incredibly tense and economically destroyed part of the world. A key quote that was reported to have been used by Lenin was “Who has Germany, has Europe” (Best et al. 2008, p216) Initially, before the Cold War started, the two key super powers, the United States alongside their Western allies, such as Britain for example, and the USSR divided Germany into two separate states, East and West Germany (Calvocoressi, 2001) and as Calvocoressi (2001) mentions, there were disagreements and concerns from both sides over the structure of Germany. In terms of America’s leadership of the West in the first three decades of the Cold War, the achievements that they had were with the institutions that were formed, and economic policies based on Western values, which will be covered in this essay. These are …show more content…
the Truman Doctrine and the containment in Europe, the Marshall Plan, and institutions such as NATO, which will be covered in relevant order. After this, there will be criticisms of America’s leadership, to get a broad view on both sides of the picture. For the first achievement that America had whilst under leadership of the West, in the events leading up to Truman’s speech to Congress, which inevitably brought forward the Truman Plan, in February 1947, Britain notified the United States, that they were unable to provide any further financial support to the governments of Greece and Turkey. This was because the British had their own problems and debts to deal with, after World War Two. The problem was with Turkey, the Soviets wanted to expand their control and they did this by Stalin justifying in the conferences that happened in Yalta and Potsdam, that the security of the USSR would be predominantly better if they had control of Turkey, and the Straits of the Dardanelles (Merrill, 2006,p.31). During these conferences, because negotiations failed, Stalin decided to place troops near the border of Turkey, and created an extent of panic and because of such Turkey turned to Washington to help them. On the other hand, with Greece, they went through a period of having civil war and cases where politicians weren’t running the country properly, and as of such, their economic downfall took a serious turn, because of Nazi Germany withdrawing from the country in 1944. The problem with this though, when Britain tried to change the Greek government so that it would actually improve the situation that they were in, this is where Greek communism took hold, and rebelled against the government, eventually causing a bigger civil war. This led to Greek rebels receiving help from the communist countries that were next to Greece, these being what was formerly Yugoslavia, Albania and Bulgaria. (Merrill, 2006, p.31) Because of this, and the situation that was arising, Truman addressed congress in what was to be the biggest speech to be given to Congress.
It lasted 18 minutes, and as Merrill (Merrill, 2006,p.1) mentions in the abstract of the article, with a short quote, Truman pledged to the United States that they would “assist free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures” (Merrill,2006, p.1). And thus, the Truman Doctrine was created. This did two things; one was that it gave aid to Greece and Turkey in the form of military and economic help, as Truman had requested to give $400 million for the two countries. What this also did was that it created a containment of communism within Europe, even though they initially didn’t make it out for this to be the case, and tried to make sure that the communism didn’t spread within the West, and this showed that the US didn’t want the Soviets to expand their influence in Europe. This was a massive change in US foreign policy, and it later defined their Cold War policies, and the concerns of what would have happened if communism had expanded. (Merrill,
2006). During this time, another achievement of America’s leadership of the West came to light, and thus began the rise of the Marshall Plan, and this would be created to provide economic relief for Europe.
Presidents Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower shared many similarities yet still many differences when it came to Cold War foreign policies. Truman’s foreign policies revolved around the Truman Doctrine, which stated that the United States would financially support Greece and Turkey . Despite Truman’s and Eisenhower’s differing political parties, the foreign policies of the presidents shared several similarities. The main differences between the two presidents can be attributed to differing circumstances during their years in office. Both Truman and Eisenhower sought to eliminate communism and support civil rights, but Truman emphasized international relations and the American economy while Eisenhower dealt more with domestic issues around civil rights.
There are many opinions surrounding the question: Was the decision by Truman to drop the atomic bomb ultimately the right or wrong decision? Not only can this question be answered in many different ways, it can be interpreted in many different ways as well. Overall, Truman ultimately made the right decision to drop the atomic bomb. This can be supported by the fact that the atomic bomb helped prevent the deaths of American troops, saved the lives of foreign citizens, and in comparison the atomic bomb was not as destructive as the firebombing in Tokyo.
After World War II, Europe emerged as a continent torn between two very different political ideologies, Communism and Democracy. As the two major superpowers, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United States, struggled to defend their respective governmental policies, the European Continent was caught in an intrinsic struggle to preserve the autonomy which had taken so long to achieve. During the Cold War, Eastern European nations struggled to achieve autonomy with the help of the West's dedication to break the Soviet sphere of influence. After the disintegration of the USSR, the struggle for autonomy among nations shifted from an intense, inward, nationalistic struggle to break away from a superpower to a commitment of international unity and cooperation as nations began to take moral and political responsibility for their actions.
Harry Truman known as for having a heroic presidency served our country as the 33rd president of the United States after the death of Franklin Roosevelt in April. Truman only had a high school education and was only vice president for 82 days before the passing of FDR. He had inherited the huge tasks of leading the United States through the end of World War II and the beginning of the Cold War. Truman’s legacy as the nation’s leader is on point of controversial decisions.
2 Charles S. Maier, ed., The Cold War in Europe: Era of a divided Continent (New York: Markus Wiener Publishing, Inc., 1991) 27.
The Truman Doctrine was a policy under the United States of America. It was established in 1947 by President Harry Truman which is how it got the name The “Truman” Doctrine. This policy more or less meant that the United States would follow an interventialist foreign method to manage and end communism. This doctrine was a straight-forward warning made to the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics that the United States would move in to protect any nation that was being threatened or endangered by a minority with weapons. The doctrine pretty much called out and warned the USSR, however the USSR was never actually stated by name in the doctrine.
Despite strong opposition from a Republican congress, Truman attempted to extend Roosevelt's New Deal policies by strengthening social security, conservation, implementing rent controls, and providing housing to low-income families. At times, however, Truman was inconsistent with his own party's beliefs and the ideal of the New Deal in order to suit the immediate situation and retain public support. Furthermore, Truman supported civil rights actions and for the first time, increased the political status of African American citizens. Truman's various other reforms were much like the proposals of Roosevelt, but the mood of the nation due to its affluence and that of Congress opposed his efforts and the changing times proved that Truman's Fair Deal was not as necessary as FDR's New Deal.
I enjoyed your post and agree that the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan were both major foreign policies. In addition to President Truman’s efforts to support democracy he also didn’t want to risk losing access to the Middle East. Like you mentioned “Soviets were trying to get Turkey to allow them access to a waterway linking the two nearby seas.” President Truman’s actions prevented the Soviets from controlling the waterway and helped prevent communism.
The Soviet Union and Eastern Europe became the East nations, and the United States, centered on NATO formed the West nations, dividing the world in two. Belonging to neither the East nor the West, developing countries were called Third World nations and became a stand-in for wars between the East and West (Gaddis, The Strategies of Containment 70-78). The end of WWII and the beginning of the C... ... middle of paper ... ... a, from containment to rollback in Korea; welcoming European integration because it portended the creation of an economic unit that encouraged technological innovation; building a configuration of power in the international system, nurturing free markets while safeguarding American interests, a constant in Washington for more than 35 years; and, free political economy at home were just a few of the strategic methods used to change, influence, and shape American domestic policy (Leffler, The Specter of Communism,100-129).
Moreover, it served as a precedent for future U.S. policy of interventionism. According to Stephen Ambrose, an important quote from Truman’s speech, "I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free people who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures," stands as "all encompassing" and would "define American policy for the next generation and beyond." "1 Faced with strong opposition, Truman was still able to achieve a consensus in Congress aimed at quelling the communist threat through active foreign policy and involvement. The Truman Doctrine not only demonstrates the new foreign policy of the U.S., but also helps explain American foreign policy since the Doctrine’s inception. At the end of World War II, the military and foreign policies of the White House were moving in opposite directions.
However, when confronted with a strict policy of appeasement, by both the French and the English, the stage was set for a second World War. Taylor constructs a powerful and effective argument by expelling certain dogmas that painted Hitler as a madman, and by evaluating historical events as a body of actions and reactions, disagreeing with the common idea that the Axis had a specific program from the start. The book begins with the conclusion of the First World War, by exploring the idea that critical mistakes made then made a second war likely, yet not inevitable. Taylor points out that although Germany was defeated on the Western front, “Russia fell out of Europe and ceased to exist, for the time being, as a Great Power. The constellation of Europe was profoundly changed—and to Germany’s advantage.”
The end of World War II presented an opportunity for Winston Churchill to regain some of the power and influence that the Imperialistic British Empire once possessed. Churchill took advantage of the trust and respect that the American public and President Truman shared about his character. He saw Truman's lack of political experience as an opportunity to restore British imperial authority. Winston Churchill tainted Harry Truman's beliefs and preservations about Russia, because his personal agenda and imperial policy where vital to the supremacy of the British Empire. Churchill manipulated Truman and the American public. He caused them to believe that Russia was a legitimate threat to the free world, thus he created the origins of the Cold War.
Therefore, he asked for 400 million dollars to aid them. He wanted to send troops to the countries to help them control war inside and outside the country. Politically he felt that the US was the only country that had the power to support free people who needed help. In this case the Soviet Union felt that if the US could support Greece and Turkey they could help them too. The Doctrine was made a year after Joseph Stalin reply to Churchill, at this time the Soviet Union was still struggling.
The division of Germany into West Germany and East Germany emerged as a stopgap solution for the woeful state of the nation following its defeat in the Second World War. With the United States (US) ultimately gaining full control over West Germany, East Germany increasingly became alienated towards it, as it went under the influence of the Soviet Union (USSR). West Germany, officially the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG), rapidly grew into one of the most politically and economically influential nations in Europe representing the democratic interests of the US in the region, while East Germany, officially the German Democratic Republic (GDR), went seemingly the other way. East Germans became increasingly disillusioned by the way their politicians have promoted communism in the GDR, characterized by oppressive measures and sheer inequality in living standards. The Stasi, the secret police unit of the GDR, closely monitored East Germans and purged those who are suspected or proven dissidents, while politicians of the nation enjoyed living standards that are way superior compared to the average East German. West Germans, on the other hand, enjoyed the benefits of political and economic reforms brought forth by the democratic influence of the US. Therefore, discontentment among East Germans increased the prospect of unification of the FRG and GDR – an issue that was never written off in consideration, only further complicated by political differences. Nevertheless, eventual unification of the FRG and GDR following the symbolic collapse of the Berlin Wall did not completely result to favorable circumstances, as problems that continued to alienate matters between the Western and Eastern sections of Germany remain unresolved (Brockman ...
The end of the Second World War brought about great change in the world. This was especially true in Europe, where some battles left areas completely devastated. With Hitler regime fallen, it was clear the leaders of not only European nations but other nations like the United States wanted to change the structure of land that was once occupied by the Nazi army. The U.S. and Western Bloc would be in a chess match over this land with the Soviet Union and the Western Bloc. This chess match is better known as the Cold War. The following paragraphs will discuss how this war where no blood was shed played out throughout Europe. These paragraphs will examine and provide examples of how the Cold War created a new a set of geopolitical, social and economic relationships throughout the continent as well as which of these factors was of most importance.