Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Significance of transformational and transactional leadership style
Transformational Leadership: Future Challenges and Applications
Transformational &Transactional leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Transactional vs. Transformational Leadership One of the most important aspects in management is leadership because it is a major factor that significantly contributes to the overall wellbeing of organizations and countries. Some examples of organizations that have increasingly benefited from effective leadership include General Electric and Chrysler that have transformed into the most profitable organizations worldwide from the verge of bankruptcy. Moreover, the United States and Britain are prominent nations in the world whose growth and popularity has been fueled by effective leadership (Odumeru & Ifeanyi, 2013, p.355). The success of these organizations and countries has been based on the ability of their leaders to influence people …show more content…
He constantly developed mechanisms for promoting open communication with his co-workers and paid close attention to them in order to avoid being a dictatorial leader. Consequently, President John Kennedy enjoyed a wide range of talents and personalities from his co-workers and followers that contributed to his effective leadership during his shortened presidency. Despite being skilled in transactional leadership style, President John Kennedy largely employed transformational leadership approaches in handling great challenges or issues he encountered (Clark, 2009, …show more content…
Transformational leadership is more strongly rooted in the personal value systems of the leader because it is centered on intrinsic motivation or individual inspiration that is in turn extrapolate to followers through effective communication mechanisms. The personal value systems and characteristics of the transformational leader can motivate followers without the exchange of incentives or use of punishment that characterizes transactional leadership. Therefore, transformational leaders are largely distinguished from transactional leaders through various personality
General consensus is that Erik posses two of the four factors to be a transformational leader, he had the inspiration and intellectual stimulation, “he is lacking charisma and individualized consideration” (Goodman, 1). With great guidance...
The concept of transformational leadership relies on appropriate leadership approaches for mission success. AFDD 1-1 describes three leadership competencies: person, people/team, organization Effective leaders (tactical level) need to build face-to-face and interpersonal relationships that directly influence behavior and values. Effective leaders (operational level) need to build team dynamics for small groups and squadrons. Effective leaders (strategic level) need to build strategy and provide direction in a broad spectrum.
It is concerned with emotions, values, ethics, standards, and long-term goals. It motivates a form of intelligence that moves followers to accomplish more of what is expected of them. (Northouse, 2016, pg.161). Transformational leadership can be used to influence people on a one to one level or to influence whole organizations and cultures. There’s a difference between transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Transactional leadership focuses more on leaders that uses gimmicks or promotions to get their followers to do certain things that they want. Transformational leadership, on the other hand, focuses more on connecting leaders with followers or employees to motivate and help them reach their full
According to Riggio (2009), the most popular theory of leadership is transformational. Many believe that these leaders get the job done through inspiring, modeling, and helping others develop their skills as leaders. Research provides clear evidence that groups lead by transformational leaders have higher levels of performance and satisfaction than groups led by other types of leaders (Riggio, 2009). Clear communication is vital to transformational leadership and in order to succeed further, one will need to work on their own skills, and set aside time and space for personal development (Manktelow, 2005).
Transformational leadership theory conceptualized in the late 1970’s, proposed that leaders could motivate followers through shared vision and mutual interest to uplift the entire organization to a higher morality (Burns, 1978). Morality was defined as leaders and followers working together to fulfill organizational goals and achieve higher performances within a context of change and innovation. Leaders would surpass their own self-interest, in order to, foresee, foster, and indoctrinate a new organizational vision to their followers. Bass operationalized Burns’ seminal work into a leadership model to better indentify transformational leadership characteristics. The model emphasized four dimensions such as idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration in order to achieve success.
In Leadership Theory, Application & Skill Development, transformational leadership is defined as “seeking to change the status quo by articulating to followers the problems in the current system and presenting a compelling vision of what a new organization could be” (Lussier & Achua, 2013, p.331). This theory, in combination with the exercise regimen, CrossFit, is the focus of the book Transformational Leadership and High-Intensity Interval Training by Carol R. Himelhoch, PhD. Himelhoch illustrates a correlation between a leader’s ability to tap into the transformational leadership style and their consistent participation in intense workout sessions. A transformational leadership style benefits from High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) via challenging the participant, which imparts a sense of achievement when they complete a demanding Workout of the Day (WOD). HIIT encourages the individual to push themselves and take risks, not only during the workout, but also in their leadership roles at work.
If we compare these two types of leadership, we can see that they have many differences. Firstly, transactional leaders appeal to the self-interest of employees who seek out rewards for themselves, in contrast to transformational leaders, who appeal to group interests and notions of organizational success. Secondly, transactional leaders work within an organizational culture, while transformational leaders make new ideas and therefore "transform" organizational culture. Thirdly, transactional leadership reacts to problems as they arise, whereas transformational leadership is more likely to address issues before they become problematic. Finally, transactional leaders reward and punish in traditional ways according to organizational standards; transformational leaders attempt to achieve positive results from employees by keeping
listens to the various viewpoints in order to be able to develop a spirit of cooperation;
Tom Rath explains in his book, StrenghtsFinder 2.0 (2007), that identifying and capitalizing on one’s strengths makes for a more fulfilled and effective employee, further benefitting the employing organization. Rath states that when in a position not utilizing our strengths, we are six times more likely to be disengaged in our work. Studies show that this disengagement or dissatisfaction carries over into our personal lives affecting our health and personal relationships.
Allisyn Coghlan Mr. Klett LA3 5 Dec. 2017 Washington and King as Aspiring Leaders: The Power of Transformational Leadership During the different stages of history, people have had well-defined traits that make them great leaders. As a matter of fact, there are four separate leadership styles used, and they are as follows: great man, situational, transformational and transactional. Overall, transformational leaders have characteristics that stand out and they have positive outcomes.
Tucker, Bruce A. ; Russell, Robert F., “The influence of the transformational leader”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2004. (http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-2375126_ITM) viewed 5.05.2008
According to Yoder-Wise (2015), a leader can be defined as, “an individual who works with others to develop a clear vision of the preferred future and to make that vision happen” (p 35). As employees, we often have our own ideal of a good leader, which may be influenced by experiences and perception of workplace norms. While one’s opinion of an effective leader may vary, there are several recognized leadership theories. The following will focus on the transformational leadership approach.
Transformational leadership is one of the most popular leadership styles. According to Kendrick (2011), “Transformational leadership involves four factors: 1. idealized influence, 2. inspirational motivation, 3. intellectual stimulation, and 4. individual consideration.” These four factors make transformational leadership have an impact on followers. The goal of transformational leadership is to cause a positive change in individuals, help motivate them, and develop a leader within each individual.
Initially, transactional and transformational leadership are different in terms of implementation and its outcomes. However, transformational leadership was developed from transactional leadership (Downton, 1973). Bass (1985) defined transactional leadership as an exchange activity that leaders execute to motivate subordinates in order to achieve their tasks by giving out reward or punishment correspond with their performance. Additionally, active and passive management by exception are taken into account when it comes to misconception and faults. Bass (1985) stated that transformational leadership emphasizes the value of subordinates, encourages them to perform extra effort, and assures their comprehension on organization’s goals and objectives. Besides, idealised influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulatio...
Transformational leaders are needed to transform low performing organizations to acceptable to high performance. At other times, the leader is expected to move an organization from a crisis. In order to accomplish these tasks, the leader must overhaul the organization culture or subculture. This task is accomplished by nine ways of transforming others: 1. Raise others awareness. The leader makes others aware of the rewards and how to achieve them, i.e. pride in the job or financial incentives. 2. Help others look beyond self-interest. The transformational leader helps others to look at the “big picture” by describing an entire scenario, i.e. if we hire more employees to do x, we will have to make cuts in other areas. 3. Help people find self-fulfillment. The leader helps others not to focus on minor satisfactions, i.e. getting a job done before the deadline ...