Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does leadership affect our society
Reflection essay on transformational leadership
A Critique Of Transformational Leadership Theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Analysis of Issues
After the interview with Ms. Howland, it was realized that this is not an ordinary leader. Although her function does require her to demonstrate elements of transactional leadership during the conduct of an average day in her work environment, it became obvious that there was more to her leadership style. Ms. Howland demonstrated the use of transformational leadership as a way of motivating and inspiring her team and those around her. Throughout her nine years at Crescent Point Energy, Ms. Howland has been the driving force behind many changes during the company’s evolution from a small to intermediate player in the conventional oil and gas sector. From her position within the Accounting Department, the company’s growth and her vision for the future was used to gather resources and sell a vision to upper management as well as her peers and subordinates within the corporation. With that said, it will be shown that selling the vision to upper management was only the first step in the direction towards a new vision and corresponding behaviours across her department.
Ms. Howland demonstrated her transformational leadership during the planning, execution, and implementation of a new accounting system. She was the project manager, tasked with ensuring the successful conversion from Ultimus, the company’s old system conversion program, to ADP, an automatic data processing program that takes advantage of electronic invoicing, allowing vendors to automatically and electronically load invoices into Crescent Point’s accounting system. The process of integrating a new accounting software requires that the leader adheres to a transformational approach, based on their personality and ability to make a difference through examp...
... middle of paper ...
...nting system, to a promotion style that adheres to different personality types and the retention of skilled employees. Ms. Howland has also demonstrated transformational leadership in the way she rewards subordinates, allowing them the autonomy and self-empowerment to select their own rewards. This has been shown to intellectually stimulate employees, which in turn will increase their motivation and productivity within the organization. By dedicating herself to the small details of the organization Ms. Howland has, through causal sequence, augmented the organizational culture of Crescent Point. The culture that she has fostered relies on organizational cohesion, which has allowed her department to detect market fluctuations early. As a result, Ms. Howland and her department have been able to remain highly productive and successful within a commodity driven industry.
This case study demonstrates a young woman leader, Toby Johnson, who used to serve in the military as a pilot and attended Harvard Business School, joined PepsiCo’s Leadership Development Program (LDP), and was working in the management team at the Williamsport plant. She determined to forge ahead, and led the plant to achieve the Level 3 CI and also won the Doolin Award, which the Williamsport plant had never achieved before. The problem that Johnson encounters currently is that if the plant should continue to forge ahead and achieve the ultimate Level 4 CI, which will cost huge amount of money and efforts with the risk of her sudden leave of plant.
The concept of transformational leadership relies on appropriate leadership approaches for mission success. AFDD 1-1 describes three leadership competencies: person, people/team, organization Effective leaders (tactical level) need to build face-to-face and interpersonal relationships that directly influence behavior and values. Effective leaders (operational level) need to build team dynamics for small groups and squadrons. Effective leaders (strategic level) need to build strategy and provide direction in a broad spectrum.
Leading Change was named the top management book of the year by Management General. There are three major sections in this book. The first section is ¡§the change of problem and its solution¡¨ ; which discusses why firms fail. The second one is ¡§the eight-stage process¡¨ that deals with methods of performing changes. Lastly, ¡§implications for the twenty-first century¡¨ is discussed as the conclusion. The eight stages of process are as followed: (1) Establishing a sense of urgency. (2) Creating the guiding coalition. (3) Developing a vision and a strategy. (4) Communicating the change of vision. (5) Empowering employees for broad-based action. (6) Generating short-term wins. (7) Consolidating gains and producing more changes. (8) Anchoring new approaches in the culture.
Managing transformational at National Computer Operations is an article discussing the dilemmas faced when a company is forced to implement changes within a two year timeframe in order to compete with other emerging computer technology companies. NCO’s Managing Director Gar Finvold, decided to review NCO’s market position and to look for improvement opportunities that change implementation enhancements would ensure that NCO would emerge and maintain their position as the leading computer support services firm.
In today’s ever changing world people must adapt to change. If an organization wants to be successful or remain successful they must embrace change. This book helps us identify why people succeed and or fail at large scale change. A lot of companies have a problem with integrating change, The Heart of Change, outlines ways a company can integrate change. The text book Ivanceich’s Organizational Behavior and Kotter and Cohen’s The Heart of Change outlines how change can be a good thing within an organization. The Heart of Change introduces its readers to eight steps the authors feel are important in introducing a large scale organizational change. Today’s organizations have to deal with leadership change, change in the economy,
In Leadership Theory, Application & Skill Development, transformational leadership is defined as “seeking to change the status quo by articulating to followers the problems in the current system and presenting a compelling vision of what a new organization could be” (Lussier & Achua, 2013, p.331). This theory, in combination with the exercise regimen, CrossFit, is the focus of the book Transformational Leadership and High-Intensity Interval Training by Carol R. Himelhoch, PhD. Himelhoch illustrates a correlation between a leader’s ability to tap into the transformational leadership style and their consistent participation in intense workout sessions. A transformational leadership style benefits from High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) via challenging the participant, which imparts a sense of achievement when they complete a demanding Workout of the Day (WOD). HIIT encourages the individual to push themselves and take risks, not only during the workout, but also in their leadership roles at work.
Change is when a person does not follow their everyday routine. They may want to try something different, or be forced to. Change can be for the good and the bad. Places can deal with change ranging from the weather, to the animals present, or the seasons changing. Also, objects can deal with change too. Objects like an iceberg can start to melt, or a forest fire can kill many trees in an area. As a human, we are the ones deciding on change. We are in a position to make big decisions and possibly even become a leader in order for change to happen. If one person starts to change, others will follow and hopefully, the change benefits all.
The core of transformational leadership is a strategic vision, a positive image or model for the future that energizes and unifies employees. Lizzie’s strategic vision is to provide a service to the customer that keeps them coming back time and time again. A successful strategic vision will have several noticeable features. These include, an idealized future with a higher purpose. This purpose helps fulfill the needs of the company’s stakeholders. Being able to satisfy the needs of the stakeholders through energized and unified employees allows a company to be very successful in the long run.
“Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail” is an article written by John P. Kotter in the Harvard Business Review, which outlines eight critical factors to help leaders successfully transform a business. Since leading requires the ability to influence other people to reach a goal, the leadership needs to take steps to cope with a new, more challenging global market environment. Kotter emphasizes the mistakes corporations make when implementing change and why those efforts create failure; therefore, it is essential that leaders learn to apply change effectively in order for it to be beneficial in the long-term (Kotter).
Transformational leadership is one of the most popular leadership styles. According to Kendrick (2011), “Transformational leadership involves four factors: 1. idealized influence, 2. inspirational motivation, 3. intellectual stimulation, and 4. individual consideration.” These four factors make transformational leadership have an impact on followers. The goal of transformational leadership is to cause a positive change in individuals, help motivate them, and develop a leader within each individual.
Kotter, J. P. (2007). ‘Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail’. Harvard Business Review, January: 96-103.
Certainly, an army would not be able to battle in the war without a commander who in charges of the whole strategy. Correspondingly, any organisations cannot function without leaders. Leader is the most substantial element of successful organizations. Becoming outstanding leaders, leadership skill is vital in order to drive the organizations forward. Several leadership principles are extensively used these days. Burns (1978) identified two types of leadership comprise of transactional and transformational leadership. Hence, leaders should be capable to indicate which theory should be applied in accordance with organization’s culture and objectives. This essay aims to evaluate the resemblances and the differences between transactional and transformational leadership as well as the feasibility to utilize a mixture of them by giving the definitions and examples followed by the supporting researches and studies.
A brief description of transformational leadership, according to James MacGregor Burns, is a new paradigm
From the first day of class in August 2016, I have been apart of theCrew and through my love of the organization, I have had the pleasure of being a team mentor and now the Director of Operations.My favorite part of theCrew is that you not only do you make a positive impact on your student organization but to the entire campus community. I love making faculty, staff, students and visitors days just a bit brighter. During fall break in 2016, I had the chance to go on Leadership Adventures which opened up my eyes to how transformative Leadership development can be. I left the retreat feeling proud and confident in my newfound abilities. Leadership Adventures was an amazing opportunity that has had perfect timing in my life. So in the fall of
Transformational leaders are needed to transform low performing organizations to acceptable to high performance. At other times, the leader is expected to move an organization from a crisis. In order to accomplish these tasks, the leader must overhaul the organization culture or subculture. This task is accomplished by nine ways of transforming others: 1. Raise others awareness. The leader makes others aware of the rewards and how to achieve them, i.e. pride in the job or financial incentives. 2. Help others look beyond self-interest. The transformational leader helps others to look at the “big picture” by describing an entire scenario, i.e. if we hire more employees to do x, we will have to make cuts in other areas. 3. Help people find self-fulfillment. The leader helps others not to focus on minor satisfactions, i.e. getting a job done before the deadline ...