Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Professional growth essay
Reflection on personal growth and professional development
Morality and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Professional growth essay
Forum 4
Name
Institution Forum 4
Response to Darryl Taliaferro
In the Darryl Taliaferro post, the foundational pivot of the argument posits that the idea of viable vision development to be adhered to by both the leaders and followers are concurrent alignment to the concept of morals, ethics, and leadership. It is stated that the leaders should not forfeit both the effective communication and development of viable visions to the stakeholders within the organization (Bolden et al., 2011). The reason being, should the scenario occur, then the leaders are likely to go astray from the present position of the company and its direction of future posterity consequently subjecting them to operating in a state of disillusioned being. In
…show more content…
Toxic leadership occur when the behaviours of the leaders are irrational in nature. Ion of toxic leadership is in relation to both the individuals’ physical and psychological characteristics. The effects of toxic leadership is that its demonstration is confined within dysfunctional characteristics whose manifestations erupt in destructive, abnormal, and antisocial behaviours. The learning about toxic leadership is of importance in two major ways. First, it promotes the revelation of the negative roles of toxic leadership in organizations and creates emphasis on the need of establishing ethics. Secondly, it provides positive impact on the leadership philosophy of an individual making one much aware of the ethical performance significance and the toxic leadership’s harmful effects. However, the idea that remains fundamental in both the workplaces and everyday life is the spirituality principle since it upholds moral behaviours (McCuddy & Pirie, 2007). Spirituality invokes the stewardship attitude of leaders, promotes the leaders’ effectiveness level, and enhances interactions of people from diverse spiritual culture by facilitating professional and personal growth (Lewis & Geroy,
1. Merriam-Webster dictionary defines leadership as the office or position of a leader; capacity to lead; the act or an instance of leading, and it defines a leader as a person who has commanding authority or influence; a first or principal performer of a group. In the 1965 movie “In Harm’s Way”, Rear Admiral Torrey displayed the traits of a leader throughout the movie. He took care of his SAILORS, when the widower XO onboard his command was having drinking problems because of the manner and circumstances in which his wife died, RADM Torrey took the time to talk to him and gave him advice on doing the right thing, to quit drinking, let go of the past, and move on with his life. Instead of punishing him, RAMD Torrey tried to help him. During battle, RAMD Torrey was a leader by letting his friend CDR Powell know that it was fine to be afraid, that battles are fought by scared men who find the courage and commitment to fight and carryout the mission. RAMD Torrey surrounded himself with SAILORS he could trust, men who would carry out plans in the face of danger and adversity. I was fond of the scene where the Command Duty Officer onboard the cruiser did not slow down to wait for the ship’s CO to catch-up and board, he made a decision to continue at full speed, leaving the harbor during the December 7, 1941, Japanese attack, and thus saving the ship.
Effective leadership is founded by a leader’s dedication to life-long development. The measure of leadership is not the quality of the head, but the tone of the body. Leadership is a concept of owing debt to the institution and it is about thinking of institutional heirs and stewardship. The final objective of Grace-full leadership leads to enhancing the life and effectiveness of the people and the organization for the betterment of the society. A Grace-full leader is servant leader, embracing humility, people’s heart and body and following Christ’s lead in making the world’s today, a better than
Leadership is a quality which cannot be acquired by any person from the other but it can be acquired by self-determination of a person. Leadership can best be called the personality of the very highest ability-whether in ruling, thinking, imagining, innovation, warring, or religious influencing. Leadership is practiced not so much in words a it is in attitude and in actions. Their actions leave a long lasting memory in the line of history and lead up to may events that occur today. To be a leader one will need many qualities. Leaders have a purpose and strategies to accomplish that purpose. They are driven and motivated. In the end they should be able to attain good results. These innate talents help to make up a leader that will succeed and be efficient in carrying out tasks. But, the purpose of this paper is determine what truly makes a leader successful. A successful leader should be considered more on their impact rather than their accomplishments of their organizations alone for they are not sufficient in determining the key to their success .
The spiritual leadership theory was developed during an evolution and progression of modern leadership theories. Research suggests that the spiritual leadership theory is the solution for addressing work overload and increased stress due to globalization, culturally diverse environments, robust technology, and competitive markets (Fry & Cohen, 2009). The theory’s purpose is to motivate others through values, attitudes, and behaviors; incorporating basic human needs: vision, hope, faith, love, work spirituality, and spiritual well-being (Fry & Cohen, 2009). As a result, several changes occurred such as, team empowerment, increased levels of organizational dedication, and increased organizational productivity and performance. The purpose of this
According to explanations provided by DuBrin (2012), narcissistic leadership is understood to be a form of leadership provided by individuals who are narcissistic. In the society, narcissistic individuals are found to be those that are more concerned about themselves and their actions are only those that improve their own self even at the expense of others. When it comes to leadership, which is a position that leads or takes charge of a group of people, Campbell & Miller (2011) says it is like a form of an opportunity given to improve the leader’s social status. Thus, narcissistic leadership is a form of leadership that does not build others and hence it is not found to be effective enough. Good introductory paragraph helps follow the discussion
There are many types of leadership styles and ways in which leaders can influence the people around them and they all have their strengths and opportunities, however it is the behaviors that we encourage in our followers that will ultimately determine their success or failure. By articulating a vision to our team that helps them understand how their role in Social Media, and how these actions contribute to the overall success of the organization. Yuki (2012) stated, “The essences of leadership in organizations is influencing and facilitating individual and collective efforts to accomplish shared objectives. Leaders can improve the performance of a team or organization by influencing the processes that determine performance” (p. 66). We will look at specific real life experience in the creation of a web based Customer/Technical Support Team; analyze the leadership behaviors that were used to implement the goals, the metrics used to measure their progress, and make recommendations as to how those behaviors could have been improved. We will look at some of the effects of the negative behavior and how it affected the team. What could have been done to improve the overall effectiveness of the team and what, if any affect that may have had on the team or organization as a whole.
The leadership is a privilege and it is such a privilege and an honor which will carry the tremendous responsibility which will inspire others to direct them to accomplish goals and vision of the organization. Leadership is about influencing the people, by producing direction, purpose and motivating in order to accomplish the mission, vision and improving the organization. The leadership philosophy is evolved based on the experiences, both positive and negative, in most of the initiatives and activities that we undertake. It is also one among the collaboration and teamwork within which the team members can utilize each other’s strengths to counter the weaknesses of the individuals. By observing, introspecting and experimenting we can developed a leadership paradigm which is inclusive, collaborative and proactive. We can develop the ability to recognize which will approach in order to reach the productive conclusion. The great leaders know their limitations and are capable at utilize their strengths and also the strengths of others to compensate.
Emotions of a leader are so important in this aspect of leadership. It is through emotions that the leader will be categorized as ‘toxic’ or ‘not toxic.’ It is with no doubt that true leaders will appeal to emotions and as the same time know how to cope with their own emotions and how to perceive or control the emotions of a group. The major fundamental task of a leader is to inspire positive feelings in those he leads. In whichever situation followers always turn their attention to leaders, they expect his reaction towards that particular situation which will act as emotional guideline. The way a leader responds to a situation will give the followers a way of interpreting that event which in turn will make them react emotionally. If a leaders panics, gets annoyed or angry, these emotions will spread to the followers. On the contrary if he shows confidence and optimism to the same situation, his emotions will also be “infectious” (Maxwell, 2002).
With all this being said what is leadership, what is toxic leadership in what effect can it have on their subordinate? Toxic leadership mishandles their power and position often, in will leave the organization and the soldier worse than when they found it. The U.S Army describe toxic leader as a combination of self-centered attitudes, motivations, and behaviors that have adverse effects on subordinates, the organization, and mission performance. So in layman term toxic leaders are any individuals who
Throughout my life, my experiences and role models have shaped my understanding of leadership. I believe leadership is responsibly guiding and motivating others to use both my strengths and their own to obtain success. My personal leadership philosophy is guided by my core values of my family, relationships, loyalty, harmony, and responsibility. My ever-changing definition of philosophy helps my leadership and decision making routinely. New experience’s and external forces effect my translation of leadership daily which, in turn, helps shape me into a successful leader.
Organizations have leaders who are effective and ineffective. Many of us want to be leaders but, do we have what it takes to be effective or are we going to be ineffective. Leaders are people who build their organization and employees up. Ineffective leaders are those who only care about getting a check. This paper will discuss effective and ineffective leaders. The effective and ineffective leaders I have had the pleasure to work with.
There are many examples of poor leadership behavior in today’s workplace. Inadequate leadership can be detrimental not only to a team within an organization, but also to the entire organization itself. I believe it is vital for upper management to ensure that their leaders are properly trained and aware of how to handle certain situations and employees. When a leader’s weaknesses are overlooked, large problems occur.
Toxic leadership is usually the right way to describe the leaders who head a particular organization who stresses everyone that works under him/her. However, this should not be confused with tough leaders. There are characteristics of a toxic leader which you must recognize before you decide to work under such poisonous cloud. These leaders may or may not recognize that they are behaving "toxic" themselves. But people who work under them inevitably will begin to use words like “destroy - either someone’s career or the company, bully, threaten, yell, back stab, belittle, and working under him/her is hell.”
In leadership, the words and actions of leaders are in the spotlight of followers, moral failures often precede the loss of integrity; however, integrity can also be lost by failing to do the simple things such as following through on a promise or dodging a commitment (Stewart, 2003). Jesus requires integrity in leadership even in small matters; thus, when it comes to integrity, small matters can also be huge ones in Christian leadership (Stewart, 2003). Outside the confines of Christian leadership, one challenge to secular leadership is the ego of the leader; hence, the ego of a business executive can be a very destructive force and can prevent a good company from becoming a great company (Kleinman, 2004). Businesses that are termed successful have leaders with ambition but no ego; therefore, those leaders with ambition but no ego, ultimately place the business or institution above themselves (Kleinman, 2004). Ego comes at a great cost to leadership because of pride, in the end, pride leads to blindness in decision making and unavoidable future regret. My own view on the biggest challenge to leadership is developing management effectiveness. Management is frequently defined in terms of being a systematic process that controls people and resources; thus, with an overlap between leadership and management, many leaders greatly need
Leader should have the shared responsibility and collaborative quality. For example, instead of making the strategy alone, he will gather the idea of all brilliant workers to increase the productivity of the organisation.