Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of 9/11 on America
Impact of 9/11 attacks
The effects of 9/11 on the United States
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of 9/11 on America
and it quite possibly be a reality. Therefore the idea of torture as being illegal is redirected with loopholes and terms defined.
After 9-11 George Bush, Dick Cheney, and the CIA used loopholes to torture the suspects after the attack. Al Qaeda terrorists were not classified under prisoners of war and there was a genuine concern of other attacks to follow (Yoo 1). Under these interpretations and bending of the laws Bush was legal and justified in the actions taken. The Bush administration picked waterboarding as their main force when torturing the masterminds behind the attacks. Waterboarding was picked because they had been training special force teams and tens of thousands of other soldiers before the attacks, and it was stated that they
…show more content…
America prides itself in treated all individuals humanely and fairly, and even one person under force suffering is against what America stands for. America should never justify torture based on our beliefs we were built on. Bruce Anderson says, “A man can retain his human dignity in front of a firing squad or on the scaffold: not in a torture chamber. Torturers set out to break their victim: to take human being and reduce him to a whimpering wreck” (Anderson 1). America does not believe in breaking someone down, but rather build them up. When an American messes up, in jail we continue to build them up. We help them get a college degree, try to work some of their unwanted qualities out, and give them the opportunities to better themselves. America is supposed to be the leader and teach the world that torture is not the answer. That is why nearly a quarter of American people believe torture should never be used of justified (ProQuest 2). Americans still hold the core values that this beautiful country was built …show more content…
Torture can prevent the attacks resulting in terror or can go and prove no one, no one can infringe the right of Americans in the result of another attack, and therefore torture is justifiable. The similarities between ISIS and Al Qaeda is scary and torture needs to be in the back pocket of all officials to prevent similar disasters. The clock stopped ticking on 9-11, and anyone on the street can tell oneself where they were the minute they heard. The use of torture could save the lives of thousands, send the message that America is in charge, and can become more commonly accepted in the eyes of disaster. A ticking bomb could be going off at any time, it could destroy a spouse, a son, a daughter, a friend, a neighbor, or maybe the threat is to oneself, torture could get the information to destroy the bomb before it destroys one’s life. Torture is justifiable.
After the September the 11th attacks on the world trade center, countries around the globe thought it was necessary to take extra precautions when dealing with terrorists. The United States hence forth brought terrorist that were being help to Guantanamo bay. Guantanamo bay hold terrorist that are responsible for the September 11th attacks. These terrorist are kept at Guantanamo in order to prevent any further attacks from happening with in the United States. The prisoners that are help there are subdued to a form of interrogation known as water boarding. The process consists of a cloth being placed over the detainees face and the interrogator proceeds to pour water over the detainees face. This gives the feeling that you are drowning, but really you re panicking because you think you are drowning. Many people
Because of the 9/11 terrorist, the U.S. have been able to limit the outcomes they produce by using physical and mental torture against their emotional torture they used on the Citizens. Its not the U.S. that started this battle over the use of torture, america had to protect itself from further hurt. “The suffering caused by the terrorists is the real torture (Jean-Marie Le Pen).” people argue that torture it is an inhumane act to deliberately beat a victim physically and mentally. The problem is that there are no other possible solutions to obtain information that are as effective as torture on such events other than force it out of them by using torture as their primary weapon (The Legal Prohibition). If the U.S. wants to pursue the safety of americans they have to take actions, As long as there are no bombs going off around the world, the U.S. will continue to use torture . Terrorism has become a much greater threat than before. regardless if the beating are too extreme, it is still the duty of the state to protect its citizens (Torture Is Just Means). Even if the interoges are suffering from severe torture, the U.S. is able t...
From a moral standpoint, torture is wrong and unacceptable. Many religious people are against this act of violence because they see it as a violation of the dignity of a human being. Humans have the right to not have intentional harm upon themselves from others. The ban on torture furthermore supports this certain right. Not only does torture violate people’s rights, but they also violate the demands of justice. In the past, many of our nation’s people have been tortured and we have had a problem with it; but when it’s not you the one that is being tortured, it seems to be fine. Have you heard of the golden rule, “Treat others only as you consent to being treated in the same situation? (7)” This applies very well to this problem.
Many people think that solitary confinement is torture and inhumane, but is it necessary? Solitary confinement is a form of punishment, to help guards keep prisoners in line and under control. Prisoners are kept in a small cell without a window for several days depending on their behavior. They are isolated by themselves for the majority of the day, and have no interaction with other people. Solitary confinement, also known as the shoe, has been around for several . It has been banned in other countries around the world, and many people are trying to do the same here in the United States. Some will argue that solitary confinement causes more problems than what it helps. It is not needed in the majority of cases and causes problems,
One of the groups argued that torture is sometimes okay while the other group argued that under no circumstances is torture allowed. In my opinion, the group that is against torture won the debate because they had more good points than the other group did. The group that was against torture argued that torture affects innocent people and ruins people’s lives. The group that is says sometimes torture is okay said that torture is helpful when getting information from suspected terrorists. There is also always a reason for doing it. The government gets background information about these suspects before even thinking about using “enhanced interrogation” techniques on them. It helps them find about key information because there is no other way to get information from them. The no torture group fights back saying that you don’t want to stoop down to their level and that you do not necessarily know if they are terrorists. If you keep getting the wrong people, you will just keep going in circles. You could even accidently kill the person while waterboarding them and there is no justification for killing someone you don’t know. The torture that is okay with torture clarified that torture is only okay under certain circumstances because there is no other way to get information from them. If you just kept them in a prison, they would wait their whole life before giving up any information. Then, the no torture group
It seems with Trump’s presidency comes torture. The debate on whether the U.S. should return to torture methods in foreign interrogations has been buzzing since Gina Haspel was nominated for the CIA and spoke out against torturing the detained foreigners. She stands for empathetic tactics to elicit information, Whereas Trump feels that torture would be an efficient alternative. Tortue in itself is unethical and currently illegal in the U.S., the methods can be temporarily painful or even life-threatening and should only be used as a last resort in extremely
There is no situation in which torture is permissible. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and other Declarations by the United Nations General Assembly express the shared moral values of numerous countries of the world. It is concluded that “torture admits no necessity by which it can be justified”. Article 5 of the UDHR states that “no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” Additionally, Article 2.2 of the Torture Convention supports the impermissibility of the ‘ticking time bomb’ scenario, stating that there can be no exceptions to the ban on torture. Therefore, it is more than clear that any use of torture in the ‘ticking time bomb’ scenario is a violation under international law. My view of how to handle the circumstance supports this notion that neither the ‘ticking time bomb’ situation nor any oth...
Eduardo Galeano once said, “The purpose of torture is not getting information. It’s spreading fear” (BrainyQuote). Torture is used when individuals are forced to answer questions through various kinds of abuse. Torture happens due to the government and the belief that torture is a benefit because it saves innocent lives. Torture is wrong and should not be legalized as a means of interrogating terrorists because it causes physical and psychological damage and it produces false information.
The United States stood by its policy of opposing torture for a long time and guaranteed they would never torture prisoners until the attacks on September 11, 2001 occurred. In the aftermath of these attacks secret legal practices were formed and gave U.S. officials the power to torture suspected terrorists. After this the U.S. began psychologically and physically torturing detainees following the attacks. The U.S. took a stance that you need to get your hands dirty in order to receive something good. For example the Bush Administration vowed to “take the gloves off” in conflict with detainees(Quote found:
After the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the fear of another catastrophic event in the United States became a greater concern for the American public. To subdue the growing fear amongst the public, political officials across America were compelled to address new debates on the nation’s tactics to prevent another atrocity. Possibly the most heated, and still argued debate, is that of the appropriateness of the employment of torture to acquire necessary intelligence; and as in most debates in our nation, our political representatives are bitterly divided concerning the issue. While many claim that the use of torture in any case is morally wrong, more radical advocates for the use of torture believe that it is “morally mandatory”. This ethical dilemma, however, must come to a conclusion if the nation is to improve its moral and diplomatic relations.
Although this is a view seen by many people there is also those like me that believe it's a necessary evil, necessary in ways that can save countless lives in return for a little inhumanity shown against those that are showing no humanity themselves to others. According to Author of “The Ethics of Killing”,Jeff McMahan “Torture can be morally justifiable, and even obligatory, when it is wholly defensive – for example, when torturing a wrongdoer would prevent him from seriously harming innocent people”. Author Jeff McMahan agrees with those that believe torture is acceptable in a few situations. Commentator Charles Krauthammer from MLive media group argues the same that there are times when torture is the only choice. “Torture is an impermissible evil. Except under two circumstances. The first is the ticking time bomb. An innocent's life is at stake. The bad guy you have captured possesses information that could save this life. He refuses to divulge. In such a case, the choice is easy...The second exception to the no-torture rule is the extraction of information from a high-value enemy in possession of high-value information likely to save lives”. Another formidable lawyer and commentator, Sydney Kentridge, came up with a more sinister plot. “The nuclear device is ticking, we have a member of the terrorist group but we have also found his wife and children, may god forbid this situation ever arise but we would not only have the right to torture but we would have the duty to do
Torture legalization has been a controversial debate among the government officials following the incidents of 9/11. America launched a war on terrorism against Al-Qaida and other terrorist extremists in response to many different threats and attacks from those terrorist organizations. Many suspects were caught by American intelligence and many were incarcerated. However, the problem became the way US would deal with those prisoners to get the information needed to win the war. US started secretly using harsh methods to force the prisoners to talk. The United Nations Convention Against Torture (UNCAT) act signed by the US after the WWII explains torture as a dehumanizing method that diverge from the respect of human rights (Chazelle). The US is believed to be among countries that put human rights first. Any attempt to legalize torture would not justify its use because torture would still be a dehumanizing act. Those who propose torture legalization do not suggest torture to be among the primary methods of interrogation,
In the UN Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which was ratified by the United States, torture is specifically outlawed. It clearly states in article four, paragraph one that “all acts of torture are offenses under criminal law” (2). This law is not optional, although the United States military and government have been treating it as such. Mitch Frank agrees. He says that “most experts agree that the convention against torture makes it pretty clear that you can’t put prisoners through any physical or mental stress in interrogation. Most people would agree that waterboarding constitutes as physical and mental stress. Another law, the Geneva Convention, again forbids torture. The Geneva Conventions explicitly prohibit “’cruel treatment and torture’” and “’outrages upon personal dignity’” (Head 32). Yet we, as Americans, have turned a blind eye to these obvious crimes against humanity. The laws against torture must be
As Eduardo Galeano says, ¨The purpose of torture is not getting information. It's spreading fear.¨ This quote shows that Torture happens on a daily basis causing many people to fear extremist groups because of their actions on innocent people. In Iraq and Syria extremists groups decide to kill and torture beings as a sign of power to enemies. No one is safe in the states of Iraq and Syria because a extremist group could come to your community and kidnap people to use them to torture them or even as sex slaves. The use of torture by extremists in Iraq and Syria is a frightening human rights issue. One human rights issue torture violates is holding someone against their will when they do not wanna be in that situation.
These people are crushed, collapsed, cauterized, contused, and overall, they are tortured. Torture is purposely harming another person for multiple reasons and it should never be used in any situation. Even though torture dates back to medieval times, it is not acceptable even if used as punishment. Whether to gain information, discover a disaster plan, stop future attacks, or anything else, using excess force and hurting another human being is awful. The effects on the victims and culprits of torture are too substantially great to ignore or to be outweighed by the ‘benefits’ of this type of aggression. Countless people have been murdered and many survivors still live with scars, horrid memories, mood disorders, bipolar tendencies, and many other health effects.