Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of guantanamo bay essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Guantanamo Bay is located at the southeastern tip of Cuba; it is a United States owned territory dating back to the Spanish American war. The territory contains a high security military detention center and a functional base. The detention center houses high priority Al Qaeda operatives and conspirators to the September 11th attacks on the world trade center. Guantanamo bay is an important asset to keeping the United States safe. In recent years the operation of the base has been slowed down due to the efforts of president Obama. He vowed to shut the base down and move the high risk targets to a high security prison in the United States main land. Without Guantanamo bay the United States wouldn’t be able to contain high risk detainees that the base currently holds. Guantanamo bay should stay open. The method of interrogation, water boarding may be controversial but I think it is necessary in order to extract vital information from Al Qaeda operatives and other terrorists groups. After the September the 11th attacks on the world trade center, countries around the globe thought it was necessary to take extra precautions when dealing with terrorists. The United States hence forth brought terrorist that were being help to Guantanamo bay. Guantanamo bay hold terrorist that are responsible for the September 11th attacks. These terrorist are kept at Guantanamo in order to prevent any further attacks from happening with in the United States. The prisoners that are help there are subdued to a form of interrogation known as water boarding. The process consists of a cloth being placed over the detainees face and the interrogator proceeds to pour water over the detainees face. This gives the feeling that you are drowning, but really you re panicking because you think you are drowning. Many people
For instance in the witch trials the accused were brought to court and unfairly tried in court. This is different from the situation in Guantanamo Bay. Suspected terrorist are placed in jail instantly, and may never have the chance to be tried. Another way they are different is that it was publicly announced when someone went to jail for being a witch while in Guantanamo Bay people are taken from around the world and no one knows where they go and they are just missing and end up in Guantanamo Bay. A person who goes to Guantanamo has no contact with the outside world and their family may never know what happened to their loved ones. Much has changed since the salem witch trials though. In Guantanamo Bay people are not told to confess or be killed. They are in jail and told to give up information or they could be tortured and not killed. During the witch trials, if they confessed to being a witch or accused others, they were put in jail or even released. If they said they were not guilty they were hung, without
Guantanamo Bay has been in control by America since the Spanish American war.Guantanamo bay was used as a coaling station for american navy ships.According to” A Brief History of Gitmo” by Alyssa Fetini. . “The 45-square-mile site was originally used as a coaling station for U.S. Navy ships, under a lease drawn up in 1903”. This is very important because this shows how Guantanamo bay was used as something positive and beneficial to America.Guantanamo bay was then a “haven” for Haitian refugees. According to the same article ” A Brief History of Gitmo” by Alyssa Fetini.in the early 1990s “when it became a vital haven for Haitian refugees fleeing the violent coup that ravaged their country.”This is also another example on how Guantanamo bay was used in a positive and helpful way.Guantanamo bay has been through many changes and uses and has a lot of history behind it.
The author Allen S. Keller, M.D., is the director of the Bellevue Hospital Center and belongs to the member’s advisory council on human rights. (p.558) He is well known for his advocacy on the various use of torture tactics used on Iraqi prisoners and other refuges. During a Congressional meeting Mr. Keller stated "To think that abusive methods, including the enhanced interrogation techniques [in which Keller included waterboarding], are harmless psychological ploys is contradictory to well established medical knowledge and clinical experience." (“CNN”, 2007)
On September 11, 2001, this country was under attack and thousands of Americans died at the hands of terrorists. This action caused the U.S. Military to invade Iraq because of the idea that this country was involved in harboring terrorist and were believed to have weapons of mass destruction. This was an executive order that came down from our government, for us to go in and attack Iraq while searching for those who were responsible for the death of American lives. This war brought in many prisoners whom were part of the terrorist group Al-Qaeda, whom the military took into custody many of its lower level members to get tips in capturing higher level members. During the detainees stay at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib, many of these prisoners
Ex-president George W. Bush asserts, “Abu Zubaydah also provided information that helped stop a terrorist attack being planned for inside the United States -- an attack about which we had no previous information.” Abu Zubaydah was a high-ranking Al Qaeda official who was water boarded (Luban, 1). Water boarding is a form torture that simulates drowning. Through this form of torture, the US was able to receive vital information that led to the prevention of a bomber decimating a bridge. Moreover, the CIA was able to extract this information and incarcerate the criminal. Though many lives were potentially saved, Bush was criticized for allowing the action of torture. He se...
I think a big impact on the life of Jews would be their belief in God
Mass incarceration has put a large eye-sore of a target on the United States’ back. It is hurting our economy and putting us into more debt. It has considerable social consequences on children and ex-felons. Many of these incarcerations can be due to the “War on Drugs”. We should contract the use of incarceration.
Prisons have been around for decades. Keeping housed, those of our society who have been convicted
After 9-11 George Bush, Dick Cheney, and the CIA used loopholes to torture the suspects after the attack. Al Qaeda terrorists were not classified under prisoners of war and there was a genuine concern of other attacks to follow (Yoo 1). Under these interpretations and bending of the laws Bush was legal and justified in the actions taken. The Bush administration picked waterboarding as their main force when torturing the masterminds behind the attacks. Waterboarding was picked because they had been training special force teams and tens of thousands of other soldiers before the attacks, and it was stated that they
One of the groups argued that torture is sometimes okay while the other group argued that under no circumstances is torture allowed. In my opinion, the group that is against torture won the debate because they had more good points than the other group did. The group that was against torture argued that torture affects innocent people and ruins people’s lives. The group that is says sometimes torture is okay said that torture is helpful when getting information from suspected terrorists. There is also always a reason for doing it. The government gets background information about these suspects before even thinking about using “enhanced interrogation” techniques on them. It helps them find about key information because there is no other way to get information from them. The no torture group fights back saying that you don’t want to stoop down to their level and that you do not necessarily know if they are terrorists. If you keep getting the wrong people, you will just keep going in circles. You could even accidently kill the person while waterboarding them and there is no justification for killing someone you don’t know. The torture that is okay with torture clarified that torture is only okay under certain circumstances because there is no other way to get information from them. If you just kept them in a prison, they would wait their whole life before giving up any information. Then, the no torture group
Imagine you have just been brought into a small, gray room. In the middle of it, you see a chair; Almost like a dentist chair. The interrogator straps you in it so you can’t move. You feel hopeless as your arms and legs are being strapped to the table. They recline you backwards so your feet are above your head. Then, they take a wet towel and slap it over your head. Your breath starts to get louder, louder, and louder until it feels like you can’t breath. Then, the water comes. Down your mouth, nose, and into your lungs. You are coughing and trying to ask for mercy but you can’t say anything. The water keeps coming while the interrogator screams at you. You feel helpless and you feel the life sucking out of you. Waterboarding should not continue
How far can obedience to authority be blamed for atrocities that humans commit? How far should the blame go, for instances like the Abu Ghraib torture and abuse of prisoners? Should the blame go to the prison guards, should the blame go to those in higher power involved with Abu Ghraib, or should the blame go all the way up to President George W. Bush, the one who started the war? The answer is simple; blaming just one of them would turn out to be a cheap scapegoat. What happened in the Abu Ghraib prison can not be put into any category and the blame can not be put onto one person. The Abu Ghraib abuse and torture controversy is not an example of obedience to authority nor is it an example of the corruption of those in authority, Abu Ghraib is an example of people committing atrocities because
...States, Britain, and Israel Detain and Incapitate Terrorist Suspects.” The Journal of the Naval Post Graduate School Center for HOmeland Defense, and Security. Vol IV No. 3. Oct 2008. Web. 1 April 2014.
The torture of captured suspects is contrary to the values of the American legal system because generally captured suspects are entitled to due process, according to Amendment V of the United States Constitution: “no person shall be . . . deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” In addition to amendment V of the United States Constitution, Article I, section 9, clause 1 of the United States Constitution states “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it”. So in theory the U.S can deny Guantanamo Bay detainees their rights to habeas corpus despite holding them in a U.S based facility, since detainees aren’t U.S citizens.