Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of devolution in scotland
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of devolution in scotland
Tony Blair is a British Labour Party leader who served as United Kingdom’s prime minister from 1997 to 2007. During his first term, Blair seemed uninterested in foreign affairs for the most part, focusing mainly on domestic issues. He described his philosophy of government as the “Third Way”, a policy most often described as an endeavor to discover a form of progressive politics which is different than both leftist and rightist conservatism. He claimed that his policies were designed to help citizens cope with globalization and to enable social democracy to respond to worldwide market economy challenges. Just like one of his predecessors, Margaret Thatcher, he distrusted the civil service, and enforced policies which meant that all policy announcements would have to be cleared with 10 Downing Street before being made public. He also organized referenda that created devolved assemblies in Wales and Scotland, and developed a joint committee to coordinate policies with the Liberal Democrats (Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d.). Along with the devolution in Scotland and Wales, Blair’s tenure also saw progress in the Northern Ireland peace …show more content…
However, his domestic policies are most often viewed as incoherent and short-termed, as it is believed that he failed to deliver more concrete solutions for other important issues that were starting to rise throughout the country, such as rising crime and drug use. Furthermore, while the economy growth was uninterrupted, low productivity and growing personal and state debts plagued the economy. Blair was also criticized for his decision to allow millions of low-skilled migrant workers into the country in the wake of the country losing a large part of its manufacturing base (Encyclopedia Britannica,
The conservative party has been in existence since the 1670s and was first called the ‘Tories’, a term used by the Scottish and Irish to describe a robber. This party is a right- wing party which believed in conserving the tradition and the king, as the name entails. David Cameron, the current party leader became the leader in 2005. He is also the present prime minister of Great Britain and he has made a lot of changes since he became the leader of the party. In this essay, I will talk about the history of the party, looking into detail at their gradual changes or transition in ideology and the various changes that David Cameron has made to the party’s image and beliefs.
Heath’s premiership during the years of 1970 to 1974 presents a period of affluence and appeasement alongside a lack of control indicates that Heath’s reign largely was a failure in maintaining stability. Despite the achievements that Heath implemented like Brittain finally getting into the EEC, the Oil Crisis, U-turn policies and the rest of the economic failures overshadow the policies that provided stability and modernisation establishing that Heath, according to Row ‘was good at policies not politics.’
This essay will address whether New Labour contained policies with which it wished to pursue, or was solely developed in order to win elections. It is important to realise whether a political party that held office for approximately 13 years only possessed the goal of winning elections, or promoted policies which it wished to pursue. If a party that held no substance was governing for 13 years, it would be unfair to the people. New Labour was designed to win elections, but still contained policies which it wished to pursue. To adequately defend this thesis, one must look at the re-branding steps taken by New Labour and the new policies the party was going to pursue. Through analysis, it will be shown that New Labour promoted policies in regards
When horrific crimes occur in large cities, many of them can be chalked up to gang violence or to the larger population of that specific city. But when horrific crimes happen in small cities like Lincoln, Nebraska, people begin to ask questions like who did this and why. In 1958, a nineteen year old man named Charles Starkweather put the entire state of Nebraska and possibly the entire nation in a state of terror. With his murder spree taking only three days, Starkweather had collected a body count of ten bodies, including two teenagers and a young child. Understanding Starkweather’s past and state of mind begins to answer the second question of why.
of the Labour Party and the growth of the TUC and the emergence of the
The conservative approach to state intervention post 1979 has been on the whole to go for the minimum as is illustrated in their economic policy and this was included in their critique of government economic policy at that time. On the whole the government felt that levels of state intervention were far too high in regards to the economy which led to various negative consequences such as making industry uncompetitive and laid back since the government would bail them out at the first sign of smoke as Labour always did. They also felt it destroyed the incentives for individual entrepreneurship leading people into not achieving their full potential as it was not worth there while, this led to lack of money within the economy as well as top businessmen leaving for pastures new. On the whole Thatcher was a strong advocate of believing regulation by the state should be minimised as it had a large amount of control over things like wages, prices, profits and production systems which was thought to stifle business expansion. Most regulation was in nationalised industries and the way this problem was solved was through privatisation which was a major step towards reducing state intervention in the economy. This was passing major sections of the economy that were state run onto the private sector, although it did contain advantages such as managers pursuing profits it was primarily the disengagement of the state that was at the heart of “Thatcherism”, and this policy was indeed rather Thatcheresque. Classical economics believed state interference was negative and Thatcher considered herself as a modern heir to this classical view. Of course privatisation was a trend that continued beyond the 1980’s and with New Labour who converted to it b...
Tony Blair's Approach to Power Since Labour came into power in 1997 Tony Blair has been criticised by some for being the 'son of Thatcher'. Many say that labour is now following the values and policies similar to that of a Tory government and in particular a Tory government lead by Margaret Thatcher. Before the time of Tony Blair and New Labour, the left wing party stood firm on one value and that was socialism. More on Labours old Values and policies The conservatives on the other hand have very different policies or not so different as some may argue. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher lead the conservative government from 1979-1990 and she made some very radical changes that have stuck.
Leadership, the ability to influence a group toward achievement of a vision or set of goals (Kursh, Lant, Majeske, Olver, Plant 232), embodies the theme of the Aston – Blair Case, and it reinforces the importance of good leadership involving teams compiled to achieve specific results. Leadership is an important element in business, and good leadership fosters productive relationships; establishes clear lines of effort, roles, and communication; and inspires individuals to perform despite conflict or personal biases. Bacon’s inexperience and limited management background displays an inability to communicate effectively, and effective communication is an essential element of leadership and group work of this type. As the group chairman, Bacon’s
In 1997, Tony Blair of the labour party won the United Kingdom’s general election on the ideology, goals and a party manifesto of a ‘new labour’, a revision, an update and a reform of the old labour party, bringing new radical politics to the 20th century - although some believe that labour only won the election due to the British publics increasing hate for Thatcher and the conservatives. The term new labour was a reflection on how the labour party was trying to reform itself and depart from the ideas of ‘old labour’ that had failed to win an election since 1974 and take on new ideas and politics that seemed radical, new and progressive and that would regain trust from the British voters. ‘New labour, new for Britain’ was the slogan that first appeared on the party’s manifesto in 1996 and soon became the party’s main slogan for the campaign of the 1997 elections. But how exactly was new labour new? New labour was trying to become more progressive with its politics that reformed all of the key policy domains that the government were interested in. By attempting to reform the party’s manifesto as well as clause IV, new labour attempted to become a new party that could progress British politics rather than rely on traditional politics of old labour. New labour wanted to modernise the party’s by perusing their traditional goals which include job support, economic growth, investments in public services, welfare and redistribution but they also wanted new progressive politics that catered to the minority groups in terms of social justice, for example civil partnerships (King,2002). However, some argue that new labour was not particularly ‘new’ and instead that Blair’s government had betrayed the traditions of the labour party and inst...
Cooper, Barry, Allan Kornberg and William Mishler. The Resurgence of Conservatism in Anglo-American Democracies. Durham: Duke University Press, 1988. Print.
George, S. and Bache, I. 2001.Politics In the European Union. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bills are defined as a draft of a proposed law presented to parliament for discussion. Governor Grey Abbott has vetoed 42 bills so far. He uses the original documents and his conservatism to make his desions . He argues that if the bills will to pass than the state government will grow stronger. The smaller bills that he vetoes, he looks at it and sees if it favors one part of a state more than the other which could be unfair and unethical for the government if it favored one part of a state than another. If he is dealing with criminal and election bills he favors the present state system than making any changes. The large amount of bills vetoed by Grey Abbott has been the largest vetoed bills since Rick Perry who vetoed 56 bills in the year
7th edition. London: Pearson Longman, ed. Garner, R., Ferdinand, P. and Lawson, S. (2009) Introduction to Politics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Anthony Giddens, born in 1938 in London, held positions at The University of Leicester, Cambridge University and the London School of Economics as well as several visiting positions at universities in the United States. Giddens’ early academic work focused on re-conceptualizing classical theory, particularly Functionalism and Structuralism. Similar to Foucault, he took interest in politics later in life. Giddens is known for supporting third way politics, which is a shift from traditional left and right political policies and practices (Calhoun et al 2007: 219). He cofounded Polity Press, served as Director of the London School of Economics and acts as a political advisor in England (Ritzer 2010: 132).
Power and politics in organizations is an inter-related topic that has been studied by many researchers previously. It is an interesting but sensitive topic to discuss in public because managers and the organizations which they are working for do not consider this topic as either ‘valuable corporate or personal publicity’, according to Buchanan and Badham (1999, p.615).