Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities between liberalism and conservatism ideologies
Similarities between liberalism and conservatism ideologies
Similarities between liberalism and conservatism ideologies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Tony Blair's Approach to Power
Since Labour came into power in 1997 Tony Blair has been criticised by
some for being the 'son of Thatcher'. Many say that labour is now
following the values and policies similar to that of a Tory government
and in particular a Tory government lead by Margaret Thatcher.
Before the time of Tony Blair and New Labour, the left wing party
stood firm on one value and that was socialism. More on Labours old
Values and policies
The conservatives on the other hand have very different policies or
not so different as some may argue. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher
lead the conservative government from 1979-1990 and she made some very
radical changes that have stuck. After the Thatcher years there was no
turning back, some say that we are all Thatcherites now.
"Across the world governments are almost regardless of party
introducing economic reforms resembling the Thatcherite programme.
This suggests that Thatcherism in Britain was a necessary adjustment
to changing patterns in the world economy."
Thatcher attempted to introduce historically different policies and to
replace the cooperative policy style of British government. The most
important changes Thatcher made were economic and these policies were
three fold. Her first and probably most famous was an attempt to
change the structure of ownership. In the 1980's Thatcher privatised
nearly half of the services, which had previously been publicly owned
in 1979. The Thatcher government thought that doing this would
generate income helping to cut taxes. Although many labour supporters
thought that this would see services such as the railways going down...
... middle of paper ...
...ic no longer trust Tony Blair and
the labour government Butler is correct when he says; Tony Blair's
decision had 'significant implications'. This is reminisant to when
Margaret Thatcher took Britain to war in the Falklands (1982) because
she consulted no-one in her decision. Although there is one major
difference, the Falklands Island War, or more importantly the victory
of this war boosted Thatcher's popularity rather than suffering a loss
of popularity like Tony Blair.
Another similarity between Blair in Thatcher is there 'special
relationships' with the USA and in particular the USA presidents. Tony
Blair had his first meeting with Bill Clinton in May 1997
One thing that can not be ignored is the recent queen's speech. This
contained one very important and much debated issue that is university
tuition fees.
It must be considered when viewing the achievements of Labour that in 1924, the Labour government was not in a position to push ahead with radical policies, as a minority in the house of commons a Conservative vote and abstinence of a liberal support would have brought the government down. A heavy reliance on the liberals existed in the first labour government which some argue restricted them heavily, policies such as nationalisation and disarmament had no chance of being implemented. Also due to its reliance on the Liberals its relationship with trade unions was damaged as they felt they were not being represented as well as promised. To labour this was a large problem as trade unions provided most of their funds, however to be too sympathetic to the unions would make it difficult to project an image of their party as genuinely national. Labour theorised that a gradual series of changes would be more beneficial to their aims, and using their rise to power in 24 as foundation stone to prove their capability in government, their socialist views were still present, however were a realistic take on Labours ability to bring change to Britain, which was at this point vastly limited.
In conclusion, before David Cameron came into power, the Conservatives were in the right side of politics were Thatcher left them. He brought the party closer to the centre. He changed people’s perception about the Conservative party because he changes a lot of things leaving few things unchanged. David Cameron definitely moved the party to the centre of politics.
Firstly, the ‘U-turn’ policies of 1971 to 1972 demonstrate clearly the lack of control that is evident throughout Heath’s premiership. Cracks were beginning to develop after these policies, which indicate a rough start to Heath’s reign. This is evident as the economic U-turn established that there was a growing number of unemployment and a growing inflation record that reached over one million. There were cuts in taxation and lows interests increased borrowing and house prices. Compared to a period of ‘affluence’ in Wilson’s government especially with his social policies, there is unprecedented change as the inflation demonstrated that the retail prices rose by 8.6% between 1970 to 1973 which acclimated to the U-turn policies in 1971-1972 which demonstrated a retreat from the free market and principles that had to be outline to maintain full employment leading Heath to give state aid to key industries including Rolls Royce. However, the ‘U-turn’ policies demonstrates largely that Heath had been seen by the public that he was too willing to give up on his aims and objectives, lacking a clear sense of direction indicating that the failures situated in his government led people finding him unreliable as a PM.
In recent times the in the UK we have seen the more frequent use of
This essay will address whether New Labour contained policies with which it wished to pursue, or was solely developed in order to win elections. It is important to realise whether a political party that held office for approximately 13 years only possessed the goal of winning elections, or promoted policies which it wished to pursue. If a party that held no substance was governing for 13 years, it would be unfair to the people. New Labour was designed to win elections, but still contained policies which it wished to pursue. To adequately defend this thesis, one must look at the re-branding steps taken by New Labour and the new policies the party was going to pursue. Through analysis, it will be shown that New Labour promoted policies in regards
More than a century later, President Abraham Lincoln passed the Morrill Land Grant Act of 1862 which enabled more than 70 colleges and universities to be created (Staff). The GI Bill in 1956 gave Veterans an opportunity many could not afford before. All of these instances in America’s history have made it easier for ordinary American citizens to learn more about the world they live in. There are numerous opportunities for the leaders of this country to help the issue of college tuitions rising, it is just a matter of initiative. As Bernie Sanders states in his “Public College Should Be Free” speech to the senate, “It is time to build on the progressive movement of the past.” When all younger people with the determination and the aptitude can reach their full potential, regardless of their economic or social circumstances at birth, America will have a tougher economy and a stronger democracy, a motive that goes back before Americans today can
middle of paper ... ... d therefore the smaller parties can be considered to have very little effect on the overall political situation. In conclusion, the UK can still best be described as a two party system, provided two considerations are taken into account. The first is that Conservative dominance victories between 1979-97 was not a suggestion of party dominance and that eventually, the swing of the political pendulum will be even for both sides. This can perhaps be seen today with Labour's two landslide victories in 1997 and 2001.
The Thatcherism ideology was part of the establishment of privatisation, cutting off the taxes and reducing public expenditure in health and care services in order to improve Britain’s economy, as a consequence more than 50 identities were privatised by
George Bush and Niccolo Machiavelli are two very influential political figures that share some similar ideals. Machiavelli's work was never intended to be applied to republics, or a democratic government. The advice written in The Prince would have likely been applied in the time of absolute government, when countries were ruled by one leader. It is a work which, as Machiavelli himself says that his philosophy is only applied to principalities, or what we call dictatorships in modern times.
Tuition and fees has extremely risen over the past years which makes it extremely difficult for both social economic groups to invest in a higher education for their families. Today’s college students borrow and accumulate more debt than previous years (The White House). For instance, “In 2010, graduates that borrowed money graduated with owing an average of more than $26,000”(The White House). As a result, President Obama has expanded federal support to help more families and students to afford higher education (The White House). Also, he believes that it is a shared responsibility of the federal government, states, colleges, and universities for making higher education
in their accounts of power in the US and the UK, but that mainly they
Who holds the power? Which religion is stronger? In Bless Me Ultima, a coming of age story of a young boy, the protagonist struggles with the issue of which God should be followed, worshiped, and reverenced. The theme of power in religion is portrayed throughout Anaya’s book in various ways and means such as Ultima, Mrs. Marez, the sign of the cross, and Antonio himself.
Tuition increases in the U.S. have been causing controversy since shortly after World War II.
Orwell takes his perspective of power to a whole other level. He brings in war and weapons. He brings up the topic about atomic bombs and how they all started as just a rumor, but soon crept in fear upon citizens and nations thinking about how easily it would be for one person could end the whole mankind’s existence as easily as just setting off fireworks. He also brings up the fact that the government gives people the right to own weapons such as while rifles, muskets, long bows and hand-grenades and this endangers a lot of people. This is a more of a threat than a protection . A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon — so long as there is no answer to it — gives claws to the weak.
It is well known that the British political system is one of the oldest political systems in the world. Obviously, it was formed within the time. The United Kingdom of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the constitutional monarchy, providing stability, continuity and national focus. The monarch is the head of state, but only Parliament has the right to create and undertake the legislation. The basis of the United Kingdom’s political system is a parliamentary democracy. Therefore, people think the role of the Queen as worthless and mainly unnecessarily demanding for funding, but is it like that?