Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
U.s constitution vs texas constitution
Conclusion for texas and u.s constitution
U.s constitution vs texas constitution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: U.s constitution vs texas constitution
Bills are defined as a draft of a proposed law presented to parliament for discussion. Governor Grey Abbott has vetoed 42 bills so far. He uses the original documents and his conservatism to make his desions . He argues that if the bills will to pass than the state government will grow stronger. The smaller bills that he vetoes, he looks at it and sees if it favors one part of a state more than the other which could be unfair and unethical for the government if it favored one part of a state than another. If he is dealing with criminal and election bills he favors the present state system than making any changes. The large amount of bills vetoed by Grey Abbott has been the largest vetoed bills since Rick Perry who vetoed 56 bills in the year …show more content…
2007. The author of the House Bill 4103 is Guillen and the sponsor was Garcia.
This bill did, was to extended the municipal court judges term. The bill states that a municipal court judge can serve for two years in the office. However, they can serve more terms if municipality provides a longer term for them. If a municipal court judge is not reappointed within the 91st day of the expired term of the one in office at that time. Than the one in office at that time will continue to serve another term after the expired term date. These judges can do the duties that they are responsible for without any additional oath or other requirements under the Article XVI, Section 1. The reason why governor Abbott vetoed this bill was because according to the Texas Constitution all elected and appointed officers have to take the oath. Even when the existing officer is beginning a new term they must re-take the oath. He also adds that no judge from the municipal court should be excused from protecting and preserving the Texas Constitution. This is the reason why governor Abbott objected to the bill 4103. I agree because we do need to preserve the Constitution and if we change this than is could create loop hole for other crimes and there won’t be meaning to the constitution since it will be ignored on the part that talks about …show more content…
oath. Furthermore, the author of the bill 3511 is Davis and Sarah the sponsors is Huffman. This bill deals with the contents of a financial statement that are electronically filed out by a person. The bill states that a person who fills a verified financial statement electronically with the help of another person or another authority. Doesn’t have to include a swan statement with the person’s signature on the finical statement if the person has received an electronic filling password in accordance to the law and the password is used to file the statement. Governor Abbott states that Texas should have accountability and transparency from the public officials and this bills weakens the ethics laws that are governing officeholder financial disclosures. I agree to this because the signature is a way of showing accountability and this should be kept secret . The bill 3390 was by Larson and sponsored by Perry.
This bill is about a written agreement about a firearm that cross a property line. The Bill states that there should be a written agreement and a contact information regarding the property. A person is protected from prosecution under this bill if the person owns a property from both sides of the property line were the firearm crossed. They may also have a written agreement with the person who owns the property on either sides of the property that the firearm goes over. The agreement must contain information such as telephone number and the mailing address of the person who is using the firearm. Also the property must be identified on either side of the property line the firearm crossed and be signed by any person who owns property from either of the line that was crossed. Governor Abbott objected to this bill because the present day law states that its already illegal to fire across a property line unless the person owns both part of the land themselves or has some kind of documents to prove it. This bill will contain more of the person’s personal information which could increase prosecution of hunters and people who fire across other’s property. I agree with the governor because this bill requires to much of the personal information of a person and firing across another person’ property is illegal to do which is why this bill shouldn’t be
passed. In conclusion bills are passed to fix problems that are present in our states. Such as the bills mentioned above. However, sometimes these bills can violate people’s rights and not be under the Texas Constitution. Bills that don’t follow and protect the constitution and protect ethics of the government is sometimes questioned by governors like governor Abbott. Being a conservative and sticking with the orthodox ways also makes him make his dessions.
The “Whitewater” scandal was a real estate scheme by the White Water Development Corp. Both President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary Clinton were involved in the scandal to make a land deal. Many people were involved in the scheme, which was held in the 1980s in Arkansas. Bill Clinton and his wife maintained their funds by the support of the Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan, which represented the Clintons in the overthrow of their Whitewater shares. The Clintons were being investigated when there were improper campaign contributions, political and financial favors, and tax benefits.
Texas Constitution is long and detailed, containing a range of statutory provisions that specify exactly what the government is allowed to do and is prohibited to do. In case of any public policy challenges, public
President Clinton vs. President Nixon The recent scandal in the White House has brought my attention to the American Presidents as people and Presidents. Looking into the American history and her presidents I have found out that presidents are not just political figures but that they are also people. In my research I will compare and contrast two of the American presidents - Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon. President Clinton and President Nixon both associated themselves with criminal actions.
Constitution, creates a unitary executive whereas the Texas Constitution creates a plural executive government. In the Texas Constitution, the government is plural executive and disperses the power among several elected officials. On the other hand, the U.S. Constitution creates a unitary executive, which concentrates the executive power on a single representative, the president. The president has a right to veto any bill he dislikes, but the Congress is also able to approve a bill if the president refuses to adopt it. In the Texas Constitution, there is a line-veto which allows the governor to veto specific items on the legislature of bills passed. The Texas government is more of a limited government whereas the U.S. constitution grants power to the president. Furthermore, in the U.S. Constitution the legislative branch is responsible for making the laws being very limited in government spending, and in the Texas Constitution there were detailed restrictions on tax and specific policies depending on the states legislatures. Legislatures are not allowed to oppose a tax on personal income and are forbidden to make states government develop into debt. Even though the Constitution was ratified, the anti-federalist adopted the Bill of Rights, which promises basic human rights to citizens. Moreover, 27 amendments are in the U.S. Constitution; nevertheless, the state
In my analysis of the Texas Constitution I will assess the three branches of our State Government, the Legislative Branch, Executive Branch and finally the Judicial Branch. Our State Government resembles our National Government in various ways but also in very different ways which we will review in this essay. I will identify a handful of criticisms and problems associated with the provisions in each of these branches of our State Government and identify suggested reforms that many feel are needed.
The Supreme Court only oversees certain cases that must follow certain guidelines, and their main role is to interpret the Constitution. The Supreme Court of Texas is the final appellate court in the state of Texas, and all of its jurisdictions are final, unless it is in criminal law matters. As expressed earlier, the Federal Constitution is the foundation of our country and the most used document within politics, the Supreme Court allows an interpretation of the constitution within changing times that apply to the entire nation and is often where much change occurs within policies. To have a “final say” in important cases that affect our entire nation based on a foundational document shouldn’t be a power that is left to individual states. To be a Supreme Court Justice, one must be nominated with advice and consent from the senate by the President of the United States. There are no other qualifications and they serve on the court for the rest of their lives or until they retire. While to serve on the Supreme Court of Texas, one must meet specific qualifications, such as: “…being licensed to practice law in the state, a citizen of the United States and of Texas, is at least 35 years old, and has been a practicing lawyer, or a lawyer and judge of a court of record together at least ten years.” Not only must a Supreme Court Justice of Texas meet the specific
There has been considerable debate recently in Canada over the issue of gun control. The Canadian parliament enacted the Firearms Act to enforce gun control by requiring gun owners to register their firearms. Just recently, the government of Alberta lead in a charge, including five other provinces and numerous pro-gun groups, complaining that the law is unconstitutional and intrudes on provincial jurisdiction. They also claim that the act infringes on property and civil rights that are guaranteed in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Parliament contends that the government of Canada is within its rights to protect public safety. Pro-gun control organizations, police chiefs and the City of Toronto also back the Firearms Act. The enacting of the Firearms Act by the government of Canada is legitimately constitutional and is within the jurisdiction of Parliament as it only seeks to protect the well being of Canadians. Furthermore, this legislation does not intrude on provincial jurisdiction because it is a representation of all Canadian’s rights.
Our government here in Texas has three major parts that play a significant part in our decision making process. These levels have been deigned to decentralize power and make it more affective for the public's needs. The primary level is the Texas legislature. It is almost a given to say that everyone has at least heard of the legislature. Some variables that the legislature contains are the Lt. Governor, the Speaker of the house of Representatives and Committee Chairs. The Speaker acts as the presiding officer over the house and has two levels of power. These two levels are institutional powers which allow the officer to preside over the Legislative Audit Committee and Sunset Advisory Committee.
Perhaps one of the most interesting times in a president’s administration is during the end of his term in office. Having reached the ultimate goal in a politician’s career, a president no longer has to worry about public opinion or any of the other political give and takes that usually influence a politician’s actions. He is truly free to act as he pleases almost free of consequences. Bill Clinton’s final days in office certainly demonstrated this fact. Using the ultimate unchecked executive power of clemency Clinton issued over 140 pardons and thirty six sentence commutations. He protected over a million acres of land through the creation of six new national monuments. He also nominated nine new federal judges. Clinton also issued a number of executive orders during this time. Unlike most previous presidents who laid low during their last days in office, Clinton was in a flurry of activity trying to exert some last bit of influence from his office. The reasons for his actions are wide spread, ranging from political to personal. The results of his actions were extensive, affecting many situations in the American political and judicial realms. The final days of Clinton administration may be the most controversial of a presidency that was full of tumult and plagued by scandals.
Society’s concerns about protection from violent crimes involving firearms have encouraged Canadian Parliament to pass tougher gun control legislation. The Federal Government responded by passing Bill C-68 that created the Firearms Act, which came into effect in December of 1998. This is by far the strictest gun control law to date. Many Canadians objected to this legislation and wanted it repealed because they believe it is an unnecessary waste of tax dollars to further license and monitor law abiding gun owners. Firearm laws have become an extensive debate in society and also politics.
The implementation of gun control in the United States is a large problem as it will take away the 2nd Amendment rights of citizens, while preventing law abiding citizens from protecting themselves from criminals.( Noyes, 3) The right to bear arms is promised to citizens of the United States. Crime is very high in states that have loose gun control laws. The state of Texas is known to have the most lenient gun control laws of any state in America.( Noyes, 6) However, the solution of taking guns away from people who are registered and licensed to carry them with no criminal record is not the answer to the problem. Americans have never responded well historically to prohibitions. (Baldauf, 7). Public concern about gun control has grown in Texas in the last two years due to the constant violence caused by Mexican drug cartels on the Mexico and Texas border. People in Texas have different beliefs when it comes to gun control, there are those who believe gun control laws are effective in reducing crime, those who believe that gun control laws are ineffective against crime, and those who believe that private owner ship of guns reduces crime.
...rage American to purchase a handgun are being presented to our legislation. Although most are turned down most bills are aimed toward handguns.(Clint Best)
William Jefferson Clinton?s eight-year term as president of the United States of America was one of the most corrupt, and possibly the most damaging ever. There is evidence connecting him to hundreds of deaths, injuries, and explosions. He, along with his administration, made a number of ?Faustian bargains and policy blunders?
...eryone on the ‘lookout’, it is hard to just live your life. “None of these bills actually prevent violence. Rather, they help deteriorate the quality of life in our communities” (Roth 1). Guns are ruining our communities by showing the people that it is acceptable to take action if you are frightened. Sometimes, taking action can be the worst possible solution to a crisis. If a person takes action, it shows that you are brave, but, it also shows the criminal that you are actually a threat to them. This would raise the death toll significantly.
Lately, the top story in the news day after day, months after months have been about William Jefferson Clinton, also known as Bill. Who could blame them, there is nothing better than a story out of the ordinary, especially one with presidential status. For the past months he has been the most talked about figure, being the essential topic for news, talk shows, late night comedy and even going as far as the big screen. Talk about 'Primary Colors' and 'Wag the Dog.' What has gotten to me the most however, were the constant flow of Republicans, along with a few Democrats, who just want to say how shocked and embarrassed they are along with the people of the United States.The president had not just become the most talked about figure, but also one history had ever seen, so far that is, breaking the record and becoming a topic of conversation and debate 'twenty-four seven.' The people, who I think were most affected by this crisis and feel very sad for, are the Republicans, since they had lost severe amount of sleep over the president's bedroom crisis. They had to perform their republican duties by shocking our brains with the president's affair with Monica Lewinsky. We had to ignore the rest of the world news and its issues while they plough through the valley of lies, abuse of power and something they called high crimes and misdemeanors.