Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critically analyze the gospel of mark
The nature of Mark's gospel
The nature of Mark's gospel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critically analyze the gospel of mark
The Jesus the King by Timothy Keller’s explanation of Jesus through the Gospel of Mark correspond with Dr. Watson’s explanation of the Mark. Even if the interpreters were different, the analyzation of Mark was very similar in detail. Some of the similar interpretations can be seen in Parallel of Jesus the Old Testament, Hinge/Pivot point of the Mark, and Jesus in Suffering.
Dr. Watson and Timothy Keller both compared John the Baptist as the new Elijah. Dr. Watson uses the description of John the Baptist provided by Mark to prove him as the new Elijah. Dr. Watson described John the Baptist as a man with leather belt and camel hair clothing. The Elijah’s description matches John the Baptist’s with him being hairy man and leather belt. The return of the Elijah was fulfilled with John the Baptist’s arrival to prepare Jesus’ path (Watson, 45). Keller explained John the Baptist as Elijah by Jesus’ statement. Jesus said to his disciples how Elijah’s coming and execution heralds Lord’s coming and execution. Keller adds more information to Jesus’ statement by mentioning Elijah’s execution as parallel to the John the Baptist’s execution of beheading (Keller, 128).
…show more content…
The Hinge/Pivot point of Mark was determined by Peter’s confession of Jesus as Christ by both Dr.
Watson and Keller. Dr. Watson said the second part of the Mark begins with Peter’s confession at Caesarea Philippi, where theme of Jesus as a suffering servant begins (Watson, 47). Furthermore, Dr. Watson lists the cruel punishment called the crucifixion Jesus had to went through with its process (Watson, 48). In the beginning of the chapter nine, Keller states Mark 8 as pivotal chapter (Keller, 103). Jesus accepts the confession made by Peter, but explains further how He have to suffer in order to save the humanity (Keller, 104). The focus began to shift from who Jesus is to Jesus’ purpose (Keller,
121). Dr. Watson and Timothy Keller both mentions the suffering of Jesus. However, Dr. Watson explains the purpose of Jesus in Suffering was written while Keller explains why it was necessary for Jesus to suffer. Dr. Watson explained Jesus as the Suffering Servant. Dr. Watson carries this interpretation further by emphasizing how Mark wrote his gospel to the newly converts to encourage them in the suffering. Dr. Watson explained the persecution towards Christianity in Rome was in the need of encouragement and therefore the Gospel of Mark was written (Watson, 43). Keller explains Jesus’ suffering as necessity for personal, legal, cosmic matters in chapter nine. It is because one need to have the true love from Jesus to feel the joy (Keller, 108). The Jesus’ suffering also earns true forgiveness no human can ever receive alone by the good works (Keller, 110). Keller explained Jesus’ suffering as the only way to free people from the corruption of the world’s kingdom (Keller, 112).
From noon on, darkness came over the whole land until three in the afternoon. And about three o'clock Jesus cried with a loud voice "Eli, Eli, lema sabachthani?" that is, "My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?" When some of the bystanders heard it, they said, "This man is calling for Elijah." At once one of them ran and got a sponge, filled it with sour wine, put it on a stick, and gave it to him to drink.
After reading and studying Markan text, it is clear what he thought of Jesus as a person and a leader. The way that Mark writes and the descriptions that he chose to include truly give a Markan picture of Jesus. Consequently, his words also are used to relate the words of Jesus with Mark’s contemporaries. It is crucial to include every aspect of Mark and his audience when using Markan text to study Jesus.
Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every nation. (Mark 16:15)
Mark groups different parables and sayings of Jesus by topic; making a false impression that these things happened in order. This may have little effect on changing the meaning of the lesson, however it illustrates the fact that Mark was trying to author a "readable" story for people, rather than a book of facts. The best example would be in Mark 10:17-31 (Jesus Counsel to the Rich) & (Parable of The Camel and the Eye of a Needle). It is doubtful that these things happened at the same time; however, they are GREY in The Five Gospels anyway ... and probably didn't happen as Mark describes. This brings us to Mark's writing style.
The Gospel of Matthew is an eyewitness story written for an audience of believers, under great stress, and persecution. Matthew develops a theological plot incorporating genealogy, speeches, parables, inter and intra textual references, common vocabulary, and fulfillment quotations, with a tension that builds as we are invited into the story. The crucifixion and resurrection bring us to a Christological climax that symbolically points beyond its conclusion to God’s Kingdom, bringing atonement, salvation and the ushering in the Eschaton. The extraordinary events surrounding the crucifixion act as commentary, adding important details concerning the death of Jesus.1
One of the main characteristics of the gospel of Mark is it’s length. Mark is much shorter than Matthew and Luke, but what it lacks in quantity, it makes up for in quality. The author of Mark does not slow down the gospel story and makes sure that only important and relevant details are included. When Mark is compared with Matthew and Luke, it becomes obvious to see what Mark has eliminated. The author’s omission of Jesus’ birth, lineage, resurrection, and ascension denote careful planning and purpose in the gospel of Mark.
Mark’s portrait of Jesus as a servant originates from the middle of the first century, Mark wrote his gospel during this time of persecution because the people being oppressed lacked faith that God would provide for them. Mark gives them the model of Jesus as a man submissive to the Lord so that they can receive salvation if they remain faithful to the servant of God. Mark stresses that Jesus is a suffering Messiah with the passage concerning Jesus praying to God that “Abba(Father), all things are po...
This work is also said to be anonymous, and believed to have been produced in Syria within a large Jewish and Jewish-Christian community. It is apparent from a number of shared accounts, and overlapping stories of Jesus that the author of Matthew’s Gospel used Mark as a source. Although many of the stories are expanded upon, and carry different connotations, the same basic stories are found in all of the synoptic gospels, and because Mark was the first written, scholars assume it was a source used by both Matthew and Luke. It should also be noted that many of Jesus’ teachings in Matthew were not found in Mark. This led scholars to search for a second source, which resulted in the Q document. Although not available as a feasible document, Q designates a compilation of Jesus’ parables and sayings from about 50 to 70 CE, which are present in Matthew (Harris p.156). Throughout the gospel, Matthew uses formula quotations, meaning he quotes from the Old Testament. This strong relationship with the Hebrew Bible helps scholars determine that Matthew wanted to emphasize his Jewish position. This is important because his interpretations of Jesus throughout the gospel are not agreed upon by all Jews, in fact only a small fraction. Although it is obvious to the readers than John and Matthew carry very different stories of Jesus’ life, it is interesting to
A curious thing that Mark never mentions throughout the entirety of the gospel is Joseph, Jesus’ earthly father. The beginning of Mark continuously reiterates that Jesus is the Son of God, the gospel’s first verse is a clear example, “the beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God.” Again towards the end of the gospel in verse 15:39 Jesus is clearly declared as the Son of God, “and when the centurion, who stood there in front of Jesus, saw how he died, he said, ‘Surely this man was the Son of God!’” The beginning of Mark does not have a nativity story and the end does not continue to the resurrection story, so in beginning and ending the gospels with the proclaiming of Jesus as the Son of God the author is saying that Jesus was the promised savior and he was perfect rather than being seen as a simply son of a
Mark 8:34 is the only time on the Gospel when Jesus calls the crowd together with disciples because his message is of very high importance. The price for discipleship is a complete denial of yourself in the name of God . And the mission of Jesus is to bring this message to humankind through his suffering and death on the cross. In Mark's gospel Jesus provides his identity which becomes the turning point in the human history. Before He was teaching, healing the sick, had scraps with authorities and established a group of disciples . Was it his mission? No. Jesus is the Messiah.
This closely resembles when Simon Peter is scolded by Christ as he asks him “Simon are you asleep… the indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak” (Mark 14.37). The fact that Simon is a choir boy, gives him sort of secondary status, makes his resemblance more like an apostle in the presence of Christ. This biggest misunderstanding of Simon's character comes from his death. The murder does resemble the Crucifixion of Christ, but only partially. “In fact, most of the apostles and many ordinary Christians of that period died on crosses...all of them murdered by mobs” (Krugar).
Mark was Peter's son (I Peter 5:13, possibly spiritual son), who wrote down what Peter said about who Jesus was, what He did, where He went and what happened; Mark's gospel is therefore Peter's account, an eye-witness account, written down by Mark.
The New Testament teaches about who Jesus is and what he did on the earth. John wrote the last of the four gospels which recount Jesus’ life and what is to come. The gospel of John is somewhat different from the other three gospels, in that it is more symbolic and less concrete. For example, John expresses Jesus as the Passover Lamb when Matthew, Mark, and Luke do not. This gospel is showing that Christianity is moving away from the long-practiced Jewish traditions. John’s gospel can be laid out into four parts: the prologue or the incarnate word, signs of the Messiah with teachings about life in him, the farewell teaching and the passion narrative, and the epilogue or the roles of Peter and of the disciple whom Jesus loved. The Gospel of John is arguably the most
The Quelle source is information that consists in both Matthew’s and Luke’s Gospel. Now give that mark’s Gospel is rather short and has difficulties, it is interesting to
At this time, he wasn’t seeking for men to bow down to him, he was on a mission of humility, to serve all of humanity by dying on the cross. Mark skips all the lineage and genealogy of Jesus, because it is not relative to the viewpoint that God wanted presented in this book, and it was directed at a completely different audience. It is believed to have been the first of the gospels written, and is focused on the audience of the Romans which were the ruling Gentile power at that time. No one is interested or concerned with the genealogy or lineage of a servant, and therefore it was excluded to achieve the proper focus. The first eight chapter very clearly reveal the divinity and power of Jesus Christ, as he performed many miracles.