Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Questions about the suez canal
Essay on suez canal
Impact of world war 2 and the holocaust on arab israeli conflict
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Timeline
1869 – Suez Canal opens after 10 years of construction at a cost of $100 million, it is owned by Egypt and France.
1875 – Egypt is forced to sell its shares (44%) of the Suez Canal Company to United Kingdom due to mounting debt.
1922 – Egypt becomes independent from the UK
1952 – Egyptian Revolution deposing monarchy and installing Muhammad Naguib in power.
1954 – General Gamal Abdel Nasser gains de facto control of Egypt after deposing his fellow Free Officer, Naguib.
1955 – Nasser announces trade and military deals with communist nations such as
Czechoslovakia and China; Soviet Union expresses willingness to sell Nasser as many weapons as he desired.
1956:
• July 26 – The President of Egypt Gamal Nasser announces the nationalization of the Suez Canal. This is followed by the refusal of funding the Aswan Dam Project by the United States of America and the Britain. They blamed the state of the Egyptian Economy but many believe that it had more to do with Egypt’s decision to recognize China and buy weapons from Czechoslovakia, which at that time was controlled by the Soviet Union.
• August 1- Britain, USA and France hold emergency talks on the emerging crisis.
• August 2 – Britain mobilizes armed forces, after freezing Egyptian assets.
• August 16- An International Conference of 22 nations held in London on the Suez Crisis. Egypt is absent for the conference. Although no communiqué is issued at the end of the conference 18 nations agree a way forward based on the idea of international management of the canal.
• August 21 – Egypt declares it is willing to negotiate ownership of Suez Canal if Britain withdraws from Middle East.
• September 2 – Eisenhower issues communiqué to Eden declaring the US would not supp...
... middle of paper ...
...greed reluctantly to withdraw its troops under further (mainly economic) pressure from the US. (Britain was dependent on the US for the survival of the survival of the British pound).
• December 23- British and French troops complete withdrawal.
The UNEF takes control of the Suez Canal as British and French troops complete their withdrawal. Egyptians celebrate in Port Said chanting "Long live Nasser".
• January 9, 1957: British Prime Minister Sir Anthony Eden resigns citing ill health but widely believed to have quit over Suez.
The Prime Minister announces his resignation saying he has been advised by doctors to take more rest. At the height of the Suez Crisis he went abroad to recuperate after falling ill. Although he retains his personal popularity his reputation as a statesman has been badly damaged by the Suez Crisis and his resignation seems inevitable.
The assault was a dual operation with British forces and was of great significance because of the Suez Canal. This assault aloud allied forces to move through the Western Front into North Africa for the Allied forces (Nieves, 36th Combat Engineers - 2826th, 2827th & 2828th Bns , 2015).
The British polices and leaders continually undermined the citizens of the colonies. It was the British elitist views that continually caused poor policy and leadership decisions. Instead of using a diplomatic approach Britain continued to try to assert dominance over the colonies. These same issues and arrogant attitudes would eventually cost them the war.
In the Middle East, by July 1956, tensions were rising. The Egyptians were denied funds from the Us, Britain and the World Bank for the creation of their Aswan dam to affiliation with the Soviet Union. In desperate need of funds for the dam project, the Egyptian government had nationalize the Suez Canal Company, froze its assets in Egypt, and proposed to use canal tolls to pay for the dam (Hillmer, 1999, p. 226). In fear of the Egyptians cutting off the transportation of Arabian oil and Asian goods, the British, French, and Israel secretly planned an attack on Egypt. Meanwhile, the Israelis and the Arab states, including Egypt, were having an arms race. Israel was concerned with self-preservation while the Arabs, who had opposed Israel's creation, wanted to destroy it. The Americans opposed the British, French, and Israeli invasion of Egypt because it didn't want to offend the Arab states where US oil companies were drilling. On the other hand, the US was wiling to supply Israel with weapons if the Soviet Union sent arms to the Egyptians. Such military support could inevitably have lead to a nuclear war. Through ties with Britain, Canada was expected to aid in the invasion pf Egypt but Canada was reluctant and saw how much actions might put their relationship with the Americans in danger.
The crisis took place on the Suez-Canal in Egypt during the cold war years of the 1950’s. Gamal Abdel-Nasser was in charge of Egypt in 1954. He wanted to improve conditions in Egypt, and so he decided that he would build the Aswan Dam. In order to fund the construction of the dam he seized the Suez- canal, and charged each passage that sailed across it. The British, French, and the Israelis, who strongly opposed the idea, used this as a reason to attack Egypt.
First of all, imperialism was not something the Egyptians wanted. They witnessed the decline of the Ottoman Empire, and that acted as a wakeup call. They can either keep up with the modernization of the world around them, or be overwhelmed and lost among it (Modern World History, 354). They decided to make new reforms as an attempt towards modernization. One of these attempts was the Suez Canal. It was a waterway that connected the Nile River, Mediterranean Sea, and the Red Sea. The labor costed over 100 million dollars, and it opened in 1869 (Rosenberg). The Suez Canal, along with other reforms, put Egypt in a rough economic state. The British wanted control over the canal because it was the main route to India and its other colonies. Because of the huge debt, Egypt was forced to hand the canal over to Britain. Later, in 1882, Britain gained control to Egypt itself (Modern World History, 355). Thus, Egypt was under new rule and became one of Britain’s many colonies. To sum up, Egypt created many reforms ...
Nichols, David A.. Eisenhower 1956: the president's year of crisis : Suez and the brink of war. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2011. Print. (tags: none | edit tags)
Meyer, Bruce, Dr. "Suez Canal Crisis." CBCnews. CBC/Radio Canada, n.d. Web. 07 Dec. 2013. .
away as result of tuberculosis disease, he decided to step down of the Second minister of
...d took control of the Gaza Strip once again. Anwar el-Sadat then became president after Gamal Abdel Nasser died in 1970. In an effort to take control of the Sinai Peninsula, Anwar el-Sadat attacked the Israelis. After a cease-fire, the United Nation’s troops then returned to keep things peaceful. Israel then later withdrew and was only allowed to use it for non-military purposes. In 1978 a peace treaty was established between Egypt and Israel which influenced more peace in the Middle East. Although a formal treaty was signed in 1979. In 1981 Sadat was assassinated and Mohamed Hosni Mubarak followed him in presidency. The Sinai Peninsula was then returned to Egypt in 1982 after the Israeli troops withdrew from the region. Mubarak embraced Sadat’s policies and managed to climb to the top and be once again making Egypt known as one of the leaders of the Arab world.
Egypt appealed to Great Britain for several reasons and was imperialized in 1882. Egypt was rich in ivory, gold, and spices (Berard). Great Britain was in...
Egyptian exports thrived on the back of cotton, which Ali attempted to consolidate into a government monopoly. Egypt’s focus on cotton production made it an export-heavy territory that was dependent upon European manufacturing imports from the West. In order to facilitate its exports, a robust transportation system was necessary. Egypt developed a railway from Cairo to Alexandria as well as ports along the Mediterranean coast because of its dependence upon the European market.
Before the war began, the British Parliament took tighter control of trade within their 13 colonies due to the debt Britain was in. Britain also raised taxes in order to carry them out out of debt at the time.
of the Aswan Dam on the Nile River in Egypt. Nasser managed to build this important
...ed to nationalize the Suez Canal through which three fourths of all European oil is passed. After several months of negotiations Britain, France and Israel attacked Egypt and retook the canal. United Nations condemned their actions and forced them to give up the canal to Egypt once again. As a result of the Eisenhower convinced Congress to approve the Eisenhower Doctrine that would “assist any nation in the region that required aid against aggression from any nation controlled by International Communism.” The Eisenhower administration was very careful not to alienate any Middle Eastern countries that could provide the country with a steady supply of oil and this affected his foreign policy and the policy of containment.
It was in 1882 when Britain acted alone to gain occupation of Egypt. Not too long after that, Britain was successful, and they captured the canal along with defeating the Egyptian army at Tel-el-Kebir. This notion of imperialism is what Michael Pearce wrote his book, Death of an Effendi (2004) about. Death of an Effendi takes place in Cairo in 1909. Gareth Owen, Chief of Cairo’s Secret Police, is called to investigate an interesting murder. The murder was interesting, because the man who was murdered was a foreign effendi, not one of Egypt. Pierce writes this mystery from a narrator’s aspect. The narrator is not Pierce or Owen, so what I found interesting was that the narrator channels Owen’s thoughts and views of Egypt, and tells the story mainly through Owen’s point of view. The narrator wants readers to be aware of the foreign colonial presence, but more specifically, the narrator wants us to be aware of Britain’s presence and power in Egypt. The narrator seems to privilege Owen’s perspective on things, and Owen claims that he sees Egypt through eastern eyes, but is that believable?