The White Australia Policy

3184 Words7 Pages

In the wake of what historians are calling Australia’s “history wars,” a look at the factors leading up to the passage of the controversial White Australia Policy is significant. It may be difficult to understand and interpret all the implications of the Australian public’s concerns in the fifty years before leading to its passage, however a look into the historical events and the language used at the time is a crucial step. This paper chronicles the sequence of events between the arrivals of the first Chinese indentured laborers in the 1840s to the passage of the White Australia Policy in 1901, using a critical eye to view the arguments brought against the Chinese by the European diggers, labor union leaders, popular press, and politicians. Based on the events of the time and the context they occurred within, this paper argues that the assertions against the Chinese were concurrently economically and racially grounded. Australians alike were threatened by the competition brought by Chinese immigrants who easily entered new industries for sub-standard wages. However, the arguments against Chinese morality and race added intensity to the movement that was necessary in gaining popular support for the legislation across Australian societal factions.

Following the discovery of gold outside of Bathurst and facilitated by the opening of ports in Southern China for trading purposes, Chinese immigration to Australia drastically increased in the fifty years before the passage of the White Australia Policy in 1901. A migration of this magnitude would undoubtedly impact the landscape of any country, and negative reactions to the Chinese immediately swept over the colonies. Fear of economic competition and a degraded standard of living wa...

... middle of paper ...

...al ideology of the times.

The passage of the White Australia Policy in 1901 was the product of fifty years of building tensions. From the early contacts with the Chinese indentured laborers in the pastures, to the violent outbursts witnessed in the goldfields, and to the antipathy industrialized Chinese faced in the cities, there is no question that the economic impact of the Chinese immigrants led to calls for restrictive legislation. However, the racialism that erupted immediately as further justification exhibits the fact that economic concerns may not have been strong enough to cause general public outrage across factions of society. The two fed off of each other, but in the end this paper argues that without the backdrop of racial ideology so inherent in public opinion of this time, the White Australia Policy may not have garnered such unanimous support.

Open Document