Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rise of the labor movement
Rise of the labor movement
Rise of the labor movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rise of the labor movement
Labour leaders in Canada in the late 1800s and early 1900s were strongly opposed to the idea of Asians immigrating to Canada. In “Constructing the Great Menace” by David Goutor, it outlines the oppression of Asians by labour leaders which does not conclude that labour leaders hated all immigration and had a prejudice against all racialized groups. The unionists’ main argument for this opposition is based on the stereotype that Asians were claimed to have “accepted low wages and degraded working conditions” thus proving that they will diminish the standard of living for Canadian workers. These Labour Leaders were prejudice to Asians in an effort to supposedly protect Canadian workers and their jobs. However, it is not fair to say that labour …show more content…
But that is not the case in this situation, labour leaders perspective on blacks clearly reveals their sole lack of oppression on Asians. For example, in the article David Goutor discusses how the labour leaders approach to African-Americans was entirely opposite to that of Asians, he says “Labour leaders’ often declared that they wanted no part in the widespread racism against blacks in Canada. Unlike those faced by Asians, the hardships and discrimination blacks faced were not seen as a product of their ‘uncivilized’ character.” (Gotour, 52). This reveals that labour leaders didn’t want to be involved in the racism of blacks although these leaders were significantly prejudice to Asians. This prejudice and spread of false stereotypes towards Asians is seen in many ways by portraying them as inhumane individuals who were going to worsen the standard of living of Canadian workers. Labour leaders viewed Asian immigration as a threat because they could potentially take away the jobs of Canadian workers in a capitalist …show more content…
Furthermore, the evidence supporting the Canadian labour leaders’ view on other racialized groups significantly had to do with the treatment other countries had on these similar groups. For example, the article states that in the United States “The Knights of Labor in America were particularly committed to this cause, bringing in more than 90,000 black members by 1887.” (Goutor, 53). The actions of other nations such as the U.S played a role in the actions of Canadian labour leaders, therefore it is unfair to say that labour leaders hated all immigration and were prejudice to all racialized groups. Additionally, labour leaders went on to portray the Chinese as “sexual predators who sought to take advantage of white women.” (Gotour, 49). These diminishing portrayals of Asians (typically the Chinese) clearly reveals the labour leader’s prejudice views on only the people of Asian descent. The false accusations on Asians made it clear that labour leaders were prejudice to specifically
The Canadian Pacific Railway was the first transcontinental railway built to connect Canada from coast to coast. (Canadian Pacific Para. 9) The construction almost delayed completely because of John A. MacDonald losing power, but it was finally continued with the help of a syndicate. (Canadian Pacific Para. 4) Due to the insufficient amount of adequate workers in British Columbia, Chinese contract workers were imported to help construct the track with minimal pay and harsh conditions. (Canada Para. 1) Chinese-Canadians were discriminated by being given the most dangerous job, no food or shelter provided, and the least pay. Unfortunately, when the track was completed, the Exclusion Act for Chinese immigrants was established to stop immigration from China, (Calgary Chinese Cultural Centre Para. 5) while also making it impossible for family members from China to immigrate. (Calgary Chinese Cultural Centre Para. 11)
Zong L. & Perry, B. (2011). Chinese immigrants in Canada and social injustice: From overt to
Vancouver currently maintains an image as a sort of maternal ethnic melting pot, a region rich in cultural diversity and with a municipality that is both tolerant and welcoming of various displays and traditions. However, upon closer examination of recent history, it becomes clear that the concept of the city embracing minorities with a warm liberal hug is both incorrect and a form of manipulation in itself. The articles Erasing Indigenous Indigeneity in Vancouver and The Idea of Chinatown unravel the cultural sanitization that occurred in Vancouver at the turn of the nineteenth century as a means of state domination. Through careful synthesis of primary documents, the articles piece together the systematic oppression suffered by BC indigenous people and Chinese immigrants, reformulating our perception of the interests of the Canadian government.
In the year 1957, Canada elected its first Prime minister without English or French root, John Diefenbaker. While growing up in the city of Toronto, because of his German name, he was often teased. [1] He grew up as an outcast, and so he was able to relate to the discrimination and inequality many of the minorities in Canada felt. This essay will attempt to answer the question: To what extent did Prime Minister John Diefenbaker help promote equality to the minority communities. . The minorities in this time period were the women, aboriginals, and immigrants. During his time as the Prime Minister, he was able to help protect the rights of this group because many of their rights were being abused by the society. Diefenbaker also helped the minorities to stand up for themselves and other groups. Diefenbaker was able to bring positive change to the minority communities by making an official Bill of Rights and appointing people of discriminated groups to the parliament while other members did not.
Harold Cardinal made a bold statement in his book, The Unjust Society, in 1969 about the history of Canada’s relationship with Aboriginal peoples. His entire book is, in fact, a jab at Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s idea of ‘the just society’. Pierre Elliott Trudeau made great assumptions about First Nations people by declaring that Aboriginal people should be happy about no longer being described as Indian. His goal was to rid Canada of Indians by assimilating them into the Canadian framework. Considered by many as a progressive policy, Trudeau’s white paper demonstrates just how accurate the following statement made by Harold Cardinal at the beginning of his book is : “The history of Canada’s Indians is a shameful chronicle of the white man’s disinterest,
...panese Canadian Interment and Racism During World War II." IMAGINATIONS. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Jan. 2014.
Gould, W. (1977). Black workers in white unions: Job discrimination in the United States. London: Cornell University Press.
Asian’s and Black’s struggle with the legacies of cruelty which in turn has reduced the value of human life to dust—the residue from refugee, slavery, and loss; all ties in together as we view souls who live in such a colorful place, but who originally viewed the world as black and white. Toronto embodies 2.5 million faces with many of whom originate from various places of the worl...
was the driving factor that ultimately resulted in the internment of the Japanese Canadians. Racial prejudice against Orientals had been around in B.C. since the 1850s when Chinese immigrants came to Canada to help with the construction of the Canadian Pacific Railway. A newspaper article described the Chinese as a “marvelous human machine, competent to perform the maximum of labour on the minimum of sustenance” (Adachi 42). While they were beneficial for contractors, they posed a threat to the white population (Figure 3). The cartoon suggests that the low living standards of the Chinese allowed them to endure the harshest conditions, while being satisfied with the lowest wages. In contrast, the typical European is portrayed as a civilized human being who cannot compete with the Chinese workers without sacrificing his dignity. As a result, when the Japanese started immigrating to Canada later on, the British Columbian population only saw them as another threat to their culture due to the similarities they shared with the Chinese. However, the Japanese proved to be a greater problem since they were not affected by the Head Tax imposed on the Chinese (Hickman, 33; Morton). The attack on Pearl Harbour was an excuse that finally allowed British Columbians to release the anti-Japanese sentiment that they had been suppressing for years. In addition, when the final decision to intern the Japanese Canadians was passed, the government considered them all as potential threats (Figure 4). There was no effort made to distinguish those who posed potential threats and those who did not; most of them had no connection with Japan besides for their ancestry. This can only be attributed to racism, as there are only 38 suspects out of the 22,000 internees. Similarly, selling of Japanese property was another racist act that the government claimed to be necessary for the war effort and to increase national security (Sunahara 90; “The War Years”).
-Despite the already severe legal and social restrictions on Asian immigration, some European Americans felt that immigration should be forbidden altogether with a specific Asian Exclusion Act. In arguments which seem familiar to modern followers of the immigration debate, Asians were accused of taking white jobs and causing social
Systemic discrimination has been a part of Canada’s past. Women, racial and ethnic minorities as well as First Nations people have all faced discrimination in Canada. Policies such as, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, provincial and federal Human Rights Codes, as well has various employment equity programs have been placed in Canada’s constitution to fight and address discrimination issues. Despite these key documents placed for universal rights and freedoms Aboriginal and other minority populations in Canada continue to be discriminated against. Many believe there is no discrimination in Canada, and suggest any lack of success of these groups is a result of personal decisions and not systemic discrimination. While others feel that the legislation and equality policies have yet resulted in an equal society for all minorities. Racism is immersed in Canadian society; this is clearly shown by stories of racial profiling in law enforcement.
...rreporting of workplace discrimination and harassment (TIEDI, 2011), it’s highly arguable that for some, while their grasp on the language may be minimal, their ability to recognize and thus personally experience racial discrimination on a personal level is not affected. Racially-motivated harassment within the workplace often leaves the individual with progressively high feelings of alienation and low job satisfaction overall, adding to the strains that exist within the cracks of Canada’s multicultural base.
Race and gender have no biologically legitimacy. They are a social construction that has been determined by the culture surrounding Canada. Through this social construction, the concepts of whiteness and heteronormativity have evolved into becoming the social norm and anything straying from this path is deemed inferior or wrong. The hierarchy of race in Canada remains central to the daily interactions and the institutions that frame this country. The concept of white privilege is taught to not be recognized by the ‘white’ community. Schooling does not teach one to realize they are the oppressor or a participant in a damaged culture. What We All Long For investigates these issues that damage the culture of Canada. It shows the resistance of racialized minority groups in order to break down this corrupt structure.
Hastings is the organizer of the school strike. His perspective on the school segregation in the British Columbia educational system is against the segregation of children based on their ethnicity. For “he agreed to conduct the fight of the Chinese against separate classes for Chinese children. The main allegation made by the Victoria School Board was that Chinese Immigrants did not have a fundamental understanding of English. However, Mr. Hastings contradicts this statement by stating that, “The fact was that they (referring to Chinese children) stood at the very top of their classes.” As well as that it was “Less expensive and more secure to educate your child in this country rather than in China because of the very unsettling conditions around Canton.” In the protest the children of Chinese descent resumed going to their classes in the Victoria school system, and were specifically told not to accept any certificates. This action was described as “a clever way of trying to divide the community against itself.” In Mr. Hastings point of view he thought “the educated and enlightened part of the public in Victoria was swung over to the Chinese side.” In retrospect, Mr. Hastings was in full support of the integration of Chinese children in the Victoria educational system and was the organizer of the school strike in order to stop the discrimination of Chinese children in Victoria’s public
In today’s world, you can easily recognize a Chinese man or woman while crossing a street in a busy town in the United States. The influx of Chinese immigrants nowadays has been straightforward acknowledged since many corporations established by Chinese men. This, however, was not a common scene you would see back in the late 1800s. In 1882, the Chinese Exclusion passed by the government had restricted free-immigrants to the US and emphatically prohibited Chinese immigrants. The question has been given: “Why did Chinese receive so many negative comments and critiques from Americans, particularly the nativists, that strong enough to force them to flee out of the US? What happened? Did they deserve to be treated poorly and non-defensively?”.