Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Oppression and discrimination
Oppression and discrimination
Oppression and discrimination
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Oppression and discrimination
The Value of a Name in The Language of Oppression by Haig Bosmajian
In Haig Bosmajian's essay, "The Language of Oppression," he speaks of the value of a name. "To receive a name is to be elevated to the status of a human being; without a name one's identity is questionable." A human being is defined by his name. Without a name no one knows who he is, for he has no identity. However, a name can also be "used as a curse." Language can lead to the dehumanization of human beings and can ultimately lead to their extermination. As Bosmajian says, "Just as our thoughts affect our language, so does our language affect out thoughts and eventually our actions and behavior." When the Nazis took over the Jewish population, they were only able to accomplish this through the use of oppressive language. They re-named Jews as "bacilli," "parasites," "disease," "demon," and "plague." Because of the implementation of these names, people began to believe the Nazis, and the extermination of "six million human beings" was viewed as a "Final solution." Language affects all aspects of our lives. Language and names can inspire us and motivate us but can also belittle us. As Stokely Carmichael said, "...people who can define are masters." When a person is given the power to change one's name and identity and to define, they are given the powers of a master, and therefore are seen as a leader. Bosmajian wants this oppressive language to stop. He wants the belittlement of humans, caused by their differences, to cease. Clearly, the only way to do this is to rebel against the use of these words and eliminate the categories they create.
Santha Rama Rau illustrates Bosmajian's point in her essay, "By Any Other Name." She speaks of her...
... middle of paper ...
...ply be objects that looked different. However, we do have names, and they have been used in the past and present to harm us. In Santha's story, we read of her
experience as a young girl in school. Not only did the abuse of her name cause her pain, but also it caused the entire Indian society its reputation. This oppressive language has been used for many years, and continues today. I, as a young girl in junior high school, experienced the hurt of linguistic oppression. I went through a lot of confusion and pain because of the abuse of my name. Will this oppression ever stop? It is almost a tradition now, and traditions aren't easily broken. Bosmajian wants the oppressed to stand up for themselves and stop this abuse. However, as he points out, "the resistance usually comes from the oppressor…" The oppressor will not give up the power of defining others.
names are prevented from being able to reassimilate within society, they are the outcasts. It also
Classification and symbolization are stages of genocide that happened in the book Night. Classification is shown when the Germans were taking the Jewish people and “all foreign Jews were expelled from Sighet.” classifying Jews between foreign and local (Wiesel 6). Classification is not necessarily a ‘bad’ thing to do because mankind classifies things throughout history but it is shown that
"Why can 't black people just work harder?" Hard work results in success, and black people are in many cases looked at as less successful than white people. Therefore, that means that black people simply work less hard than white people. This is the perspective that many privileged white people may have when discussing the issue of white privilege. They fail to realize that white privilege plays a significant role in what opportunities someone might have. In Princeton University student, Tal Fortgang 's essay, "Checking My Privilege: Character as the Basis of Privilege", he criticizes those who tell him to "Check your privilege". He argues that the phrase discredits his achievements, and that white privilege is not the reason that he became
If we started all over before any names were made and altered these names towards other races how would people react? Lets take the Cleveland Indians for example. What would happen if we had used the Jews, Blacks or Chinese as this political cartoon suggests. Every race involved would have been in an uproar when the caricature came out. They would feel that their constitutional rights were being ignored. But, when "Chief Wahoo of the Cleveland Indians, runs about drunkenly at baseball games"1 they feel that it is ok to disregards the Indian name, heritage, and ritual. Taking in the psychological considerations for the Native Americans "dehumanization, as the word implies, is a psychological process that reduces a person or group to a sub-human level. One...
Dehumanization has been around for many years and seen all throughout our world’s history. Dehumanization means to deprive of human qualities, personality, or spirit. In history, people had been dehumanized for all types of reasons, whether it be because of race, gender, age, sex, or any other characteristics. One of the most brutal and memorable examples of dehumanization was the holocaust which took place in many different locations in Europe. Hitler was ruling German at the time and started this disturbing holocaust. Many Jews were dehumanized in this time. The Germans were horrible to the Jews and treated them like they were animals. The Germans had animalized the Jews as shown in the book Maus I and Maus II. Spiegelman depicts the Germans as cats and the Jews as mice because
Life is a valued concept, as are the people and experiences associated with it. However, when one is pushed to the limit of human capacity, they can lose familiarity with the value of their own life. Genocide-- the mass slaughter of a group of people based on their identity-- can have severe effects on the victimized people in a plethora of ways. One can not possibly quantify the grotesque, inhumane treatment witnessed in many genocides. Simultaneously, many victims are vulnerable to their identities being left behind and only their will to survive being left intact. Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor, recounts his experiences being at the hands of a brutal, systematic killing regime in his award-winning memoir, Night. Wiesel
During World War 2, Adolf Hitler referred to the Jewish people as “vermin” or “rats” dehumanizing them. Similarly, the people living in Brave New World and “Harrison Bergeron” also live in a degraded state. The controlling of society through technology makes the citizens of the Brave New World and “Harrison Bergeron” live a dehumanized life. Oxymorons, which are contradicting terms that are combined, are used in both stories, and help explain how technology dehumanizes people. The stories’ inventions and advancements and the censoring used in the society of the stories show this as well.
From a young age we are taught the saying “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” While this may be helpful for grade school children that are being bullied by their peers, it has some problems as it trivializes the importance that words can have. The words that people choose for themselves, as well as the words that others ascribe to a person, have an unmeasurable importance to how people can understand themselves. These labels can be a significant source of oppression or liberation for many people who identify within them. In Eli Clare’s memoir, Exile and Pride, looks at the importance of words as he explores the labels he’s associated with. He does this through mixing discussion of the histories and modern representation
Once again the Jews were picked as scapegoats to help push the political and social agendas of those who held higher office in the form of the Holocaust. Through the processes of propaganda and mass media, the Nazi party was able to desensitize an entire nation of people towards the process of dehumanization. In the reading of Elie Wiesel’s novel Night we were able to gain a personal first hand account of what atrocities were committed against these people in the process of stripping them of their humanity. Upon entering the concentration camps, Eliezer gives us insight into the internal feelings that one experiences when he is stripped of his humanity. He states, “never shall I forget those moments that murdered my God and my soul and turned my dreams to ashes” (Wiesel
Mukherjee then begins to compare and contrast her sister in a subject-by-subject organization. She states, “…she clings passionately to her Indian citizenship and hopes to go home to India when she...
Language always conveys a message. Language can convey a message that is full of manipulation. In Robin Lakoff’s essay, “Everybody’s a Politician”, she discusses how manipulation is used in day to day conversations, even if one is not intentionally trying to manipulate. Language can be used to dominate others. In the essay, “the Language of Oppression” by Haig A. Bosmajian, he explains the power of using names to define others. Language can change the way a person thinks. In the same essay, “the Language of Oppression” by Haig A. Bosmajian, he also discusses the way someone thinks can be changed by language. Lastly, language has the power to degrade an individual. In another essay, by Robin Lakoff, “You Are What You Say”, she explains how
Making a person look less like a human being and taking away their unique features, makes them a target of violence. After dehumanizing someone, a person has less guilt when they have to kill because it is like they are not even killing an actual person but something that is deemed as less than human. Historian Philip Pomper uses the term “instrumentalization” to represent the ability to coerce an entire group of people into doing what another person wants. Pomper described instrumentalization as taking “depersonalization one step further by making subjects tools of group projects or cultural tendencies” (Pomper 287). Once dehumanizing has happened, those in power, like Hitler or the Khmer-Rouge, use instrumentalization to get the people they control to kill. The use of this tactic is apparent in the Holocaust. The thousands of Nazis who would follow Hitler’s every order did so because the mentality of a group is substantially different than the mentality of an individual. In a group, each person is seen as an instrument used to achieve a bigger objective rather than each individual having their own
It arises issues because we tend to take value away from humans and allow ourselves to see them as just items. According to they essay” The Language of Prejudice” by Gordon Allport he describes why the usage of nouns are usually not a good way to describe people. They aren’t right because a “noun” abstracts from a concrete reality some one feature and assembles different concrete realities only with respect to this one feature,” (Allport, 218). He explains why we group people in different categories give each other names as easy way recognition of a certain group. Although we may see no harm in the labels we give each other are nouns that can be racist, stereotypical and demeaning. In result of the nouns we use they cause us classify and overlook all other features of a person making them seem incapable and
Adolf Hitler (the Führer or leader of the Nazi party) “believed that a person's characteristics, attitudes, abilities, and behavior were determined by his or her so-called racial make-up.” He thought that those “inherited characteristics (did not only affect) outward appearance and physical structure”, but also determined a person’s physical, emotional/social, and mental state. Besides these ideas, the Nazi’s believed tha...
Over the course of the novel, The Namesake, by Jhumpa Lahiri, Gogol is constantly moving, and by the time he is in his late twenties, he has already lived in five different homes, while his mother, Ashima has lived in only five houses her entire life. Each time Gogol moves, he travels farther away from his childhood home on Pemberton Road, symbolizing his search for identity and his desire to further himself from his family and Bengali culture. Alternatively, Ashima’s change of homes happens in order to become closer to family, representing her kinship with Bengali culture. Ashima has always had difficulty with doing things on her own, but by the end of the story she ultimately decides to travel around both India and the States without a real home as a result of the evolution of her independence and the breaking of her boundaries; in contrast, Gogol finally realizes that he has always stayed close to home, despite his yearning for escape, and settles into his newly discovered identity - the one that he possessed all along.