Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss the scientific revolution
Essays on scientific revolution
Scientific revolution question
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Name:_________________________________________ Day/Time Class Meets:______________________ HUM 1020 – INTRODUCTION TO HUMANITIES HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT FOR HANDOUT ON THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION Directions: Read the essay entitled The Scientific Revolution: The Disenchanting of the Universe and respond to each of the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Your answers can be either hand-written (in ink) or word-processed. However, you must paraphrase—answer in your own words. If you quote directly from the essay, you should then interpret the quote. (Worth 40 pts. total) 1. The essay starts off by stating, “One could say that the dominant scientific world-view going into the 16th century was not all that “scientific” in the modern sense of the …show more content…
word.” In two or more sentences, explain what this means. We may say that the 16th century was dominated by the sciences, but it was still the early modern period, which is the science was the major factor, but it still related to the religion and under the power of the church. For example, the geocentric theory that was found in the begging of the 16th century, represent the scientific achievement in that era, but the theory was also related to some beliefs like the mover was moving to the center of the earth because it has motions and it want to go home. Moreover, when Copernicus discovered the heliocentric theory and the sun is the center not the earth, he let it be known while he was on his death bed because if he infringed the church, he will go to the hill. So from that perspective, there was a dominant scientific advancement in that time; but it was difficult to violate the theories that were found it by the church. Unlike the 19th and 20th centuries, which were fully full of sciences away from religion. 2. There are several reasons why Aristotle’s theories were not overturned sooner. What are they? A- It was as supremely difficult to escape the Aristotelian doctrine by merely observing things more closely. B- All lows were ruled by deductive method; so, no matter to check if the observation right or wrong. So, no one ever questioned the knowledge gained through the method of deductive reasoning. C- They were is directly linked to the medieval domination of the Christian Church. D- There were no provided powerful arguments. E- No clear explanation for questions such as, how the bodies move? Or why a thing moved? Etc. F- It never defined what the nature of the mover was.
G- Aristotle's theories were accredited by hypothesis which were not able to be testable to become real facts. 3. Who were the four key figures who contributed to disenchanting the view of the universe? They were: Nicolas Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, and Isaac Newton. 4. What specific problem with the apparent motions of the planets was Copernicus trying to solve when he proposed the heliocentric theory? (Be sure you describe the problematic motions that he observed). First of all, what Copernicus was trying to say about Orbit and the Earth that *Circles were the shape of the orbit. * Sun in the middle; everything orbiting around. *Stars are outside circle/orbit, except: the moons orbited the Earth . So from that facts and his theory to solve the planet problem, he explained the retrograde motion. (Retrograde motion is actually an optical illusion because it appears to go backward as Earth passes). *The Earth moves at different speed and one planet passes another (passing phenomenon). *Gets rid of all problems of the planets and makes calculations easier. * The planets closer to the sun move
faster. 5. What was Galileo’s most famous contribution to astronomy? How did this contribution change humans’ view of their relationship with God. (Explain in three or more sentences. Galileo contributed his telescopic discoveries. Galileo made the most important contribution because now we understand much more about our universe. According to Karen S, Galileo contribution, "removed humans from the center of the universe and put great distance between them and God, who must, according to medieval thinkers, exist at the center of creation." 6. What were Kepler’s view about geometry with regards to Creation? Kepler's view about the geometry is that the geometry is the base for everything in the universe even the mind of the God. Geometry provided the God to create this universe which indicates that all man's mind also had been created by geometry system. 7. What was the astronomical problem that had puzzled Johannes Kepler for years? How did the data of Tycho Brahe help him to solve this problem? Kepler solved the mystery of Mars, one of the most puzzling problems in astronomy at the time. Ironically, the detailed records of the challenging planet were the tools Kepler needed to understand how the solar system functioned. When Brahe died in 1601, Kepler managed to acquire Brahe's observations before his family could use them to their financial benefit. Johannes Kepler followed Tycho and developed the three laws of planetary motion. Using Brahe's detailed observations helped Kepler to realize that: 1-The planets traveled in "stretched out" circles known as ellipses. (1st low) (Two planets, traveling on ellipses, would create the appearance of the red planet's backward motion in the night sky). 3- A planet moved slower when it was farther away from the sun than it did when nearby. (2ed low) 4-The relationship between the period of two planets — the time they take to orbit the sun — is connected to their distance from the sun. (3ed low). 8. Kepler’s third law contributed to the “mechanized view of the universe.” In three or more sentences and in your own words, explain what this means. Kepler's Third Law was published a decade later, and recognized that the relationship between the periods of two planets — the time they take to orbit the sun — is connected to their distance from the sun. Specifically, the square of the ratio of the period of two plants is equal to the cube of the ratio of their radius. While his first two laws focus on the specifics of a single planet's movement, his third is a comparison between the orbits of two planets. 9. Kepler’s significant contribution to the Scientific Revolution was his description of the paths the planets take in their orbits around the sun. What was he NOT able to do that Isaac Newton was later able to do? Kepler was unable to define the force which held the planets in their respective paths. All he knew was that as the planets orbit the sun, they speed up as they approach the sun and slow down as they move away from it; he had no answer for the question of why they vary in their speeds. 10. Modern scientific method is defined as a combination of observation and scientific reasoning. Isaac Newton used this method when he discovered the force of gravity. After reading the account of him sitting in his garden, explain in three or more sentences and in your own words how he arrived at the theory of gravity and how the process he went through illustrates the scientific method. Newton was setting in his garden when an apple fall to the ground. After this observation, he started to think about the force of gravity. He was sure that the gravity force that pulled down the apple is applicable for a height higher than that apple in the tree. Then, he realized that why the moon keeps rotating and sticks around the earth. To more extend, that is the reason to how the planets keep rotating around the sun. Because the scientific method consist of systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses, Newton observed, made a measurement, and started to make hypotheses which helped him to realize what is gravity. From that moment, he tasted his ideas and came with results that proved his hypotheses to become facts, which they are the 3 lows of universal gravitation.
This essay will explore parallels between the ideas of the scientific revolution and the enlightenment. The scientific revolution describes a time when great changes occurred in the way the universe was viewed, d through the advances of sciences during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The enlightenment refers to a movement that grew out of the new scientific ideas of the revolution that occurred in the late seventeenth to eighteenth century. Although both the scientific revolution and enlightenment encapsulate different ideas, the scientific revolution laid the underlying ideological foundations for the enlightenment movement. A number of parallels exist between the scientific revolution and the Enlightenment; there was a decrease in the belief in authority, there was an increased belief in Darwinism, The importance of science grew as beneficial to society, the ideas of society as better off without scientific and knowledge. The parallels between the scientific revolution and the enlightenment will be explored throughout this essay.
Steven Shapin’s book entitled Scientific Revolution begins with the provoking statement that “there was no such thing as a Scientific Revolution” (197). However, he incorporates the stories about the frontiers of scientific tradition and discovery such as Galileo, Boyle, Newton, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and Huygens. Nonetheless, Shapin organizes the book into two parts with the first concerning its organization. It is divided into three sections that ask three essential questions: what was known? (15); how was it known? (65); and what was the knowledge for?(119). Shapin’s claim is that the period of the ‘Scientific Revolution’ was a time in which new answers to these questions were brought up. The second part of the book becomes central to illustrating Shapin’s view.
The scientific revolution can be considered one of the biggest turning points in European history. Because of new scientific ideas and theories, a new dawn of thinking and questioning of natural elements had evolved. Scientific revolution thinkers such as Newton, Galileo, and Copernicus all saw nature as unknowable and wanted to separate myths from reality. During the scientific revolution during mid 1500-late 1600s, key figures such as Isaac Newton and Nicolaus Copernicus greatly impacted Europe in terms of astronomical discoveries, scientific methods, and the questioning of God to challenge the church’s teachings.
The following page focuses on the Revolution in Physics, specifically the scientific works of Max Planck, Albert Einstein, and Werner Heisenberg, all of which took place in the early twentieth century. In this page I will attempt to answer the following question, "How did the Revolution in Physics transform the way that humans viewed themselves and nature from 1715 to the present day?" To effectively answer this question I will cover three main points. I will start off by briefly describing the scientific beliefs that dominated European society in the years between 1715 and the Revolution in Physics. Next, I am going to explain the epoch making works of Max Planck, Albert Einstein, and Werner Heisenberg that were highly responsible for initiating this new era of scientific thinking. Lastly, I will focus in on how humans viewed themselves and nature differently after the Revolution in Physics.
In 1543 Nicholas Copernicus, a Polish Canon, published “On the Revolution of the Celestial Orbs”. The popular view is that Copernicus discovered that the earth revolves around the sun. The notion is as old as the ancient Greeks however. This work was entrusted by Copernicus to Osiander, a staunch Protestant who though the book would most likely be condemned and, as a result, the book would be condemned. Osiander therefore wrote a preface to the book, in which heliocentrism was presented only as a theory which would account for the movements of the planets more simply than geocentrism did, one that was not meant to be a definitive description of the heavens--something Copernicus did not intend. The preface was unsigned, and everyone took it to be the author’s. That Copernicus believed the helioocentric theory to be a true description of reality went largely unnoticed. In addition to the preface, this was partly because he still made reassuring use of Ptolemy's cycles and epicycles; he also borrowed from Aristotle the notion that the planets must move in circles because that is the only perfect form of motion.
Johannes Kepler was a German astronomer and mathematician ho discovered that planetary motion is elliptical. Early in his life, Kepler wanted to prove that the universe obeyed Platonistic mathematical relationships, such as the planetary orbits were circular and at distances from the sun proportional to the Platonic solids (see paragraph below). However, when his friend the astronomer Tycho Brahe died, he gave Kepler his immense collection of astronomical observations. After years of studying these observations, Kepler realized that his previous thought about planetary motion were wrong, and he came up with his three laws of planetary motion. Unfortunately, he did not have a unifying theory for these laws. This had to until Newton formulated his laws of gravity and motion.
Copernicus was a scientist and philosopher whose theory proposed that the sun was stationary, and the heavens orbit around the sun. Galileo tried to convince the Church not to abolish the Copernican theory but was told that he was not to entertain such thoughts with others.... ... middle of paper ... ...(n.d.).
In 1513, Nicholas Copernicus, composed a brief theory that stated that the sun is at rest and the earth is in rotation around the sun. In 1543, just days before his death, Copernicus published this theory in On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres. This theory was meant to dissolve the long lived belief in Ptolemyís theory which stated, "The earth was at the center because it was the heaviest of objects(Kagan331)." This was a common belief at that time, which supported the religious beliefs that the earth was the center of the universe and God in the heavens were surrounding the earth. Copernicusís theory was shocking, but he published such a controversial theory without sufficient evidence, it had to be considered invalid.
Thomas Kuhn's book The Copernican Revolution effectively demonstrates how the conceptual schemes of science are constantly changing and being replaced. Kuhn was able to recount the past with diagrams, and full explanations of the different theories and systems that lead up to the Copernican revolution. He also gave a full explanation of the theories that followed. This book was surprisingly enjoyable to read, and should be read by anyone interested in the evolution of science and western thought.
The revolution brought about many radical changes and ideas that helped to strengthen it and the scientists that helped to bring it about became significant persons in history. "The emergence of a scientific community is one of the distinguishing marks of the Scientific Revolution."2 It was this form of community that gave a foundation for open thinking and observing throughout the sixteenth century and through twenty-first century. It was the first revolution that had more of a dedication to the ongoing process of science than of a goal to achieve scientific knowledge.3
Much to the dismay of the Church, two astronomers Galileo and Kepler had the audacity to challenge the authorities by suggesting that the sun-not the earth-was at the center of the universe. The church had a stronghold on the way the spiritual and physical world worked, so these discoveries only added to the Church’s resistance to their aims. Their discoveries came only after Kepler and Galileo began to question ancient theories about how the world functioned. These ancient truths were widely held but were inconsistent with the new observations that they had made. Kepler had discovered the laws of planetary motion which suggested that the planet would move in elliptical orbits, while Galileo followed with his discovery of the principle of inertia. Galileo concluded his finding b...
The changes produced during the Scientific Revolution were not rapid but developed slowly and in an experimental way. Although its effects were highly influential, the forerunners Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, Isaac Newton, Francis Bacon, and Rene Descartes only had a few hundred followers. Each pioneered unique ideas that challenged the current views of human beingsí relationship with nature. With the backing of empirical observation and mathematical proof, these ideas slowly gained acceptance. As a result, the operation of society, along with prior grounds for faith were reconsidered. Their ideas promoted change and reform for humansí well-being on earth.
Over the course of the years, society has been reformed by new ideas of science. We learn more and more about global warming, outer space, and technology. However, this pattern of gaining knowledge did not pick up significantly until the Scientific Revolution. In the sixteenth and seventeenth century, the Scientific Revolution started, which concerned the fields of astronomy, mechanics, and medicine. These new scientists used math and observations strongly contradicting religious thought at the time, which was dependent on the Aristotelian-Ptolemy theory. However, astronomers like Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and Newton accepted the heliocentric theory. Astronomical findings of the Scientific Revolution disproved the fact that humans were the center of everything, ultimately causing people to question theology’s role in science and sparking the idea that people were capable of reasoning for themselves.
While working as Brahe's assistant, Kepler was given the task of studying and attempting to understand the orbit for planet Mars. The orbit of Mars was particularly difficult because Copernicus had correctly placed the Sun at the center of the Solar System, but had erred in his assumption of circular planetary orbits. After numerous experiments and mathematical calculations, he finally realized the obits of the planets were in fact not circular as Aristotle had previously insisted and Copernicus assumed correct, but in fact were more elliptical in shape. The fact that Mars has the most elliptical of all orbits that Kepler had data on lead to Kepler eventually formulating the correct theory for the Solar System. After Brahe's death Kepler was able to obtain all of Brahe's data and observations. Utilizing the voluminous and precise data of Brahe, Kepler was able to use his realization of the elliptical orbits of the planets to formulate his Three Laws of Planetary Motion, his most important achievement and the one history most notably remembers him for.
middle of paper ... ... Lindberg, David C. Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution. Eds. David C. Lindberg and Robert S. Westman.