The Pros And Cons Of Fukushima Nuclear Power

Energy is undoubtedly one of the most important issues facing the world today. While fossil fuels may produce enough energy at a low cost, it also has severe environmental impacts on the world. Wind energy is a clean source, but is also extremely expensive to maintain. Nuclear energy may be the best energy alternative to coals and oil, with the ability to produce much more energy with relatively low cost, while also being more environmentally sound.
Nuclear Power comes from the process of splitting Uranium Atoms (also called fission), which in turn releases copious amounts of energy in the form of heat. When the atoms are arranged in a reactor, the splitting of an atom will cause nearby atoms to split, forming a chain reaction. As the energy is released, it is sent through coolant tanks full of water, which is then heated into steam. The steam is channeled and used to spin a turbine, which in turn powers a generator,
Following a severe earthquake and Tsunami, 3 reactors were damaged, similar to Chernobyl. However, the event was contained with minimal nuclear leaks and no deaths. The surrounding area has already been deemed safe. Despite this, many still fear events such as this. The problem is, they should not. “As a nuclear engineer, it is depressing to read the recent reports on the Fukushima nuclear incident — not because of the incident itself (at this point I strongly believe that we will remember Fukushima as evidence of how safe nuclear power is when done right) — but because the media coverage of the event has been rife with errors so glaring that I have to wonder if anyone in the world of journalism has ever taken a physics class.” (Yost, Keith. What happened at the Fukushima reactor? Mit.edu) What he is essentially saying is that the nuclear reactors were properly managed during the event, and a major incident was avoided. He believes it instead to be a testimony to the safety of nuclear