Three Mile Island Pros And Cons

514 Words2 Pages

What is going to happen to Three Mile Island? Should it be shut down or should it remain open? I

think three mile should be shut down. TMI (Three MIle Island) has not been profitable, and nuclear

power is not the cleanest energy source. However nuclear energy is cheaper than fossil fuels, and the

TMI gives people jobs. Here is why I think it should be shut down and what just might keep it open.

Three Mile Island should be shut down. The nuclear reactor was first built in 1968 but wasn't open

until 1974. Since it was built about 50 years ago the reactor is older than one that was built in 20016.

The reactor being shut down might have a huge affect on the community now but what if in a few

years, or a few months Three Mile Island could have …show more content…

On top of it being cleaner it is cheaper the mining of uranium is cheaper than the mining of coal

or harvesting of oil. Three Mile Island saves the government money from not having to import

oil,coal, and natural gas, since we have uranium right here in the United States so no need to import

any. Three Mile Island is producing clean and cheap energy.

To take the pros and cons about why and why we shouldn’t keep Three Mile Island open and why

we should keep it open. Here is a table of pro’s and the con’s.

PRO’S CON’S
Cheap energy
Could have a malfunction
Clean resource
Uses nonrenewable resource
Saves the government money
The owner of TMI said the power plant has not been profitable for about the past five years
Jobs (if shutdown people will lose their jobs)
Destroying habitats with the mining of uranium

This will be a debate will the government and the owner of TMI shut it down or will they keep it

open? I think they should shut it down. If Three Mile Island stays open or shuts down the citizens

Open Document