In Malory’s “Le Morte Darthur,” there are two different swords, the sword in the stone and Excalibur. These two swords can represent many different things, including the sword in the stone representing Christianity and Excalibur representing Paganism. Malory accentuates the differences between the sword in the stone and Excalibur to portray the power struggle between Christianity and Paganism to reflect on the real life power struggles between the two viewpoints.
First, the Sword in the Stone and Excalibur are two different swords in Malory’s version of King Arthur. According to the book, Arthur “… handled the sword by the handles, and lightly and fiercely pulled it out of the stone…” This is the passage that explains how Arthur stumbles
…show more content…
among the sword in the stone in the first place. When he received Excalibur, the Lady of the Lake lent it to him in exchange for a gift, to be determined at a future date. Secondly, the sword in the stone represents Christianity.
Malory says, “So when he came to the churchyard, Sir Arthur […] handled the sword by the handles, and lightly and fiercely pulled it out of the stone…” The sword in the stone from the church, which is portrayed in this example, is the epitome of Christianity in the tale of King Arthur. Though the storyline contains much magic and mystery, that is not what is present in the passage of the sword and the stone. There are numerous different reasons that we could recognize Christianity in this story, this is one of the better scenes because of its raw religious motives. The first clue of this is that the sword is in a stone at the church. Obviously, church was important enough in the story to have the one thing that would prove the future king in its midst. Another point is that with the sword sticking into the stone, the base would be sticking out, upside down, resembling a cross, which is the main symbol for Christianity. Furthermore, this passage portrays Christianity because of the belief that royals are “appointed by God”, or what is also called The Great Chain of Being. Every person who had witnessed the sword in the stone spectacle truly believed that only the future king could draw the sword, because there was only one future king, who had been appointed by
God. Excalibur represents Paganism. Merlin told Arthur, “’… for the scabbard is worth ten of the sword, for while ye have the scabbard upon you, ye shall lose no blood be ye never so sore wounded.’” This evidence shows the presence of paganism in Excalibur through the explanation of the magic that is connected to it. Merlin tells Arthur that as long as he has the sword, he will not be wounded. Obviously the magic in this story is hinting towards the paganist roots that were so widely believed in Malory’s time. Malory uses the swords to explore these deeper topics because maybe he wanted to show the common power struggle between the two religious reviews. Throughout all of history, we seem a theme of paganist v. christian views struggling for the upper hand. Even throughout the entire story of Arthur, there is never a concrete winner in this struggle. Though the characters in the story seem to be Christian for the most part, there is magic, and mystery laced all throughout the story as well. Malory used the power struggle in his story to display the real power struggle between the two religious views in real life. In conclusion, though Malory’s opposition of these two swords could be thought of in different ways, in my opinion, the most prominent one is that of Paganism v. Christianity. This argument is made to help us view the struggle that is happening between the two religions in real life.
It will be the contention of this paper that much of Tolkien's unique vision was directly shaped by recurring images in the Catholic culture which shaped JRRT, and which are not shared by non-Catholics generally. The expression of these images in Lord of the Rings will then concern us.
King Arthur, a courageous man, who was able to pull out a sword from a rock as simple as possible. As for everyone else who tired, it was almost impossible. This was just the beginning stage of Arthur becoming a king. The thing that Merlin didn’...
Who was King Arthur? Most people would tell of a great King; a devoted circle of heroic knights; mighty castles and mightier deeds; a time of chivalry and courtly love; of Lancelot and Guinevere; of triumph and death. Historians and archaeologists, especially Leslie Alcock, point to shadowy evidence of a man who is not a king, but a commander of an army, who lived during the late fifth to early sixth century who may perhaps be the basis for Arthur. By looking at the context in which the stories of King Arthur survived, and the evidence pertaining to his castle Camelot and the Battle of Badon Hill, we can begin to see that Arthur is probably not a king as the legend holds.
In discussing the Jewish sentiment about paganism, Plaskow reveals that hatred of other religions, reinforced by religious texts and aspects of culture can cause Jews to not know how other traditions have shaped their own. Plaskow argues that by hating paganism, the Jewish community misses out on parts of their own history. By pushing away paganism, Jews disguise “the important role that concrete artifacts played in ancient Jewish practice” (Plaskow, [Jewish Anti-Paganism], 1999, 111-112). By ignoring this fact, Jews prevent themselves from seeing the entire picture and the history of their tradition’s beginnings. Additionally, by being uneducated on how women played roles such as “dancers and diviners, musicians and priestesses” in the early days of their religions, Jews have allowed their tradition to exclude “women from religious leaderships” (Plaskow, [Jewish Anti-Paganism], 1999, 112). While Plaskow does not believe that paganism be directly incorporated into the Jewish tradition, only that the paganism should be attended more “closely and critically” in order for the tradition to not suppress “real human beings and distort our understanding of ourselves” (Plaskow, [Jewish Anti-Paganism], 1999,
When Christianity was first brought to the isle of England by the Romans in the fifth or sixth century, it heavily influenced the ancient pagan religions that were pre-established by the inhabiting Anglo-Saxons. The two very different faiths quickly began to merge and Christianity adopted certain aspects of pagan mythology before eventually overwhelming it. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight gives the reader an interesting look at the different values of paganism and Christianity. Along with Christianity, the Romans brought massive amounts of infrastructure, a feudal system, and the notion of romantic chivalry. The character Gawain expresses all of the essential elements of chivalry; piety, purity, and humility. In Burton Raffel’s translation of Sir Gawain and The Green Knight, the dissimilarities between Gawain and the mysterious Green Knight serve as a microcosm for the contractions among contemporary Christian and pre-existing pagan ideologies.
The Legend of King Arthur is in comparison to The Epic of Gilgamesh because Arthur's closest companion was Merlin, and Gilgamesh's closest companion was Enkidu and neither Gilgamesh nor Arthur forgot their friends. Enkidu only came in contact with Gilgamesh after becoming a man. Enkidu released the animals from the hunter's traps when they ere caught, so to make him a man the prostitute slept with him so that the animals would be ashamed of him and reject him. King Arthur became aware of Merlin when he was a young man. When Arthur was born Merlin placed him in the care of Sir Ector, throughout his boyhood Arthur learned the ways of chivalry, knighthood and how to become a gentleman. At the tournament one day Arthur pulled Excalibur from the stone and this is what brought upon Arthur meeting Merlin once again. In The Legend of King Arthur, Merlin exclaimed, "it is the doom of men if they forget." Gilgamesh along with Enkidu together fought and killed Humbaba, protector of the Cedar forest, and the Bull of Heaven, sent as punishment to Gilgamesh for killing Humbaba. King Arthur nor Gilgamesh forgot their faithful friends.
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight is a medieval poem by an unknown author, written in Middle English in the 14th century. This poem is uncanny to most poems about heroism and knightly quests as it doesn’t follow the complete circle seen in other heroism tales. This poem is different to all the rest as it shows human weaknesses as well as strengths which disturbs the myth of the perfect knight, or the faultless hero. The author uses symbolism as a literary device in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight to give the plot a deeper and more significant meaning. Symbolism is used to emphasise the difference of this heroism story against others and therefore symbolism is of great importance in this poem. The importance of the following symbols will be discussed in this paper; the pentangle, the colour green, the Green Knight, the exchange of winnings game, the axe and the scar. This paper argues the significance of the use of symbolism as a literary device in the poem Sir Gawain and the Green Knight.
For many centuries, Literature critics have constantly debated on whether it was more inspired by Pagan or Christian beliefs. These said critics have constantly been trying to differentiate between the symbolism used to describe the Pagan symbols and Christian symbols within the halls of Horathgar and the Castle lived in by the King of the Geats. These symbols can be argued to symbolize Pagan or Christian symbolism due to the fact that they can either describe the beliefs of Pagan or Christians. These include but don’t exclude; the heroic might of an epic hero, being portrayed as a Christian or Pagan hero. Examples of Pagan beliefs will include the following of Wyrd the Pagan belief in fate. Examples of Christianity will be Beowulf’s dislike
One link between the Legends of Arthur and the Catholic Church was Chivalry (the oaths of a knight). Arthur made all his knights take these oaths, which for the most part had to do with the teachings of the church. They were to remain loyal to the church and always obey its teachings and direction. A knight had a strong belief in Christ and other biblical figures. Some knight were even ordered to do a specific job for the church such as defend the church.
One of the first literary work studied by our class was “Beowulf,” the longest and greatest surviving Anglo-Saxon poem. The poem is packed full of Christian and Pagan elements that are constantly fighting for the dominant position. In order to understand these thematic elements portrayed throughout “Beowulf,” we must first discover
With the creation of the Christian religion followers of it obtained peace and tried their best to avoid the impurities of the world, interestingly enough, these “worldly” impurities consume the religion that is Paganism, which Christianity is heavily based off of. As time has progressed mankind has always searched for their purpose. Religion is often used to help one discover their ultimate purpose and give them guidelines to live a pure life by that may be amorphous without spiritual guidance. The religious fundamentals in Christianity help its believers to fathom why they are on this Earth and what their greater purpose is. Unknowingly, they develop their character through this religion without knowing that it is heavily stemmed from Paganism! Many practices, cultural elements, and habits in Paganism are strongly seen as ignoble by a majority of the modern Christians. A supreme amount of the text in the Seamus Heaney’s translation of Beowulf help to entirely clarify the religious transitions that have occurred between both Paganism and Christianity. Throughout the ages, human beings used a religious power to help them evaluate their lives and wellbeing, specifically Paganism, Christianity; the transition from paganism to Christianity illustrates how much religion effects one’s life.
King Lear is a Christian Play About a Pagan World It is evident that King Lear contains references to both the Christian and Pagan doctrine. However, they seem to be expressed in entirely different styles. King Lear is purposefully set in a pre Christian era with numerous references to classical Gods but conversely there appears to be a striking resonance of Christian theology throughout the play. These echoes appear in various forms including the idea of Edgar being a Christ-like figure and also the presence of a supposed divine justice. Therefore there is truth in the view that although King Lear has a pagan setting, its significance is ultimately relating to Christianity.
The influence of religion on culture often manifests itself in the literature of the time period. In The Dream of the Rood, Christian tradition is synthesized with Anglo-Saxon culture. Against a backdrop of cultural practice, The Dream of the Rood recounts the story of the crucifixion by taking into account the time-honored qualities and values of the Anglo-Saxon people. Taking place within the context of a dream and told from the perspective of the Cross, The Dream of the Rood re-configures and presents Christ as a typical Anglo-Saxon hero. Christ, adopting elements of the hero Beowulf, is shown to be a warrior for his people, manifesting the virtue of bravery and waging war against sin and death. In like manner, the character of the
The poem’s intricately balanced structure challenges the reader to seek out a resolution coherent with his or her own ethics. An admirable knight of King Arthur's renowned court, Sir Gawain is directed by a complex set of ethos, a collaboration of principles symbolized by the mystical pentangle. A five-pointed star composed of five interlocking lines; the figure represents a multitude of guiding tenets, representing both religious and knightly ideals. One can recognize that “the pentangle cognizance is explicated by the poet to signal Gawain’s complete Christian perfection, and for the reader to be aware of contemporary concerns about magical protective practices, hinting at human frailty” (Hardman 251).
The image of Jesus nailed to a wooden cross by the palms of his hands and with a crown of thorns wrapped around his head is one that has transcended all time barriers. It has inclusive been replicated into figure form that is utilized in various ways but whose primary function is to serve as a constant reminder of the physical suffering endured by Jesus. In The Dream of the Rood however, the perception of Jesus Christ as not only the son of God and savior of mankind but also as a human with the capacity to feel pain, is subverted when through the perspective of a personified cross he is conveyed as a warrior in the midst of combat. The portrayal of Jesus in this way immediately evokes the image of an ideal stereotypical hero who is strong, courageous, and unrelenting in appearance. Nevertheless, it can be said that this type of hero is more inclined towards fantasy than it is based on reality because these idealized heroic figures have only ever truly existed in a fictional universe. The depiction of Jesus as a warrior thus, undermines forms of heroism that stem from explicit suffering that is not concealed but rather expressed by the individual.