Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pepsi vs. coke comparison
Does the sexualisation of women in advertising impact society
Essays about gender portrayals in advertising
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pepsi vs. coke comparison
Pepsi was first represented in the beginning of 1890 with the purpose to relieve indigestion. Not until 1960’s, Pepsi received successes that competed against Coca-cola. Pepsi has always been a drink for the young generation, but now they want to change the association.
The Pepsi ad tries to show the basic human need for fun. It’s a picture of a Pepsi drink being bubble blown by a middle aged business man dressed in a suit. The image of a conservatively well-dressed man contrasting with the overflowing, bubbly drink immediately catches the attention of the consumers. And it is then directed to the caption at the bottom right hand corner. It’s all a state of mind, and you can’t help but smile at the thought that no matter how old you get,
…show more content…
Coca-cola is using the body ideal to catch the audience's attention. The woman to the left, who symbolize the coca-cola bottle is smaller and taller compared to the girl who stands beside the pepsi-bottle. The purpose by showing two different sized women is to convey the advantages for their own brand and make it worse for their rival. Either Coca-cola wants us to associate them with fewer calories than Pepsi or they want the audience to feel more comfortable when they are drinking coke. The main purpose is to make us, especially women to feel younger, smaller and fresher when we’re drinking coke, since the model to the left is a reference of a perfect …show more content…
To summarize, Pepsi tries to create a new target audience which is adults. Compared to Coca-cola, Pepsi does it more fair and success to create a more divine atmosphere. In my point of view, this is a winning concept in the long run.
Coca-cola wants to create frustration and anxiety in their ad, which might catches more attention, but it’s not an agreeable strategy. The companies didn’t either share the same audience target. Pepsi targeted adults and Cola targeted women, but the main-idea was to obstruct the rival.
Both ads convey their purpose very clear. Coca-cola wasn’t really in need of their text “choose wisely”. The purpose was clear enough to understand without the quote. Compared to Pepsi who used “Forever young” as a slogan, which was needed to clarify the purpose further.
Both ads were in a need of humans to make sure their aim reached the audience. Even if they had two different strategies, their ideas were conveyed with a help of models. Pepsi used a older man and Coca-cola used two
Pepsi by all means, will not hesitate to when promoting their products and in fact, Pepsi has been spending over one billion dollars on advertisements, gaining thirty-four millions Facebook likes and two million Twitter followers (O’Brien. "Coca Cola vs. Pepsi: Comparing Sales, Earnings & More"). They also sponsor some of the famous American sports for instance, NFL (national football league), the NHL (national hockey league), and just recently, they have also replaced Coke, as a NBA sponsor (national basketball league) who was a major sponsor for two years in a row (Alesci, Rooney). Pepsi has a huge impact of today's generation and will not balk at anything to come to the
Although the ad lacked enough material for it to be eye catching, the ad itself was not confusing. It presented its product, messages, and color in a precise fashion. Coca Cola purposely chose black, red and gray to appeal to both men and women. The fact that the ad is aiming to include everybody is a solid point. The diet coke ad also managed to fit in Ethos, Pathos, and Logos within its ad. To cap it off the ad hid arrows with font, positioned the bottle to point to the top, and also managed to add a taunting factor to bring in audiences. It was an ingenious way to hide everything behind a simple non-moving picture. And who knows there might be more things lurking in the same ad. In fact, companies are always hiding several messages behind their advertisements. Just remember the art of advertising is sneaky and there is always something behind the
Catchy jingles are what persuades consumers to buy more and more products that they hear about every day. This concept has been around for years and the Coca-Cola Company is no stranger to it. Back in July of 1971, Coca-Cola released the commercial, “I’d like to Buy the World a Coke” that sent their customers into chaos with over 100,000 letters being sent to the company asking for more. This leaves many people asking: how did this one commercial have such an impact on the audience? And what did Coca-Cola use that drew so many people in? Here we will discover the method behind what is “I’d like to buy the World a Coke.”
The millennial generation is known as the generation that has grown up with an overly optimistic view of world. When they eventually make their way out into the world they are often hit hard by the brutal fact that the world they grew up in does not revolve around them. The millennial generation is seen as less religious, less inclined to making critical independent thoughts, and not as involved in civic engagements as previous generations. Throughout the Pepsi advertisement, many of these views are contradicted and fought. The commercial starts in a city and focuses on individuals one of which is Kendall Jenner. Each individual is drinking Pepsi and working in the area of the city where a peace protest is happening. Eventually, each breaks
The Pepsi Generation commercial was made and effectively used. It persuaded people to drink Pepsi instead of Coke by using multiple tools, like ethos, appeal to popularity, and repetition for example. They used these tools very effectively to persuade a large crowd and audience. Their campaign that included this commercial was all in all very effective and
The audience will see this and feel as if these people are credible and reliable enough to follow their footsteps. Even though Pepsi is using the techniques well, the usage of metaphors in this advertisement is where it goes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepsi Pepsi is a carbonated soft drink that is produced and manufactured by PepsiCo. Created and developed in 1893 and introduced as Brad's Drink, it was renamed as Pepsi-Cola on August 28, 1898, then to Pepsi in 1961, and in select areas of North America, "Pepsi-Cola Made with Real Sugar" as of 2014. Caleb Bradham made Pepsi at his drugstore where the drink was sold. The name Pepsi was chosen after the digestive enzyme pepsin ( an enzyme that break down foods) and kola nuts used in the recipe. Bradham sought to create a fountain drink that was appealing and would aid in digestion and boost energy. The commercial displays high paid professional soccer players who were sponsored by Pepsi and used Pepsi as their source of drink and energy. Basically giving the idea that Pepsi is for real winners. The Sumo wrestlers had one thing in mind and that is to drink this powerful drink. So they went ahead and played for the drink. Apparently, the Sumo wrestlers ended up winning which symbolizes that the thirst for Pepsi brings the best out of people.
This is the final way that ads use to influence audiences to buy their product over another. The Pepsi ad provides a website that onlookers may visit if they wish to learn more about the “Pepsi Refresh Project.” By citing this website the ad has appealed to audience’s logical reasoning. However, unlike the Pepsi ad, the coke ad provides its fact on the advertisement. The ad informs readers that coca cola has been around for over 84 years. This is a better way to appeal to a person logical understanding, because the information is right there, and they do not have to go to a website to find information about the product. Overall, both advertisements provide information about their product in an attempt to persuade audiences to buy either Pepsi or Coca
This advertisement makes Diet Coke popular because it focuses on why the consumers drink the product; it 's refreshing and does not cause weight gain. This is proved in the advertisement because the women portrayed are happy and having a good time while sharing a Diet Coke, which leads the consumers to believe that they should buy a Diet Coke as well. This association increases sales and helps improve the overall market
Pepsi Company (PepsiCo) owns many brands of beverages, snacks and other foods. Its major product, Pepsi Cola, is one of the most popular carbonated beverages. Besides that, PepsiCo owns the brands Quaker Oats, Gatorade, Frito-Lay, Tropicana, Mountain Dew, Naked, Mirinda and SoBe. In order to maintain, or preferable expand, its market share, PepsiCo constantly introduced new products under its brands. This is a marketing strategy known as Product Development. By modifying the formulas and ingredients, PepsiCo had invented and marketed more than 50 types of carbonated beverages under the brand of Pepsi. To name a few, Pepsi Free introduced in 1982, Pepsi AM introduced in 1989, Pepsi Tropical introduced in 1994, Pepsi Blue introduced in 2003, Pepsi Edge introduce in 2004, Pepsi Lime introduced in 2005, and Pepsi Ice introduced in 2007. Some of the products survive and being accepted by consumers, however large number of the new formula Pepsi had failed and been removed from the market shelves in as short as 6 months.
April 13th 1992, PepsiCo introduced an exciting change to its popular Pepsi product in the test cities of Providence, Denver, and Dallas and called it Crystal Pepsi. This is believed by many to have been one of the best ideas that PepsiCo had ever came out with, as they simply removed any and all coloring from Pepsi, creating a healthier and visually stimulating product. During the 1980's, Madison Avenue advertisers created one of our society’s most aberrant spectacles yet, the pinnacle of decades of pop culture and advertising prowess, The Cola Wars. In our technological, media-driven, consumer-happy, and product-driven culture, selling and consuming soda has certainly become one of our biggest American pastimes. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo squared off for decades in various advertising coups trying to sell more soda to the already overly indulgent American public. A seemingly easy goal, but these companies have tried everything from using pop-stars, bold and daring challenges and most recently the chance to win a billion dollars on national television just for drinking their products. Throughout the 1990s, this trend continued. Among many new advertising campaigns, many soda companies tried introducing flashy new products that would catch as much media attention as possible. Crystal Pepsi sailed through the approval process. Focus groups loved the stuff, and test marketing was excellent. Crystal Pepsi went national in 1993 with a full scale media...
At the end of the day, they also want people to see that it's a good time when you drink Pepsi and projects this to their audience. This promotes an association with Pepsi and a good
Their advertising techniques set them apart as Coca-Cola still seems to market themselves as a “classic” company, and Pepsi seems to be more interested in modern methods market themselves. I am not discrediting anything that is classic, but as the world continues to grow and innovate we must move with it, if we continue to live in the past we will be left behind. Coca-Cola’s included image of Marilyn Monroe, a “classic” icon, and Pepsi’s included image of Beyoncé Knowles, a “modern” icon proves this point, which is why would Pepsi’s advertisement is more effective at attracting
According to Alexander Smith from NBC News, Pepsi stated, “ [they] were trying to project a global message of unity, peace and understanding.” Pepsi missed their mark with the ad and instead caused mayhem in the internet realm. They did not initially intend to make light of any serious issue such as the fight between African Americans and police officers or the Black Lives Matter movement, however that is how some may have interpreted it. News reporter Angela Watercutter from Wired mentioned Pepsi’s ‘Live for Now Moments Anthem’ and “its [overall] gist is to unite and [have people] ‘join the conversation’.” Most of the disagreement the ad had caused came from appropriated images from Black Lives Matter protest incorporated into the ad. For example, there are scenes in the ad that appear fairly similar to the images of the
Pepsi and Coca-Cola are both sodas, but they differ in terms of the satisfying flavors, the color and the graphic design that represents their two products, and then how Coke makes more money than Pepsi. With that said, you should have gotten the ideology of what we will go further in discussing about. Everybody loves these two very well-known sodas which can inject caffeine into you, which makes you all jittery in filling you up with an energetic energy. Alright, enough of this, let's go straight in-depth in talking about the two rivals throughout this paper of how Pepsi beats Coke in sales, but Coke is usually ahead when it comes to annual net income (Feigin) or how Pepsi is a sweeter brand compared to Coke, though Coke brand is more valuable