Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pepsi vs coca cola case studies
Rivalry between coca cola and pepsi
Rivalry between coca cola and pepsi
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Coca-Cola or Pepsi: Which Refreshes Your Thirst? There are a variety of beverages available to us today with a wide range of differences, some are flavored, carbonated, low calorie, energy boosters, and just plain water. When it comes down to carbonated drinks there are two major rivalry soda companies dominating the market. Coca Cola and Pepsi are two well know cola distributors with very credible history, but the question still remains one is America’s favorite? With the ongoing competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi, each company is incorporating new strategies for marketing and advertising there brands. When comparing an advertisement from each of the companies, we will review how they appeal to consumers. Branding and advertisement …show more content…
Pepsi was introduced in 1893 by Caleb Bradham as “Brads Drink” which then was renamed to “Pepsi Cola” in 1898. There wasn’t many options for advertising in this era due television not being introduced into households till the late 1900’s. One of the first Pepsi Cola advertisements was a black and while flyer that had a few characters laughing and read “Whoope!!! Zoom!! Drink Pepsi-Cola” at an advertisement from Pepsi, the have bright blue, red, and white colors that pop and are eye catching. Comparing this ad with a current ad and modern technology, you can see that Pepsi’s marketing and advertising techniques have come a long way. Reviewing a recent Pepsi advertisement, you can see that they have made groundbreaking changes to their branding techniques. First I will I will note that their choices in colors (red, blue, and white) for their brand are not only eye popping, but in a way symbolize the colors of America. I am not sure if this was their intent but it sure does standout. Next, there slogan in the ad states “Help Kick Off The Pepsi Super Bowl Halftime Show”, this ad targets a very large group people because its directly relating to one of the biggest sports event which is Super …show more content…
Their advertising techniques set them apart as Coca-Cola still seems to market themselves as a “classic” company, and Pepsi seems to be more interested in modern methods market themselves. I am not discrediting anything that is classic, but as the world continues to grow and innovate we must move with it, if we continue to live in the past we will be left behind. Coca-Cola’s included image of Marilyn Monroe, a “classic” icon, and Pepsi’s included image of Beyoncé Knowles, a “modern” icon proves this point, which is why would Pepsi’s advertisement is more effective at attracting
Main ideas: Taste, advertisement, Habits of Coke drinkers vs Pepsi drinkers. Organizational Pattern: Comparison and contrast Presentation Outline “Why you should drink Coke over Pepsi” Introduction: Attention-getter: When I was a younger I worked
Coke continuously out-stands Pepsi, even though they share a very similar taste and colour, however Coke should not be the drink that receives all the love and attention for what it offers. Despite their similar soda colour, the drinks actually contain some different ingredients, which produce a different taste, and affect the body differently. Furthermore, the way the companies markets their drinks makes a huge contribution to how successful their products will become. The major element for success however stems from their impact on society and how the companies utilize their social power to evolve. The two major soda companies are constantly head to head with one another, yet it is what they do that sets them apart.
First, both ads are biased and, they both contain vocabulary that is easy to understand. However, the Pepsi ad attempts to make consumers feel sympathy, whereas the Coca-Cola ad wants onlookers to feel relief. The blue background of the Pepsi ad helps create a calm feeling, whereas the white background on the Coke ad helps create the feeling of relief. Finally, both ads use different ways to appeal to people’s logical understanding. First, the Pepsi ad uses a website to provide facts on the advertisement that consumers can visit, if they wish.
We researched Coke and Pepsi as was requested to see which one would be a better
This ad does a very good job of accomplishing PepsiCo’s brand communications strategy. It is exciting and exhilarating and shows the personality traits of fun, irreverence and daring.
Brand Image / Loyalty: Coke and Pepsi have a long history of heavy advertising and this has earned them huge amount of...
The Porter’s model of competitive advantage of nations is based on four key elements including factor endowments, demand conditions, related and supporting industries and firm strategy, structure and rivalry. This makes it suitable in understanding the competition existing in the soft drinks industry in the Asian markets. The factor conditions identify the natural resources, climate, location, and demographics. Coca cola and Pepsi enjoy the growing population in the Asian markets (Yoffie, 2002). A higher population guarantees the two companies adequate revenues. Other factors include communication infrastructure and availability of skilled workers. Most of the Asian countries are embracing new technologies that grow much knowledge of the diverse beverage drinks. Secondly, the demand conditions play a significant role in enhancing competitiveness for the firms. Both Coca cola and Pepsi are an
1975 heralded the Pepsi Challenge', a landmark marketing strategy, which convinced millions of consumers that the taste of Pepsi was superior to Coke. Simultaneously, Pepsi Light, with a distinctive lemon taste, was introduced as an alternative to traditional diet colas. In 1983 Coke launched aspartame/saccharin blend Diet Coke. In response in 1989 Pepsi-Cola introduced an exciting new flavor, Wild Cherry Pepsi. Thus Diet Pepsi's 'The Other Challenge' campaign was based around a 54-46% lead over Diet Coke in independently researched taste tests in Australia. It was only in 1996 that Pepsi unveiled a revolutionary 'blue' look worldwide 'to transform the image and attitude' of one of the world's best-known brands. 'Pepsi Blue represents a quantum leap into the future and redefines how the Cola Wars will be fought and won in the 21st Century.'
The purpose of this report is to compare financial reports from the two largest soft drink manufacturers in the world. The Pepsi Co. and Coca Cola have been the industry's leaders in their market since the early 1900's. I will use relevant figures to determine profitability, and break down key ratios in profitability, liquidity, and solvency. By breaking down financial statements, and converting them to percentages and ratios, comparisons can be made between competitors regardless of size.
According to Tom Pirko, who runs a beverage consulting company in Los Angeles called Bev Mark, figured that there are two reasons Pepsi decided to bring out this Crystal Pepsi product (Pepsi Product ‘Crystal Pepsi’ is Clear, 1992). The first reason was due to competition with Coca-Cola whereby this new idea was intended to obtain a great deal of attention from the market. PepsiCo has been head-to-head positioning with Coca-Cola for many years and thus, they were considering differentiation positioning to expand their business.
The traditional view of Pepsi is a sugary, fattening soda. In order to combat this negative connotation, Pepsi introduced Diet Pepsi to the public in 1964. Diet Pepsi is no calorie, no carbohydrate, no sugar carbonated cola soft drink, the first of it’s kinda. In order to obtain the famous “0 cals, carb, sugar” slogan on the front of the slim can, alternative sweeter substitute the sugars found in regular Pepsi. The idea of Diet Pepsi not containing any of the three sins to a dieting women made them an easy target for advertising. An unhealthy product that has the same calories, carbohydrates, and sugars as water, is the perfect product for the health conscious society we live in. Not only did Pepsi change its product to contain fewer
Both brands are very much liked by Americans, and have been for a long time. Though they are competing, each product helps the other one out be more successful. The main point in both ads is to make the audience feel good and excited about purchasing, either Pepsi or Coca Cola. If both ads used more use of logos, this could help the product look more efficient, and make the consumer feel even better about purchasing whichever. Both Pepsi and Coca Cola companies assume the audience like the exciting feeling they get when seeing or watching the advertisement.
On January 24th, 1987, Pepsi managed to catch the King of Pop’s hair on fire, leaving him with burn wounds and scars for the rest of his life. On April 4th, 2017, Pepsi lit fire to its own proverbial hair with the release of its “Live for Now” ad, leaving the company scarred and burned for months to come. The problems with the ad stem from its abrasive use of their key three colors, the use of Kendall Jenner as the leader of a racially charged protest, and the trivialization of protests themselves. Based on this ad alone, Pepsi seems to only know three colors: red, white, and, of course, blue.
With that it is clear that the need for dominance surely is not the only thing Pepsi uses in its ads, so what else is there? A need that goes right along with dominance would be the need for affiliation. As a Pepsi drinker this ad appeals to the need for affiliation according to Jib fowles as “the need to adhere and remain loyal to a friend” (page 79). If Pepsi has been inside your house for as long as you can remember this ad reminds you that a switch now would be a betrayal. Pepsi knows its fans are incredibly loyal as is Coke’s. However there is a market that waivers from side to side not fully committed to either. This ad attacks that group with the need for affiliation. Humans often want to be on the winning side or be with the majority and this ad clearly shows Pepsi as the better product. Jon Russel of The next web states that “Advertising that directly mentions a competitor is always a bit risky but this daring creation… is pure genius”. Using another company’s brand invites a rebuttal but at the same time it shows Pepsi has no fear from Coke as it ran the ad knowing
Pepsi and Coca-Cola are both sodas, but they differ in terms of the satisfying flavors, the color and the graphic design that represents their two products, and then how Coke makes more money than Pepsi. With that said, you should have gotten the ideology of what we will go further in discussing about. Everybody loves these two very well-known sodas which can inject caffeine into you, which makes you all jittery in filling you up with an energetic energy. Alright, enough of this, let's go straight in-depth in talking about the two rivals throughout this paper of how Pepsi beats Coke in sales, but Coke is usually ahead when it comes to annual net income (Feigin) or how Pepsi is a sweeter brand compared to Coke, though Coke brand is more valuable