The Legislative And Executive Functions Of The Judicial Process

1314 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The role of the supreme court in us

Judicial Functions The judicial process basically involves a series on intertwined roles and procedures for resolving disputes through an authoritative individual or people whose decisions tend to be obeyed on a regular basis. The judicial process or functions also involve the use of administrative agencies, which were created to help the government in enacting the law in a simpler and more direct way than the legislature. Given the nature of their functions, administrative agencies do not necessarily adhere to the civil procedure established for courts and employ less formal means of pursuing their actions. However, there are various concepts and processes of administrative agency judicial functions in relation to different components …show more content…

One of the most commonly used means is the establishment of oversight committees that can force agency officials to explain their activities to them. Budgetary actions and legislative investigations are the other means of oversight in relation to the legislative and executive functions of these agencies. In relation to budgetary actions, the Congress ensures oversight of the legislative and executive functions of administrative agencies through determining the budget and appropriation of money for the various agencies. The allocation of funds determines the kind of work to be conducted and programs to be implemented by the administrative agency. In this case, the Congress may not provide funds for activities it does not like or necessitate expenditure on projects it like. With regards to legislative investigations, the President can issue executive orders that limit the powers of these agencies or result in commencement of investigations. Moreover, the Congress can repeal an agency’s enabling stature or modify legislation to force the agency to adhere to its wishes. Therefore, constitutional directives for legislative and executive actions are geared towards repealing an agency’s enabling statute while statutory directives focus on modifying an agency’s enabling legislation. Appointments to these agencies are political appointees by the President subject to the advice and consent of the Senate, which also play a crucial role in removal of such

Show More
Related

  • Rulemaking by Cornelius Kerwin

    973 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Cornelius Kerwin, "Rulemaking is the single most important function performed by agencies of government…Rulemaking refines, and in some instances defines, the mission of every government agency. In so doing it provides direction and content from budgeting, program implementation, procurement, personnel management, dispute resolution, and other important government activities" (Preface XI). This is the foundation for the book, Rulemaking. The whole text primarily revolves around this statement. Throughout the book Kerwin's central theme is that rulemaking is the single most important function that any government agency has within its possession. Much like other admin law books he discusses how those agencies with their rulemaking powers interpret legislation and proceed forward with making policy.

    Read More

  • Factors Affecting Congressional Oversight

    1787 Words  | 4 Pages

    Monitoring and sanctions are the more costly of oversight functions and the least likely to be used; they also do not ensure that the noncompliance problem will end. (McCubbins, Noll and Weingast 1987) This follows with McCubbins and Schwartz who theorize that members of congress do not neglect monitoring and their oversight functions but that they prefer the fire-alarm policing in which citizens tend to alert them to problems because it allows them to also do their legislative work (1984). Monitoring along with its economic costs also has political costs if an action that an agency takes in its noncompliance creates a new political interest then by sanctioning them members can incur political costs that would not have otherwise been present with proper anticipation and prevention. (McCubbins, Noll and Weingast 1987) Anticipatory prevention of noncompliance is a form of latent control that congress can exercise that is more effective; Calvert, McCubbins and Weingast develop a theory that includes this finding, “Latent oversight is, by definition, never observed; but its role in implementing political control over the agency is in principle just as important as that of active control (Calvert, McCubbins and Weingast, 1989).” This often occurs when the agent fears sanction in the case of this theory developed the veto, this point would

    Read More

  • Procedural Fairness: Baker Vs. Canada

    1244 Words  | 3 Pages

    Administrative law pertains to the process involved with making a decision, rather than the content of the decision itself. Fair process is at the heart of administrative law, and is present in all the branches flowing from it.

    Read More

  • Congressional Oversight in American Politics

    1286 Words  | 3 Pages

    As ordered by the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, Congress was given the power to “exercise continuous watchfulness” over the executive branch and its subsidiary agencies and programs. The Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 went one step further in granting oversight powers to Congress by authorizing House and Senate committees to “review and study, on a continuing basis the application, administration and execution” of laws.

    Read More

  • The Role of Courts in American Politics

    426 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Role of Courts in American Politics The third branch of the federal government is the judicial branch. Before the existence of the Constitution, a system of state courts was in place. Through much controversy and compromise a decision was accomplished, which put in place the Supreme Court. In Article III, Section 1, "The judicial power of the United Statesshall be vested in one Supreme Court and such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." The Supreme Court was initially set up as a part of the separation of powers in the American political system.

    Read More

  • Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker

    829 Words  | 2 Pages

    The significant impact Robert Dahl’s article, “Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker” created for our thought on the Supreme Court it that it thoroughly paved the way towards exemplifying the relationship between public opinion and the United States Supreme Court. Dahl significantly was able to provide linkages between the Supreme Court and the environment that surrounds it in order for others to better understand the fundamental aspects that link the two together and explore possible reasoning and potential outcomes of the Court.

    Read More

  • The Power of Judicial Review

    1111 Words  | 3 Pages

    The late 1700s and early 1800s were a time full of expansion and innovation in the United States of America. The country was getting bigger, both in population and in geographic size, and the government was getting more powerful as well. This was because of the new Constitution that was put into place in 1787 that replaced the Articles of Confederation and took most of the power away from the individual states and gave it to the federal government. When the Constitution was ratified, both Brutus (believed to be Robert Yates), and Alexander Hamilton were in a debate over the potential power of the federal government, and more specifically, the power of the Supreme Court in Federalist 78 and Brutus’ eleventh and twelfth letters. Alexander Hamilton supported the proposed system and expressed his belief that the judiciary did not have too much power by any means. Brutus was more concerned that the court would simply side with the government and would therefore have too much power over the states. In 1803 one of the biggest landmark cases ever reached the Court, Marbury v. Madison. This case was not directly about the power of the court, but similar to most Supreme Court cases, it turned into a debate about something more crucial. By reading John Marshall’s opinion on the Marbury v. Madison case, it is apparent that Brutus originally had the better idea about the Supreme Court’s power due to his overwhelming wisdom and excellent foresight into what the judiciary would eventually become.

    Read More

  • The Federal Bureaucracy In The Federal Government

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federal Bureaucracy is comprised of nearly every department, committee, and agency that makes up the Federal Government. The function of the bureaucracy is to implement laws and policies, define the rules and regulations of how a law works, and institute examinations, permits and licenses. Congress makes the laws and policies in a broad manner and the bureaucrats flesh out the details and minutia of the intent of that law’s maker. The bureaucrats of the specific department etc. may be appointed officials, civil service employees or other federal employees. The persons are typically specialized in a specific field that relates to the committee’s duties and responsibilities and possess more knowledge than the lawmakers, which allows policies

    Read More

  • Criminal Law Basics

    1136 Words  | 3 Pages

    Administrative law – body of law that consists of creating and establishing administration agencies. Rules, responsibilities, regulations, and the powers used by these agencies are also developed under this law. Agencies such as the Social Security Administration and Welfare Commissions are two agencies included in this law. Usually, the creations of these agencies were made to provide their applicants with benefits. (School, Administrative Law)

    Read More

  • Judiciary as the Most Powerful Branch of Government

    2619 Words  | 6 Pages

    Judiciary as the Most Powerful Branch of Government In answering this question I will first paint a picture of the power that the court holds, and decide whether this is governmental power. Then I will outline the balances that the court must maintain in its decision making and therefore the checks on its actions as an institution that governs America. "Scarcely any political question arises that is not resolved sooner or later into a judicial question." (Alexis de Tocqueville Democracy in America) If we take Tocqueville on his word then the American Judiciary truly is in a powerful position.

    Read More

  • Ombudsman Reform

    2040 Words  | 5 Pages

    The term administrative justice refers to an overall system of specialised bodies that attempt to resolve disputes and complaints made between members of the public and public bodies, such as, the NHS, UK government departments and public organisations like the DVLA, the job centre and the home office. These specialised bodies and systems range from appeal tribunals to parliamentary and health service ombudsman and judicial review, which all work as ways to challenge and seek redress from official decisions made by said public bodies . Though the administrative justice system, particularly the ombudsman service,

    Read More

  • Judicial Review

    689 Words  | 2 Pages

    The debate over the legitimacy of the role of judicial review in the United States constitutional democracy has been around since the creation of the Constitution. The power of judicial review can be considered antidemocratic because it isn’t directly stated in the Constitution, of the authority of unelected judges and the fact that it sometimes resists the majority. Despite these claims, I believe judicial review is a constitutional doctrine, which arose from the historical process of persuasive reasoning in rulings, institutional prestige, the cooperation of political branches, and general public opinion.

    Read More

  • Goodnow Politics And Administration

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    Frank J. Goodnow’s “Politics and Administration,” infers that politics and administration cannot be divided and are in need of each other to function. However, politics are superior to administration. Goodnow’s further analyzes and identifies three forms of authorities that enforce and implements states will. The first responsibility of authority is to respect the right of the people when conflicts ascend between either private or public matters. The second is judicial authorities also referred to as executive authorities that ensure the needs and policies of the state are executed. The third authority also referred to as “administrative authorities,” focuses on the mechanical, scientific and business authorities pertaining to the government.

    Read More

  • Essay On Congress Power

    1409 Words  | 3 Pages

    To begin with, some congressional powers that are listed on Article 1 of the Constitution include the powers to “initiate legislation, oversight, override presidential vetoes, structure judicial jurisdiction, override the judiciary, and approve senior presidential appointments” (Module 7 Lecture 2). Another congressional power is “the power of impeachment over the president, vice president, top executive branch officials, and judicial officials” (Ginsberg et. al. 2017: 303).The congressional power to initiate legislation is the power to control the “spending of government money” (Module 7 Lecture 2).

    Read More

  • Essay On Judicial Review

    2166 Words  | 5 Pages

    Judicial review seeks to enforce and uphold constitutional doctrines which govern the UK’s uncodified constitution by scrutinising administrative action. One constitutional function of judicial review is to enforce the rule of law. It can be argued, in defining the rule of law as “negative value...designed to minimised the harm to freedom and dignity which the law may cause in its pursuit of its goals” Joseph Raz characterised judicial review. The principle of which states the executive is to be ruled by the law and subject to it.

    Read More

More about The Legislative And Executive Functions Of The Judicial Process

Open Document