The Importance Of The Supreme Court

760 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Supreme court cases civics quiz

The Supreme Court is essential to the United States government, even more so, the judicial branch. The Supreme Court aids in protecting the Constitution of the United States, and as a result, protects the American people’s liberties. From 1789 to now, United States Presidents have appointed the Justices of the Supreme Court. Since 1869, there have been only nine Justices; one Chief Justice, and eight Associate Justices, all which have the responsibility of reviewing and discussing the cases appealed to the Supreme Court. Serving now as the Chief Justice is John Robert, who started as an Associate Justice for 2 years before selected as Chief Justice, the position he has held for 9 years. Associate Justices include Antonin Scalia of 28 years; Anthony Kennedy of 27 years; Clarence Thomas of 23 years; Ruth Bader Ginsburg of 21 years; Stephen Breyer of 21 years; Samuel Alito of 9 years; Sonia Sotomayor of 6 years; and Elena Kagan of 5 years (http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx). …show more content…

According to the duties found under the works of Article III, the judicial branch deals with defining laws and protecting the Constitution. Section 1 of Article III creates the Supreme Court, “The Judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court”. The Supreme Court is the paramount court, its role in the government is to take the appeals from the subordinate courts who are hoping to overturn the court’s decision, and construe and resolve any confusion of laws regarding the Constitution

Show More
Related

  • John Marshall's Effect on the American Judicial System

    1672 Words  | 4 Pages

    The judicial power, also known back then as The Weakest Branch, was created to achieve an effective collaboration of the powers, what we call now Check and Balances. One of the framers of the Judicial Power was John Marshall. Chief Justice John Marshall is one of the main figures in the history of the US Judicial System. He was the youngest Chief Justices in the history of the United States and was the developer of the most important power of the Supreme Court, The Judicial Review.

    Read More

  • Power Of Judicial Review: Miranda V. Arizona

    1014 Words  | 3 Pages

    The court determines whether on not an action is constitutional or not through the process of judicial review. Not only do they keep the Legislative and Executive branch in line, they keep other courts in line. Many and very few cases require the Supreme Court to review and overturn decision. Example are the Miranda v. Arizona cases where the police was in the wrong by violating Miranda’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment therefore ruling in Miranda’s favor. Also the Weeks v. United States case was an example of the Fourth and Fifth Amendment being violated was again ruling in the defendent’s favour. Finally, the Plessey v. Furguson case was a little different really displaying the courts power to interpret laws and ruling in the prosecuter’s favour. The Judicial Branch is certainly not the weakest branch and has a more important role than many people

    Read More

  • Legislative Branch Speech Outline

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. The judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court and other various courts system at the federal, state, and local level. As I mentioned before the Supreme Court Justices are nominated the President of the United States, but the Senate must also approve them with at least 51 out of the 100 possible votes (“Branches of Government”). There is no specific term length of a Supreme Court Justice, once appointed, they will have that position for life or until they decide to retire.

    Read More

  • Power of the Branches

    1126 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Judiciary Branch offers checks and balances to the other branches of government. To both the Legislative and Executive branches, the Judicial Branch holds the power of judicial review. The Judicial branch can also declare existing laws as unconstitutional.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Judicial Review

    1015 Words  | 3 Pages

    is one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the United States. Many

    Read More

  • Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker

    829 Words  | 2 Pages

    The significant impact Robert Dahl’s article, “Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker” created for our thought on the Supreme Court it that it thoroughly paved the way towards exemplifying the relationship between public opinion and the United States Supreme Court. Dahl significantly was able to provide linkages between the Supreme Court and the environment that surrounds it in order for others to better understand the fundamental aspects that link the two together and explore possible reasoning and potential outcomes of the Court.

    Read More

  • The Supreme Court

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    Presently the supreme court has nine members, which include one Chief Justice and eight associate Justices. The Chief Justice Appoints each associate Justice to oversee one or more various circuits. Every year the Supreme Court has a term in which it revues selected cases. This term starts on the first Monday of October and ends either in the end of June or the beginning of July. During this term the Justices review one-hundred out of 6,000 or so cases with no clear guidelines on which ones they must look at.

    Read More

  • The Two Eras that Made the Supreme Court the most Influential

    1301 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Marshall Court started in 1801. John Marshall was the fourth longest lasting Chief Justice of the United States. Marshall dominated the Court, and which played a significant role in the development of the American legal system. He brought back to the courts the notion that federal courts were able to use judicial review, only if they violated the Constitution. Thusly, John Marshall believed that the position of the American judiciary was a vital and significant branch of government. Furthermore, John Marshall's court made several important decisions in response to federalism, the power between federal government and state government. In particular, he repeatedly established and shared the authority of federal law over state law. Marshall supported the understanding and interpretation of the enumerated powers. President John Adams appointed John Marshall to the United States Supreme Court in 1798. John Marshall was also elected into the United States House of Representatives in 1799. In 180...

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Constitution

    1902 Words  | 4 Pages

    The legislative, executive, and judicial branches represent the constitutional infrastructure foreseen by the Founding Fathers for our nation 's governing body. Together, they work to maintain a system of lawmaking and administration based on checks and balances, and separation of powers intended to make certain that no individual or embodiment of government ever becomes too controlling. America is governed by a democratic government or a democracy which is a government by the people, in which the power is established in the people themselves. The people then elect representatives who carry out their power in a free electoral system. The United States government’s basic claim is to serve the people and only through a combined effort can we

    Read More

  • Marbury Vs. James Madison: The Most Important Case In Supreme Court History

    465 Words  | 1 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson had just become the U.S. President, so John Adams appointed a large amount of justices of peace which were approved by the Senate, signed by the president, and affixed with the official seal of the government. William Marbury was appointed a justice of the peace

    Read More

  • Hamilton's Arguments Against The Judicial Branch

    495 Words  | 1 Pages

    If laws were made and they didn’t follow the constitution, then America wouldn’t be America anymore. Therefore I believe that their role to protect the constitution is essestial to protect the country and also the people. They also have an appropriate amount of power over the legislative branch. If the legislature makes the laws that do not go according to the constitution, the judicial branch has the power to declare their acts unconstitutional. “Some perplexity respecting the rights of the courts to pronounce legislative acts void, because contrary to the Constitution, has arisen from an imagination that the doctrine would imply a superiority of the judiciary to the legislative power.” Futhermore, the judicial branch is there to make sure the constitution is followed ultimately so that the will of the people is considered and protected.

    Read More

  • Rise of Judicial Power: Constitution and Marbury v Madison

    1791 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was ratified in 1787 and it established the powers of the federal government. Its intended purpose was to protect individual rights and liberties. It constructed the three branches of government that we know today: Executive, legislative and judicial. These branches created a separation of powers, in addition to check and balances. Originally, the judicial branch did not have much power when the constitution was written. It was not until the case of Marbury v Madison in 1803 that it actually established the judicial review. The judicial review is what gave the federal courts a great deal of power to void acts of Congress that they deemed violates the Constitution. After this case, the Supreme Court Justices

    Read More

  • supreme court history

    807 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1789, the final draft of the constitution of the United States came into effect. In article three it calls for "[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." In the article it neither says the duties, powers, or any organization of the supreme court. If left this up to congress and to the justices of the court itself for these details.

    Read More

  • The Burger Court

    1476 Words  | 3 Pages

    Warren Earl Burger was born September 17th, 1907 in St. Paul, Minnesota. He was of Swiss and German ancestry and served as the 15th Chief Justice to the United States Supreme Court. After graduating from St. Paul College of Law in 1931, the lifelong republican held many various positions in the legal system while working his way to the top. Burger focused mainly in the areas of corporate law, real estate and probate law, while at the same time becoming involved in politics. Furthermore, he was involved in many successful campaigns which brought attention to himself by prominent republicans. His appointment to the U.S Court of Appeals quickly built his background as a law and order judge. Serving in the circuit courts for a mere thirteen years led to his appointment as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 1969 by President Richard M. Nixon. Once appointed Chief Justice, Burger presided over numerous cases, Burger’s goals as Chief Justice was to modernize and streamline the courts to make them more accessible and functional, along with originating the idea of employing professional court administrators, implementing continuing education for judges, and improving coordination between federal and state courts, in addition to being noted for his outspoken criticism of ill-prepared litigators who used the jobs as a way of on-the-job training (Facts, 1996). While serving in the Supreme Court, Justice Burger was involved in many important cases.

    Read More

  • The Supreme Court: The Power Of The Supreme Court

    1278 Words  | 3 Pages

    “If the Supreme Court rules a certain way, then it must be law.” Many Americans have this concept of the federal court system; they believe that the Supreme Court has immense power over all the court systems, yet that is far from the truth. In today’s society, the Supreme Court has the highest approval rating compared to all of the other branches of government. Now the question is what actions does the Supreme Court take that affect my life directly, for me to believe it that it has such great power? If the authority of the Supreme Court is studied under a magnify glass, then you will see that it is an abstract concept which derives from the support of the American population. This is the point, us Federalist, are trying to get people to understand.

    Read More

More about The Importance Of The Supreme Court

Open Document