Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Constitutional interpretation
Role of the supreme court
Supreme court cases quiz
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 1787 Article three of the constitution created the Supreme Court, but not until 1789 was it configured. The way it was originally set up was with one Chief Justice and five associate judges, with all six members being appointed for life. This court serves as the “supreme law of the land”, it has the power to determine if state or federal laws are in conflict with how the Court interprets the constitution. Presently the supreme court has nine members, which include one Chief Justice and eight associate Justices. The Chief Justice Appoints each associate Justice to oversee one or more various circuits. Every year the Supreme Court has a term in which it revues selected cases. This term starts on the first Monday of October and ends either in the end of June or the beginning of July. During this term the Justices review one-hundred out of 6,000 or so cases with no clear guidelines on which ones they must look at. There are two major ways that the Constitution is interpreted. One of which is called the “Strict Constitution” of national law, an example of this would be the “Dred Scott decision. The other way is the federalist position, where the Constitution grants broad power to the federal government. Two great examples of this type of interpretation were Chief Justices John Marshall and Earl Warren. During the years the Supreme Court has gone through some changes of its’ own. While Chief Justice Earl Warren was there the first African-American Justice was named to the court: Thurgood Marshall. Chief Justice Warren’s leadership marked a force in social issues. Along the lines of desegregation, election reform and the rights of defendants. Then in 1969 Warren Burger was named Chief Justice. That is when the Court started to lean more to the conservatives. By 1989 during William Rehnquists leadership, which runs from 1986 to the present, the conservatives held a majority on most issues. One other Major thing that happened to the Supreme Court in the 1980’s was the appointment of the first lady Justice: Sandra Day O’Connor. The present members of the Supreme Court are as follows: William Hubbs Rhenquist, Chief Justice: born 1924 in Wisconsin, graduated Stanford Law School. He was an assistant Attorney General from 1969 till 1971 when President Nixon appointed him to the Court. 1986 President Reagan appointed him Chief Jus... ... middle of paper ... ...y lasting long or having any sort of unity with that situation. The case that I chose to analyze is Reno v. ACLU. It is the first Internet related U.S. Supreme Court case ever to be decided. Seven of the justices found the argued provisions of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) were unconstitutional under the First Amendment. The court found that the Internet is similar to a shopping mall or library not a broadcast medium as the government refered to it. The majority opinion for this case was that the Internet is a unique marketplace for ideas. The ruling states that while there is a large amount of pornographic material out there, it normally isn’t come across on accident. They stated that the CDA already holds back a good amount of speech that is alright for adult to adult conversations, which they do have a constitutional right to receive. While they recognize the CDA efforts to protect children from harmful speech and pornographic material, it still does not justify the unnecessarily broad suspension of speech. The final outcome was that they found that what the CDA was trying to do would violate speakers messages who are rightfully protected under the First Amendment.
... eye. While Toobin gave me great insight to the people who make up the Supreme Court, this book has become dated in some aspects. Stevens and Souter no longer are a part of the Supreme Court. As this book shows, each individual Justice makes up the personality of Supreme Court, which is now sightly different, without Justices Stevens and Souter. The nine justices in the book served together longer than any other group of Justices. Toobin describes the how each of the Justices got appointed to the Supreme court, including the failed nominations that ultimately brought each of the Justices to the Supreme court. The Supreme Court shapes our country in ways that no other branch of government can, because they are appointed for life. Ultimately, nominating a Supreme Court Justics, is one of the most far reaching and lasting way a president can shape our nation.
On September 6th of 2005, President George Bush nominated John Roberts as the Chief of Justice of the United States which considered him to be the youngest Chief of Justice next to John Marshall at age 50. Since then, John Roberts has been serving his people in the supreme court by participating in many cases such as Roe vs. Wade, have been very controversial and regardless of which side he argues, will always leave some people
Whether you agree or disagree with Chief Justice Roberts’s jurisprudence, the fact that he is unique is undeniable. Not only does he hold the highest position in the legal world but he also has a number of non-judicial duties as well, such as leading the Judicial Conference of the United States, Chancellor of the Smithsonian Institution and most importantly administering the oat of office of at Presidential inaugurations. The presidential inauguration of 2009 marked Chief Justices first inauguration of a president. This was the first time a president was sworn in by a Chief Justice whose confirmation he opposed.
In the Crucible, we are introduced to the main protagonist John Proctor; the way that Arthur Miller presents him by rebelling against the authority in Salem. Out of the entire town he is the only person that speaks out, realising that the authority is unfair and unjust; he is not like everyone else in the town who keeps quiet to themselves. There are many situations where we the readers can see very clear examples of him rebelling against the authority that controlled Salem. One example of Proctor rebelling against authority in Salem was when he did not go to church on a Sabbath day and instead decided to pray in his own home ‘Mr Proctor, your house is not a church; your theology must tell you that’. That is one clear example of him rebelling
ruled by a similar group to that of our Supreme Court because, the members of
Before the adoption of the United States Constitution, the U.S. was governed by the Articles of Confederation. These articles stated that almost every function of the government was chartered by the legislature known as Congress. There was no distinction between legislative or executive powers. This was a major shortcoming in how the United States was governed as many leaders became dissatisfied with how the government was structured by the Articles of Confederation. They felt that the government was too weak to effectively deal with the upcoming challenges. In 1787, an agreement was made by delegates at the Constitutional Convention that a national judiciary needed to be established. This agreement became known as The Constitution of the United States, which explicitly granted certain powers to each of the three branches of the federal government, while reserving other powers exclusively to the states or to the people as individuals. It is, in its own words, “the supreme Law of the Land” (Shmoop Editorial Team).
In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, John Proctor plays a very significant and crucial role in many ways. John, being a man 33 years old, was a farmer who had married to Elizabeth and after their third baby, had an affair with Abigail after she was hired as a housemaid. Throughout the story, John showed dramatic emotional and personal courage, uses irony, imagery, foreshadowing and symbolism to show his sins, guilt, confrontation, love and adherence. Proctor shows hatred for hypocrites, especially Reverend Parris, and after committing adultery; he becomes one of his own. Proctor shows a desperate need and want for forgiveness throughout The Crucible and in all reality; John needs to forgive himself just as Abigail says in the book. As well as
Proctor knows he is not going to Heaven because of his past sins. Proctor believes nothing can change by telling one more lie: “Nothing’s spoiled by giving them this lie that were not rotten long before” (126). Proctors fate is sealed when he had the affair. There is no chance at being saved because once someone tells a lie, they are going to go to Hell according to Puritan belief. Knowing that he can never go to Heaven, Proctor would rather live his life with the town believing he is a witch than say he isn't a witch and die now. Even though Proctor has no hope for his future, he does not want to hurt the future for others. All the others condemned are good people and do not deserve to have their goodness taken away from them: “They think to go like saints. I like not to spoil their names” (130). Proctor does not have the power to seal others fate. He can only speak about himself and whether he is a witch or not. He cannot tell a lie for himself which also tells a lie about others. By lying about the others, he will change how the town views them. If the town believes the others are witches, then their families cannot live peacefully. Proctor wants them to be able to go out with their names intact. He feels hopeless about his own fate but can only decide his fate, not
The Constitution or “the supreme law of the land”, as stated in article six in the constitution is very complex. It is complex not only in its actual text full of ambiguities and vagueness, but it becomes more complex when used in practice and interpreted. Constitutional interpretation is significant because it is what decides what the constitution actually means. Constitutional interpretation is a guide judges use to find the legal meaning of the constitution. The interpretation of the constitution and amendments can make a big impact on outcomes. In our government and Judiciary, we see commonly see originalism being used to interpret the constitution and amendments, but there
2). As with informal assessment, I feel that this is more flexible and can depend on students’ response to activity, lesson, or content. This can be a faster way for the teacher to see results of the students work. Some students prefer a more planned out way of testing them where the questions are written, and they have an idea of how the assessment is planned out and taking place. Other students like anything but written, long exams and would prefer to be evaluated in other ways. I feel that in my future classroom I will vary my type of instruction and allow for all the different types of unique learners to be assessed in a variety of different ways.
Combining long hours, difficult patients, bad outcomes, death, and a fast work pace, both a physician’s physical and mental state can become worn down. Similarly, Gregor in “the Metamorphosis” works tirelessly with hardly any down time to provide for his family, being the sole breadwinner. At first, Gregor is very shy of his transformation, and does not want his family or boss to see him in his comprised state, showing his fear of weakness and vulnerability. Although he recognizes that he is physically exhausted, he still intends to go to work on the morning of his transformation. He clings to the concept of self-sufficiency as he continues to try and live his life normally. Initially, he refuses to accept his transformation. He struggles all morning trying to do things for him self. This failure to accept change and realize the need for help parallels many physicians struggling with mental illness. Physicians are stereotyped as strong and intelligent with the ability to handle it all. This leads many in the face of mental illness to try and move past it or learn to handle it on their own. In addition, physicians are required in many states to report any mental diagnosis to the medical licensing board. This leads many physicians to fear seeking help for depression or anxiety, which may lead to restrictions in their medial license. (>>>) (CLOSING
‘Design thinking’ stands for Design-Specific Cognitive activities that many designers apply during the process of their designing and outline of designing, this is what design thinking stands for and compromises of many factors. For example, design is the creation of a plan or convention for the construction of an object or a system which includes: within architectural blueprints, engineering drawings, business processes, circuit diagrams and sewing patterns to name a few. Some examples of these design principles include Applied arts, Architecture, Benchmarking design, Communication design, Engineering design, Fashion design, Game design, Graphic design, Information Architecture, Industrial design, Instructional design, Interaction design, Interior design, Landscape architecture, Lighting design, Military Design , Multimedia design, Product design, Process design, Service design, Software design, Sound design, Transition Design, Urban design, Visual design and Web Design. Throughout this essay I will firstly be discussing the meaning and different aspects of social change, followed by influencing social change through design then the influence of social change on design and lastly I will be concluding this essay with my final answer to the question.
The Supreme Court is a very powerful part of the government. Because the Supreme Court is the highest federal court in the United States, they alone decide the meaning of the constitution. The Supreme Court has nine justices that decide the constitutionality of cases that petition them.The Supreme Court gets their power through “judicial review” which is the act of declaring IF a law or act of another branch is constitutional or not. The supreme court has had the power of judicial review since the case of Marbury v Madison. The power of judicial review came from the Supreme Court itself in a case called Marbury v Madison. Marbury v Madison gave the Supreme Court the power to void an act of Congress if it is inconsistent with the Constitution.
Designers can have very influential impacts on people in the design field or not. Some may not know it or understand it, which makes design more successful in the real world. The profession of a designer can be hectic or turbulent one. They want to know what’s going on in the world all the times but each designer sees it differently, which helps design evolve. Designers know how to ask the right questions and go above and beyond to come up with new questions and new ways of look at things. In the end, this is what is essential in developing new design in society.
The phrase "what is design" has been contemplated constantly. Walking down the street, people see cars, buildings and advertisements; piece of artwork serving purposes in the daily lives. Throughout society, people are bombarded by a verity of designs captivating the users and manifesting itself within cultural space. It is a broad definition and this may be due to the existence of art, with the two forms sharing such similarities yet different quite distinctly. Designers create to capture users attention, but ‘what is design?’ When the term ‘design’ comes to mind, it could be difficult to define and is often misconstrue as a term for art, however they have two entirely different meanings.