Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral judgement and decision making
Are school dress codes harmful or beneficial
Is it necessary to enforce dress code and rules in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Moral judgement and decision making
Moral choices happen every day, whether we think about them or not. When I pick up a coffee and drink, I make the moral choice to indulge myself, rather than help someone who needs it. However, a prominent moral choice that I made, that I can dissect and expound upon, would go all the way back to my high school years. It was my sophomore year. I went to a small Christian academy with about five other high school students, and about ten primary education students. The school had a very strict guideline, and students were to maintain them if they wished to continue at the school, (it was a traditional Baptist school). For example on every Wednesday, we had to wear dress pants, dress shirt, dress shoes, ties, etc; and this is only a brief description of the dress code policy, which was probably the most lenient policy they had. Being in a Christian school didn’t mean any of us were Christian. Although I did at the time identify as one, there were also atheists and other religious beliefs held among the kids. Interestingly, I had become a close friend with the most troubled of the lot, and we had got into plenty of mischief on our own. During our high school lunch breaks, if it was nice out, we were allowed to get some fresh air, shoot some hoops and what not …show more content…
In reference to myself, if I had told the school, then I could have been considered a means to an end, in order to acquire illusive information about other students. If the teachers found out, they could have used the actions of the students, to enforce even stricter rules, making them another means. The practical imperative, in the situation, creates a paradoxical situation in Kantian ethics. It may be wrong to not tell the teachers or to lie according to the categorical imperative, however it is also wrong in how the school would have used the others and myself under practical
Sneaking religion into public school is becoming an uncomfortable dispute for students. Last year at my public high school we had a couple encounters with this dilemma. A Christian group called young life was to make an appearance. There were flyers around the halls advertising free pizza and ice cream at lunch time if we came to the meeting. Representatives came the lunch period the day before to walk around and promote the meeting. I did not know anything about the group, but there was free pizza so of course I went with a couple of friends. They put on a small video presentation about the group. At the beginning, it showed kids traveling to different camps and having lots of fun. About halfway through the video, it showed the kids praying and it started to talk about Christianity. I had no problem with this except for the fact that I had tricked into coming to this meeting. My friend turned to me and said, “Wait, is this a bible group”. I rea...
Having an abortion is a moral choice. The essay “A Moral Choice” by Mary Gordan discusses many issues concerning abortion, the author clearly favors pro-choice. The debate about when a fetus is alive (437) is a concern as to when it is acceptable to get an abortion. As well as the morality of abortion judged in the media, religion, society, and by self. The women who get abortions are critiqued as cold and technological (441). These normal everyday women have made this moral decision for centuries. Although society needs to be realistic our world is over populated and some women are not designed to have children. How do women make this moral decision?
In the nonfiction novel Into Thin Air by Jon Krakauer, morality is a prominent theme of the tragedy. This novel tells of the 1996 Mount Everest disaster from the first person perspective of Krakauer, a surviving climber. Especially on the mountain, morality is often posed as a question of life or death. For example, in chapter 17, Krakauer writes, “.....he turned to see Harris - who must have been seriously debilitated, if his condition when I’d seen him on the South Summit two hours earlier was any indication - plodding slowly up the summit ridge to assist Hall and Hansen”. This line explains the death of Andy Harris, a character who sacrifices himself in a futile attempt to bring oxygen to his team’s head guide, Hall, and to another climber,
by the natural laws of the universe. Hard determinism claims that not only is determinism true,
Difficult choosing discloses people’s inherited characteristics. The main problem is that society tries to burden us with its ow list of morally good/bad choices. But, every human has its own compass which tells what is morally good/bad, and which situations requires them to make a reasonable decision. So, we can uncover our ability for moral commitment.
Some of the deficiencies in the way cultural relativism addresses moral problems, according to Holmes; are that they remain impractical, they are subject to change depending on where you live, and that people tolerate the different cultures. As a professional business person, I agree with Holmes analysis. Allowing others perceptions or beliefs to get away with our own personal beliefs would be contradicting ourselves. It is important to stand up for our beliefs, and help educate others on ethical issues. Over time we can make a difference in the world by modeling moral beliefs and ethics.
Ferrel and Gardiner (1991) say there are two criteria to ethical choices on top of being legal. The first being; “One does not infringe on the basic inalienable human rights – such as life, freedom of speech and privacy, due process – recognized by our society (ethical formalism).” Basically stating the respect of others should be considered in all decisions. The second states each person should strive towards an increase in self-esteem and mental health. Maintaining self-respect should be thought of in the decision making process.
Is Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus a useful but not a definite process for moral decision making
The professor first must identify a possible maxim of the situation, or the rule of thumb, for the first formulation. The professor’s maxim for this dilemma is to not report his plagiarism to school. If everyone followed that maxim, the professor could still do this. Regardless, it’s not desirable to live in a world where everyone followed said maxim. Then, analyze the maxim with the second formulation, which asks if a moral agent is used as a means in this decision. The professor is being used as a means by the student to avoid the consequences of plagiarism. As a result, this maxim is morally wrong according to Kant. However, there is another possible maxim the professor can follow, which is to tell the truth to the administration and report Charlie for plagiarism. One can conclude with the first formulation that this maxim can still be used if everyone did it and that a world where everyone followed this maxim is desirable. The second formulation also states that this maxim does not use anyone as a means to reach and end. Therefore, the latter maxim is a morally right action according to Kant. With the categorical imperative, the professor can conclude that the Kantian decision is to tell the truth and report the
A good life worth living in my opinion requires serving and meeting the needs of others, as well as myself. We are expected to give unselfishly to our associates, friends, neighbors and family for good moral cause because it is purposeful in the end. What would we reap from merely relying on our sole actions and how would that selfishness benefit us as a whole in society? This is where Kant and Nietzsche disagree on the definition of what is considered a good life, what is considered moral and who has the worth to decide upon it.
There are universal moral principles that are right for all individual at all times. Children are taught about moral values very early on, which will help them as they get older. Although, some people make mistakes and don’t always do what is morally right, moral principles are there to keep people in the right tract. People know that when they do something morally wrong consequences usually follow. According to James Rachels, who is a descriptive soft universalist, states that there are at least three universal values. “One: a policy of caring for enough infants to ensure the continuation of the group, two: a rule against lying, three: a rule against murder.” (Rosenstand, 2013, p. 142). According to Nina Rosenstand, people may disagree that
“Different cultures have different moral codes”, James Rachels discusses in his article Why Morality Is Not Relative? (Rachels, p. 160). A moral code is a set of rules that is considered to be the right behavior that may be accepted by a group of individuals within a society. Each culture tends to have their own individual standards and moral codes. Moral codes are guidelines laid out by a cultures ancestors. Standards are guidelines set forth by the individual themselves. Standards and morals don’t always have to be the same, but there are instances where they are. The moral codes claim what is “right” and what is “wrong”. Moral codes outline what behaviors individuals are supposed to make. These codes are basically laws, but specifically
et al. 1989 as cited by Psychology 216, 2009). From this, the moral reasoning theory was developed based on the thinking of the University of Harvard Profession Lawrence Kohlberg and inspired by renowned philosophers Jean Piaget, John Dewey and James Baldwin Barger, 2000). It suggests that forms of aggression is related to the stage of moral reasoning or ethics amongst athletes who respect reward commitments in sports (see figure 1)
My paper will show the ethical value in making a decision, right or wrong, that the ultimate result is, I’ll say money. This paper illustrates my opinion in why Harry Stonecipher should have been forced to resign, to save the company name so to say. I’ll talk about the utilitarian and deontological considerations for both parties involved and explain why this decision must have been hard to make.
Introduction Generally, ethics is defined as standards of performance that explain how human beings should opt to react during many circumstances in which they meet with friends, citizens, parents, teachers, children, professionals, and businesspeople, among others. However, ethics is different from feelings, as feelings make significant information’s available for our ethical preferences. Although some people possess highly mature behaviors that cause them to feel awful when they get involved in the wrongdoings, most of the people normally enjoy doing bad things. Ethical decision-making And frequently people will feel uncomfortable when they are mandated to make difficult decisions.