Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Change can be challenging
Change can be challenging
Employee engagement theory literature review
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Change can be challenging
Managing change is an “ongoing process whose objective is to enhance the ability of an organization to participate and respond to developments in its external and internal environments, and to enable employees at all levels to cope with the changes” (Cascio, 2016, p. 6). Change is never easy, but never impossible. It occurs when there is an understanding of the need for change, the vision of where the organization should go, and a commitment to action. Change leaders need to address the question “Why change?” and develop a rationale for the change and a compelling vision of a possible future. “Being dissatisfied with the status quo helps to ready the organization for change” (Cawsey, et al, 2016, p. 106). It is critical to involve every member in the organization, from top to bottom, in the early stage of change to be successful. The goal of the leader is to get each individual to “buy-in” the proposal to get support from …show more content…
The first action is to create a Reward/Recognition Program. This is necessary to get the employees engaged, who can transform a company. They can take customer loyalty to new levels, reduce hiring costs, and improve productivity and product quality. Second, the Employee Training and Development Program is vital to the long-term success of the organization. When carefully planned and properly implemented, the program can provide benefits to both the employees and the organization. Good training and development programs help keep the right people and grow profit. Lastly, Goal Setting & Rewards can entice employees to go beyond their expectations. Difficult goals can lead to higher levels of productivity versus no goals or easy goals. Of course, rewards can also promote productivity, but it has to be appealing. For instance, employee who can produce 50,000 widgets a month will get a paid day off. The reward acts as a motivation
Change affects more than just a program or a process within an organization, change affects employees, collecting data on employee’s readiness and willingness to accept a change will help leaders know if the organization is socially ready for change (Cole, Harris, and Bernerth, 2006). A change might be positive for an organization but if the employees who will be affect by the change are lost in the process then it could create a greater issue than not making the change. Leadership needs to communicate and inspire the employees to be positive toward the change, seeking to enhance their job satisfaction not make changes that will increase their desire to leave. This data is best collected early in the change initiative allowing leadership to properly cast the vision while addressing concerns. This requires leadership to create platforms for employees to engage in the change initiative freely (Ford, 2006). Employee attitudes can be measured through these dialogues providing leadership with necessary measureable data (Hughes, 2007).
Leading Change was named the top management book of the year by Management General. There are three major sections in this book. The first section is ¡§the change of problem and its solution¡¨ ; which discusses why firms fail. The second one is ¡§the eight-stage process¡¨ that deals with methods of performing changes. Lastly, ¡§implications for the twenty-first century¡¨ is discussed as the conclusion. The eight stages of process are as followed: (1) Establishing a sense of urgency. (2) Creating the guiding coalition. (3) Developing a vision and a strategy. (4) Communicating the change of vision. (5) Empowering employees for broad-based action. (6) Generating short-term wins. (7) Consolidating gains and producing more changes. (8) Anchoring new approaches in the culture.
In today’s ever changing world people must adapt to change. If an organization wants to be successful or remain successful they must embrace change. This book helps us identify why people succeed and or fail at large scale change. A lot of companies have a problem with integrating change, The Heart of Change, outlines ways a company can integrate change. The text book Ivanceich’s Organizational Behavior and Kotter and Cohen’s The Heart of Change outlines how change can be a good thing within an organization. The Heart of Change introduces its readers to eight steps the authors feel are important in introducing a large scale organizational change. Today’s organizations have to deal with leadership change, change in the economy,
Change is a double-edged sword (Fullan, 2001). Change is a word that might inspire or put fear into people. Leadership is challenging when it comes to dealing with change and how individuals react within the organization to the change. Marzano, McNulty, and Waters (2005) discuss two orders of change in their book School Leadership that Works; first and second. Fullan (2001) also adds to the discussion in his book Leading in a Culture of Change, with regard to understanding change. In Change Leadership, Keagan and Wagner (2006) discuss many factors of change and the systematic approach to change. Change affects people in different ways. Leaders need to be able to respond to the individuals throughout the change process.
Change is an inevitable function of any organization and is something that employees and leaders alike are bound to face during their careers. According to Ivancevich et al (2011), how leaders are able to handle the task of change can determine the success or failure of an organization. As organizational leadership students, it is important for us to begin to develop and sharpen the necessary skills to innovate and adapt to change effectively. Leaders should be familiar with a variety of elements within the organization including an assessment of employee and leadership strengths, relationships, skill level and capability, level of support, and the types of resources readily available. Assessing these elements prior and during change, as well as evaluating the process after the fact, helps prepare organizations and leaders for future success. The Harvard School of Business’ interactive change management simulation, Change Management Simulation: Power and Influence V2 (2013), was a valuable assignment to help teach us about change from the standpoint of a mid-level management position at Spectrum, a sunglasses company, looking to adopt a new sustainability initiative.
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
In addition to feedback, goals have been found to be more effective when they are tied to employee evaluations. The results of employee evaluations typically carry great weight when it comes to raises, bonuses, and potential advancement. Tying these types of rewards to successful goal completion also improves performance and increases goal commitment among employees (House, 1971). Incorporating deadlines to specific goals is also attributed to elevated performance levels. The motivation levels of the employee increase to meet goals within set deadlines and receive positive feedback (Lunenburg, 2011). As organizations focus on employee satisfaction and motivation, goal setting will remain an important aspect of management practices. In today’s economy, organizations are competing for top talent and ensuring employee satisfaction among job tasks is an important piece of talent retention.
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Just like any other belief or assumption, the leader can specifically pay attention to aspects throughout the organization to support the message that change is necessary and possible. The leader can find ways to include discussing change with subordinates, and consistently highlight where and how the change will improve the organization. Furthermore, the leader can point out deficiencies and reiterate how the change will specifically relate to improvements in the everyday work environment. Paying attention to things that will support shifting the psychological climate, and increase the organization’s overall readiness for change will allow the leader to gain essential buy in from the individuals that will actually have to change their
David Foote (2001) once stated that ‘resistance to change is one of the nastiest, most debilitating workplace cancers.’ It makes sense in a way. The existence of resistance to change means that companies can not be all smooth sailing, which gives enterprise managers or organizers of change a realistic and serious change management task. In this sense, corporate managers must be aware that resistance to change could have a negative effect on the process of change. In order to ensure the smooth progress of the change, enterprises need to properly manage changes, identify the reasons for the formation of resistance to change and adopt the appropriate method to exclude resistances; at the same time, corporate managers should also be noted that resistance to change is not entirely destructive, it can be translated into a positive and constructive factor under a proper management. The existence of resistance to change allows business manag...
As we have learned through our many readings and discussions, leaders have the power to help those around them manage change. They are often the forefront of the push to make a change, and they also have the difficult task of getting others to believe in the change as much as they do. Many leaders may not even realize the power they have to help others deal with change. Often times a leader of an organization or company is able to see the change coming before many of their employees. The most difficult part of facilitating change for leaders is that they must get others to believe in the concept as much as they do.
Reward and recognition has to be promoted for small and large achievements. An effective reward’s program keeps employees engaged, dedicated, and committed to the organization.
Incentive reward engagement offers a win-win situation for the employees and the company. Kelleher believes that incentive is a form of recognition and builds engagement through company’s and employee’s obligations towards a common goal (2014). The company has a “Growth Incentive Scheme” for the production workers. Special monetary incentives are provided should the workers achieve the monthly output target. Through the rewards, employees feel motivated towards their work and thus, contribute towards the company’s
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used
... will continue to be. It is not cheap and often requires trade-offs. It requires a commitment of resources, time, and money. For these and other reasons, change is difficult to initiate and impose. Even after establishing need, developing a plan, and attempting to embed it into the company culture, it can fail. But it is far more likely when those who will implement the change also participate in the development of the change. Internal support is essential to reducing resistance and ensuring success of the plan. Moving forward without this support will only amplify the investment and the difficulty. The change management process mostly focuses on performance and outcome; however, the most important aspect is the attitudes and behaviors of the employees. They can be major obstacles to innovation and change. Constant communication is imperative to successful change.