The credibility tool is composed of three key areas and those are competence, caring, and character. It has been identified that if a person possess and excel in these three areas then your credibility will be a high level. For the record, credibility is your reputation and it is good to sustain a good reputation. In the workplace it is good establish a credible or trustworthy reputation or business relationship and sustain it. This includes showing how much you care about others, your work ethics, and being respectful of others. As leaders the reputation is always that there is no trust between the leaders and the team, so to build and establish credibility with the team is a major role as a business leader (Cardon, P., 2013). Credibility is doing what you or standing behind what you say exclusively in the workplace. It is good to be a genuine or authentic person with a reputation that reflects the same. People are talked about all the time in a leadership role so it is best to live the company’s core values and exemplify integrity on all levels. Build a good team and relationships, strive to be the elite leader while building an elite team, and be transparent with your communication and team development (Mind Tools, 1999-2016). …show more content…
When it comes to being competent that means you possess the knowledge and the technical skills needed to perform the daily tasks. It is also the ability to comprehend and exemplify what you conceived in your job performance. If you lack competence then there are multiple options to obtain what you need. One is by studying and another is on the job training, and repetitive observations. We must focus on the end results following our actions in order to become successful as a team (Cardon, P.,
The role of a leader is often inaccurately defined as an individual who is in a position to give orders. However, there are enormous differences in the attributes of an outstanding leader, and one of mediocrity. An outstanding leader, above all else, is a role model for their peers. In doing so, a leader of the highest caliber is trustworthy in both their peer’s trust for the leader as well as the leader’s trust of their peers. A leader must also display exceptional skill in communication which transcends speaking and, more importantly, includes listening and consideration to the ideas presented to them. Furthermore, a leader must be supportive of and willing to help their peers build their own strengths. The attributes listed above represent only a small subset of what makes an outstanding leader. Yet,
John Maxwell once said, “People buy into the leader before they buy into the vision.” A leader must have a solid foundation as a human being before he can try to pursue the public with his vision. He will be examined from every angle about his leadership traits, style, characteristics, and so forth. All of these areas of leadership come together in what we know as integrity. Integrity is doing what is right morally; it requires honesty, making the “right” decisions for the community, taking the blame, and being selfless.
Internal reputations, authentic leadership, and transparent communication in an organization are all related. Employees who are managed by fair and authentic leaders described their organization more favorably. A positive internal reputation projects more credibility for the organization. Transparent communication helps employees have a better relationship with leaders and in turn, the organization has a better brand and are more trusted by the public (Men, 2014).
Answer: According to Kouzes and Posner people most admire a leader that is, “Honest Forward-looking, Competent, Inspiring” (Kouzes & Posner, 2012, p.33). A leader that is honest is holding to the truth, guiding their people through honest feedback, reviews and advice. These leaders gain trust, respect and cooperation by sharing honest information with all. People want to know that their leaders are looking for future opportunities that will guide the company and drive success for all. Competence breads both respect and confidence. A
They have profound convictions for for their leadership; Their behavior always reflect their core values and they view themselves as individuals that “lead with their hearts as well as their heads while also building enduring organizations” (George 2003). Leaders are encouraged to maintain the perception of authenticity but making sure that their words are consistent and reflect their action or intentions. They should not be so pompous and arrogant that they cannot relate to or find mutual and common ground with their staff. (Goffee & Jones 2005)
Lastly, the key to successful leadership is getting all of one’s followers on their side. In order to achieve this, leaders must gain all their followers trust. Bennis outlines four key elements to gain this trust. Primarily, constancy must be enforced. Leaders must stay the course. Second, congruity is essential. This is so the leaders can “walk the talk.” Third, reliability is needed so that leaders are present when it matters most. Lastly, leaders honor their commitments through integrity. All of these important, aspects gain the trust of their followers by their side.
In an effort to understand the questionnaire, one must first understand the definition of an Authentic Leader. Genuine, trustworthy and reliable are a few words that are interchangeable with the term authentic. Authentic leaders exhibit qualities of confidence, transparency, and high moral standard and are usually very confident (Gardner, Avolio, Luthans, May and Walumbwa, 2005). A person that is considered to be authentic is one who taking account for their behavior and a person who is true to themselves and what they think. A quality of an authentic leader is that he/she exudes the level of authenticity through their actions that encourage others to want to behave the same way. The leader who acts in this manner believes that all individuals have something to contribute to a goal and
To become an authentic leader means to bring “people together around a shared purpose and empowers them to step up and lead authentically in order to create values for all stakeholders,” (xxxi). Bill George has identified the following five dimensions every authentic leader should encompass:
If the company owner of a food produce store says that they are going to create 2,000 jobs in the next year and only creates 10 he or she loses credibility. However, if they follow through and reach or surpass that number, they gain credibility. It takes time, but it is an effective way to gain legitimacy as a leader and have others listen and trust what that leader has to say.
Honesty and integrity are the two most important characteristics for leadership success in any work place. The foundation of any relationship is honesty. To be a good leader, one must be honest. My goal is to create a workplace that every people can trust me and I can trust them so that we work together for a common goal. I would like to be a trusted leader because I am sure this characteristic will bring Done Right and On Time result in my career.
Finally, relationships in the work place and in our personal lives are one of the most important aspects that define us as individuals. Everyone knows how much more can be accomplished in a situation where there is a good working relationship verses the opposite. In a leadership role it is important to have a good understanding of each individual team member. This understanding can include what motivates, what is important, and how the leader can tap into these resources. As each of us progress in our leadership roles, it is important to remember, it’s not all about me. I believe once we accept any type of leadership role, we accept the responsibility to serve others. If we consider it only for personal gain, we will probably not be remembered as a good leader.
Credibility holds significance in a leadership position. According to Kouzes and Posner, the foundation of leadership is the act of credibility (2012). Without credibility, organizations can deteriorate. The lack of credibility in a leadership role creates mistrust and ill feelings towards leaders. These burdens constituents carry, disrupts the organization of being successful. Leaders should full understand credibility. Credibility is earned when leaders set example and commit to their words (Kouzes & Posner, 2012). When credible is present within an organization, constituents are more motivated, committed, and feel a strong sense of team spirit for their company (Kouzes & Posner, 2012).
Research is believed to play a fundamental role in ensuring the progress of mankind. It doesn’t only extend the unexplored boundaries of knowledge, but it also enhances the prosperity and security of mankind as well. Successful basic research, of course requires transparency, open exchange of information and the publication of research results. However, there are also risks associated with freely open and transparent research. Such risks include (Appelbaum et al.
Introduction People always talk about how important it is for companies to have a good leader, someone who not only keeps the blue numbers, but also achieves a loyalty from customers, pleasant working environment, successful business partnerships and ahead of the competition. To exercise effective leadership, the individual must meet certain parameters, which if they are carried out successfully all of them will ensure a long life to the organization. The relationship with partners should be based on trust. Do not just give employees a list of tasks, encourage their views so that their skills might be enhanced for advancement.
Meaning of the Term “Competency” Competency has its origins in the Latin word 'competentia' which means is authoritative to judge as well as ―has the right to speak‖ (Caupin et al., 2006: 9). The English dictionary defines the word ‘competence’ as the state of being suitably sufficient or fit. Trying to draw a fine line between the words such as proficiency, capability, capacity, competence, competency/ competencies is even more difficult and creates confusion (see examples in Byham & Moyer, 2000; Cooper, 2000; Mirabile, 1997). Those who invested efforts in investigativing competency are immediately struck by the lack of uniform definitions, compositions, and methodologies which, of course, lead to misunderstanding, wandering,