Golden Personality Inventory I would say that it's safe to say that the Golden Personality test is rather accurate. I recall my principal quoting me as a "No nonsense type of gal who is probably still wearing her fatigues under her gown." when I graduated in the Michigan Theatre out of T.A. Wilson Academy. That stood true since I was enrolled in Army Junior R.O.T.C my junior year of high school. They have taught me a lot of things that is a big reason of why I am the way I am today. I still remain greateful today for the valuable lessons they have taught me, and I still find myself still abiding by a lot of the ethics that were instilled in me. The quiz mentions practicality, well, practicality is a must. That includes exhausting every avenue …show more content…
I appreciate a smooth flowing, well planned out day in which I can predict, and control. It's not that I'm saying that I'm controlling, I just like to know what's going on, and not be held in the dark on anything. Being traditional is important to me, traditionality to me is a tried, and true, no fail way of doing things. I've been taught in traveling sales that programs don't fail, people do. I don't like to fail at anything, ever. At the same time, successful people fail more than failures do. So I know the more I fail, the more chances I have to …show more content…
When the words “Don’t judge me!” came out of nearly every thirteen year old’s mouth, or some people wear tee shirts that says “Only God can judge me.” Rest assured, I don’t judge like that. My judgments all stem back to decision making. Weather if it’s simple everyday decision making, or making a critical decision that determines the fail, or success of my business. Generally, if it doesn’t make sense, I won’t go for it, and I will question every aspect to death before I come down to a conclusion. I always ask questions based upon who, what, when, where, why, and how. When I get the answers I want, I will form a conclusion. That’s how I tend to judge
The questions were very thought out and not too broad which was an intelligent idea because if you want to achieve specific answers in a personality assessment, there needs to be specific questions. I read a book about the Big Five before this assignment was assigned so while I was taking the test I could partially tell which questions corresponded to which division of the Big Five. Nevertheless, that did not have an impact on how truthful my responses were. If I were to take the test again I do believe that I would get a similar score because I answered honestly and the answers I chose were the ones that represented me the best. I assume that the test would produce results for diverse groups of people as long as the information about gender, age and country were answered correctly. I thought that having a test that compares similar types of people to each other was a brilliant idea for the reason that it could have been too generic if
These traits also describe me very well. Gold personalities are rule followers and like routine. I am definitely the kind of person who likes to follow the rules and a schedule. I hate being late, and often expect others to not be late as well. According to the results, gold’s lead in a stable and organized way. They expect other people to do things the “right” way and almost never question tradition or authority. I feel that this describes the part of me that the blue personality did not describe. I also think the bad day explanation is more accurate to me than the blue one. I tend to get anxious when I am having a bad day as well as getting tired and depressed. It also says that you start getting bad thoughts about yourself and others, while I generally do not get bad thoughts about others I do have bad thoughts about myself on bad
Human assets experts regularly utilize the Big Five identity measurements to help place workers. That is on account of these measurements are thought to be the hidden qualities that make up a singular 's general identity. The "enormous five" are general classes of identity characteristics. While there is a critical collection of writing supporting this five-component model of identity, specialists don 't generally concur on the accurate marks for each one measurement. The Big Five characteristics are Openness, Conscientiousness, Extroversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism:
While taking this test and reading about the information that was provided I was not really surprised about what information was given about my personality. I am 95% of what this test says I am. This exercise helps very little because I arty new 95% of the information is going to give me, it is a good tool to give you that support he would need if you are doubting yourself.
The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:
The Big Five Personality Test provided an interesting account of my personality. Although the majority of the results were accurate, I was surprised by two of the outcomes. According to this test, I am a closed-minded, unmethodical, social butterfly that is well-mannered towards others and composed under pressure (John, 2009). First, the results were completely accurate as I am extremely extroverted. I never meet a stranger, and I carry on conversations with anyone. From the custodian, to the cashier, to a random person on the street, it gives me a great sense of fulfillment to engage in dialogue with others from all walks of life. Second, I agree that I am polite and supportive, especially with family and friends. Overall, I try to always
Personality is defined as a person's differences to another in regards to their patterns of behavior, thinking, and emotional responses (American Psychological Association). The Big Five Personality Traits are Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism, or OCEAN for short. Openness is essentially correlated to exploring new things. The people that have high levels of this trait are generally more apt to do things like try different types of food, be more creative, and have the ability to tackle challenging problems. People who are low on this trait generally have a dislike for change, tend to not enjoy trying new things, and are generally more traditional in a sense..
The bases of this paper will be based on the results that I had obtained when I took the Myers-Briggs personality test. The results that I had obtained was that I was determined to be an ENFJ. I will go into depth about letter and how each represents that a specific aspect of my personality. The results that I had received were not what I had expected, but the more I read about the trait the more I realized how it suited me. I will also talk about the information that I had found useful from the book, Type Talk at Work: How the 16 Personalities Types Determine Your Success on the Job by Otto Kroeger, which gave me insight on how to interact with other personality types especially in the work environment. The information that I absorbed from the personality test and from the book will go into use in my personal and work life so that both environments will be cohesive and peaceful.
INFJs are the least common amongst the Myers-Briggs personality types. Because of this and their multifaceted nature, they are often the most misunderstood. As an INFJ, I intend to clarify some of the more complex aspects of this personality, specifically in the business environment. Through self-awareness, personality tests and various other research; I have found that INFJ’s struggle with certain behavioral paradoxes. One example of this is the strong aversion to large groups of people while portraying a seemingly outgoing, but caring interest in someone’s life. This report provides a brief insight into the INFJ worldview, as well as some new revelations about how to be a better employee through acceptance and conversationVery good
Kroeger, O., Thuesen, J. M., & Rutledge, H. (2002). Type talk at work: How the 16 personality types determine your success on the job. New York, NY: Dell Publishing.
The Myers-Briggs personality test analyzes your personality after answering a series of questions. Resulting from that is four letters. These letters are from eight different personalities and create sixteen combinations. The first being extroversion or introversion. Secondly, either sensing or intuition. Then thinking or feeling. Finally you are perceiving or judging. My results were Extroversion (E), Intuition (N), Thinking (T), and Perceiving (P). For each of those the percentages were 60%, 70%, 80%, and 80%. The reason for this test was to discover my personality and figure out how it could be beneficial. For example, when deciding on a career path knowing what might interest you helps. Also, to prove if this test was accurate in finding out your personality and if others agree with the results. When analyzing these traits for my personality looking at my behavior was important in deciding if it made sense, which almost they all did. The main purpose of this was to discover my personality and how it benefits knowing that.
I found the results of my self-assessments to be a very insightful and accurate description of myself. The results of the learning styles test and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II are very valuable for examining my personality traits and learning style and making improvements as needed.
After taking the Big Five Personality Test I’ve concluded that it is a fairly accurate assessment of my personality. 1) On Openness to Experience/Intellect I ranked at the 53 percentile, with the description that I don’t typically seek out new experiences. I would agree with this assessment. While I am somewhat creative, I am no artist. It takes me more time to do something creative than something analytical, but I do still like to be creative on occasion.
When studying human personality, psychologists may consider different levels of analysis. Personality can be viewed as characteristics typical of human nature and that we are “like all others” (Kluckhohn & Murray, 1953), as humans share the same basic biological components, experiences of development and social interactions. Alternatively, personality can be analysed in terms of individual and group differences, where we are “like some other[s]” (Kluckhohn & Murray, 1953). This approach considers that groups of individuals possess common characteristics, but that characteristics vary between individuals. For example, men are generally more aggressive than women, but one man may be more aggressive in comparison to another man. This level of analysis takes a nomothetic view on personality. Some theorists however may be more interested in individual uniqueness and take an idiographic approach to studying personality.
Taking a personality test is something that I have had to do a few times. First in college while going for my bachelor’s degree in criminal justice, then while attending Airman Leadership School, and finally for this class. Taking these test all three times I have received similar if not the same results so I think that I have answered these truthful each time. Some of the tests that were required for this class were more in depth, taking 82 sub test