Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personality analysis test
Personality assessment reflection
Personality test analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Personality analysis test
According to the IPIP-NEO personality assessment I am average when it comes to extraversion, agreeableness and conscientiousness but, rank low on the neuroticism and openness to experience categories. When I read the title ‘openness’ I assumed that it would mean friendly or something along the lines of that. After I read the description of what openness truly means I was a bit offended at first because I believed the score was telling me that I was not a smart person. As I read deeper into the meaning that the assessment gave I realized that “down to earth, practical, and conservative” (Johnson) were not insults but adjectives that I would have chosen for myself, minus the conservative part. Conservative is not a word that I would ever use for my way of thinking and that one section of openness to experience did not correlate with me. I am not a person who likes to think critically and that may be the reason why I dislike math so much. I refuse to …show more content…
The questions were very thought out and not too broad which was an intelligent idea because if you want to achieve specific answers in a personality assessment, there needs to be specific questions. I read a book about the Big Five before this assignment was assigned so while I was taking the test I could partially tell which questions corresponded to which division of the Big Five. Nevertheless, that did not have an impact on how truthful my responses were. If I were to take the test again I do believe that I would get a similar score because I answered honestly and the answers I chose were the ones that represented me the best. I assume that the test would produce results for diverse groups of people as long as the information about gender, age and country were answered correctly. I thought that having a test that compares similar types of people to each other was a brilliant idea for the reason that it could have been too generic if
Having completed the Myers-Briggs Personality Test previously, I was identified as an INTP, which stands for introverted, intuitive, thinking, and perceiving. Accordingly, this personality is often labeled as “The Architect” or “The Logician.” Despite my previous results, I repeated the test as instructed in the assignment. Consequently, based on the outcome of the test, my personality has altered in the past year. Thus, my updated results based on this analysis were, INTJ (introverted, intuitive, thinking, and judging). However, the two personalities are similar, as only one trait seems to have varied. Therefore, instead of holding a characteristic grounded in perception, it would appear that I am inclined to mannerisms that indicate
The Big Five Personality Test provided an interesting account of my personality. Although the majority of the results were accurate, I was surprised by two of the outcomes. According to this test, I am a closed-minded, unmethodical, social butterfly that is well-mannered towards others and composed under pressure (John, 2009). First, the results were completely accurate as I am extremely extroverted. I never meet a stranger, and I carry on conversations with anyone. From the custodian, to the cashier, to a random person on the street, it gives me a great sense of fulfillment to engage in dialogue with others from all walks of life. Second, I agree that I am polite and supportive, especially with family and friends. Overall, I try to always
Utility of assessment. Why are these types of personality assessments useful? Did you find the results useful? Why or why not?
When I first started to take these personality test, my initial thought was that they would be complicated but they were not at all. Some of the test were a little long, but they were easy to answer. Before I took any of the personality test, I thought that the test would reveal that I was an extrovert, but to my surprise I was wrong. The test revealed that I am actually an introvert, surprisingly. The test that correlated with my personality was the big five personality test in which I compared my answers to those of my husband. Before I took the test I knew that my husband’s personality, compared to mine was totally different. After taking this test I was convinced that as they say, opposites definitely attract. Once I took the test about
Use of the 50-item International Personality Item Pool-Five Factor Model measure (Goldberg, 1999) can be a hindrance for researchers when dealing with participants that are less than enthusiastic about completing long questionnaires. The Mini-IPIP scales was developed specifically for this purpose. This newly developed assessment has been shown equally reliable and valid across the five measures in only 20-items.
I found the results of my self-assessments to be a very insightful and accurate description of myself. The results of the learning styles test and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II are very valuable for examining my personality traits and learning style and making improvements as needed.
f. The questionnaire is useful in measuring personality traits, but should not be the ultimate definer. There were some test-retest and inter-rater discrepancies that were significant enough to question the validity of the questionnaire on some traits, such as emotional stability.The most common feedback was that the rater did not know how to rate some of the statements because it depended on the situation, and thus the rater gave more moderate scores. However, the generality of the questions cannot be avoided since personality is how these traits are exhibited over time and situations.
It exceeded my expectations with accurate results.The test itself was fun to do, I enjoyed picking at my own brain to further understand myself. Though there were some questions I didn't quite understand the context of that could have been explained better. It felt like it was asking real questions and not questions that don't pertain to the subject. For example, a lot of tests that tell you something about yourself online will ask you questions such as “what is your favorite actor”, and these types of questions do not make it seem real and they do not provide any real data to provide for accurate results. However, the test on humanmetrics.com asks a lot of real and personal questions that make you think. The results were the best part, reading a great collection of articles about your personality type almost feels strange at first. You learn that behaviors you thought were solely related to you are in fact experienced by every other person with your personality
The Big Five personality factors are the modern way of describing someone’s feelings, actions, and traits. This new factor map, improving Hans and Sybil Eysenck’s two-dimensional map which consisted of a stable/unstable axis and an introverted/extroverted axis, has five different factors. They are Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism and everyone can be described using these five criteria. This paper will discuss and interpret my results from a Big Five personality test including how accurate I believe it is and how this might change in the future.
The Personality test that I have chosen to critique for this assignment is called “Humanmetric Jung’s Typology Test”. It is an online questionnaire which uses a series of 64 multiple choice questions with a set of scalar options with “uncertain” in the middle to calculate what traits best represent you and by what percent. The four categories tested for in this test were very similar to the five-factor model of personality traits (Krause et al, 2018) and were listed as: extraversion versus introversion, intuition versus sensing, feeling versus thinking and perceiving versus judging.
This was due to the fact that this assessment is a Self-Interview test. Therefore, I could do this same assessment a day or a week from now, but the consistency of my personal answers will be the same or extremely similar every time. The Self- interview intended to measure personality by asking questions that allowed me to describe myself. The questions asked overall measured what the assessment intended to measure. Therefore, the construct validity in this assessment appeared to be highly accurate. This was evaluated by examining the questions in the assessments, such as, “How would you describe your leadership style?" and “What drives you in your personal life?” The degree to which this assessment can be applied to others of a different age, race, and/or gender is generalized highly as well. The structure of this assessment allows other people in other situations to describe themselves like I did. The personal findings of my specific Self- Interview assessment may be generalized to others to a certain extent. This would be due to my age, race, gender, and environmental factors. The norming sample of the people taking this assessment included Texas A&M International University male and female students, with the majority of them being
The test overall did a fairly accurate job in measuring the various factors of my personality. I only disagreed with two of the ten factors, which I merely saw as an overt measurement. The test appeared to be valid for the most part pertaining to my case, and since validity correlates with reliability, its reliability appears to be relatively strong. However this is merely an opinion based on my interpretation of my own personality. It could be equally likely that other people may get many scores in which they totally disagree on. Since this test was written 20 years ago the question of re-standardization also comes into play. As for cross-cultural differences discussed in the introduction, to me it is unclear whether or not the questions are common to all cultures and backgrounds, yet among English speakers the questions seemed well structured. While no test is perfect, the 16 PF does seem to have relatively high reliability and validity, making it ideal in measuring personality traits.
Personality has been part of debate amongst theorists for decades. Many theories have been developed about what human personality is and how it develops. Even after so many years of research and studies, no one definition has been agreed by all theorists. This paper will briefly talk about different aspects of personality and what influence in the development of personality.
Taking a personality test is something that I have had to do a few times. First in college while going for my bachelor’s degree in criminal justice, then while attending Airman Leadership School, and finally for this class. Taking these test all three times I have received similar if not the same results so I think that I have answered these truthful each time. Some of the tests that were required for this class were more in depth, taking 82 sub test
Taking any type of personality test can lead to a lot of thought and reflection on yourself,