Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gallipoli campaign goals and significance
Essay gallipoli campaign
Gallipoli campaign sources of evidence essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gallipoli campaign goals and significance
When dealing with the Gallipoli campaign, there is one question that always comes back again : 'How could this go wrong ?.' Well, over the years, all the facts have sufficiently been studied, but even so there's still an amount of doubt that lingers on.
There was the poor strategical planning of course. Politicians as well as military commanders were so fascinated by the prospect of a new crusade against Constantinople, that dreams were all too often taken for reality. Knocking Turkey out of the war, was a much tougher nut to crack than they could imagine at the time.
Apart from that, there was also a certain amount of bad luck. The fact that the Anzac forces landed at the worst possible spot on the coast of the Peninsula, is generally attributed to mistakes made by the Navy, although that judgment may be a bit harsh as well : under the circumstances, things could go wrong, and when they eventually did, one must admit that misfortune was one of the factors responsible for the outcome.
And then there were a number of tactical blunders. Once the campaign was on, it soon became clear that a number of the military decisions that were taken that were not ideal at all and often had grave consequences. Judging failure in retrospect is easy of course, but what Hunter-Weston did in Helles can hardly be called inspired leadership. And Suvla was a hundred times worse.
Nevertheless, when one starts rereading the history of the campaign, there is always this same strange phenomenon : you can't help feeling that this time things might not go so wrong, that the whole enterprise might succeed after all. Nonsense of course, but still something you can't avoid.
A very partial explanation for this feeling is the fact that you always fall back on the same sources. No matter who tells the story, the entire campaign is always seen from an Allied viewpoint. No matter whether the author the is on the Helles front or at Anzac, you yourself keep looking with him at Achi Baba, you keep hoping for the capture of Chunuk Bair. This approach to the campaign yields of course a twisted view on the reality of those days.
... book to characters in other novels, you begin to see styles of leadership that are used and the effectiveness that they can have on a person’s character and ability to accomplish a mission. I feel as if a constant leadership style was put in charge from the beginning of their deployment that followed the standard that was necessary, then the soldiers would have been unable to commit the crimes they did during their deployment. On the flipside of that coin, I feel as if more competent leaders had existed through the tumultuous time of the deployment, they would have been able to adapt to the situation and control the soldiers they were responsible for no matter how difficult the deployment became. Despite the fact that 11 of 33 original 1st platoon leaders were removed by the end of the deployment a strong leader duo could have prevented the actions that took place.
The theme mateship is proven through the relationship between Frank and Archy and also Frank and his three other friends. In Gallipoli, Peter Weir explores the idea of mateship all throughout the movie. For the duration of the film he uses running to draw Frank and Archy together but also his motion picture is wholly based on the theme of mateship between the two, Archy and Frank. Additionally, mateship is shown not only through Frank and Archy but through Frank and his three friends Barney, Billy and Snowy. This essay will examine these issues to explain how mateship is proven throughout the film.
The soldiers are remembered for maintaining courage and determination under hopeless conditions. The ANZAC legend owes much to wartime correspondents who used the Gallipoli landing to generate a specifically Australian hero. Among the many reports, which reached Australia, were those of Ashmead-Bartlett. His Gallipoli dispatches described Australians as a 'race of athletes ... practical above all', whose cheers, even in death, 'resounded throughout the night'. Ashmead-Bartlett helped in...
The Gallipoli campaign was a military disaster but it is still one of the most important conflicts in which Australia was involved. On 25th April 1915 between 4:30 and 6:30 am the Gallipoli Peninsula was invaded by British, Australian and New Zealand forces. This was to start the long, hard weeks in which the troops were fighting for ground that the enemy controlled in Turkey. They were attempting to gain a supply route to Russia to aid them in repelling the German and Turkish soldiers from their country. I will be discussing the willingness of Australians to volunteer for the war effort and the love and respect they had for their Mother Country, England. I will also discuss how the young, naive soldiers arrived at war not knowing what warfare entailed. They were shocked by the conditions and casualties. I will also discuss the bravery that was shown by the ANZACS in the most dangerous conditions. I will conclude with my reasons of why the Gallipoli campaign holds such value and importance in Australian history and ideology.
The Australian participation in WW2 was similar to that of WW1 in many ways. After the British declared war on Germany on September 3rd 1939, an Australian declaration of war was automatic. Aussie troops were soon sent to different parts of the world to help the British and other allied countries. It was not until late 1941 that they were recalled in order to defend the homefront. Darwin had been suddenly attacked by Japanese planes and small enemy submarines had snuck into Sydney Harbour. Darwin was repeatedly bombed by Japanese planes until July 1941, when along with American troops, the Aussies managed to drive them out of the Solomon Islands and northeastern New Guinea and eliminate a strong Japanese base at Rabaul. Without General MacArthur's troops, the enemy may very well have invaded Australia. This illustrates the importance of alliances.
Wilkinson, Stephan. “The Worst Battlefield Blunders: Five Battles That Ended Badly.” History.net, Weider History Group. Web 30. March 2014.
Gallipoli was released in 1981, developed and filmed in the post-Robert Menzies, post-Vietnam War period when Australia sought to reconsider and artistically represent its post-colonial tension. In a reflection of anxiety about Australia’s so-called national identity, the film is deeply rooted in the local mythology of the nation, and “is redolent with the overt rhetoric of nationalism. The film emerges from a historical period of Australian film-making when funding was newly available for films that dealt with explicitly Australian content and themes”. Gallipoli embodies and projects a now...
in a war which was in no way their own. When there they continued to
The battle of Marathon is one that nearly every historian can recall. Whether do to its Hellenistic nature or the infamous tale that dictates the name of a popular footrace we currently celebrate, the battle itself is of great strategic importance to historians of the militaristic department. The battle is one of the first well documented amphibious landings in written history. The case lends vital information as to the method and the purpose of not only amphibious landings but also the general theme of naval warfare. More specifically the case lends critical information about the strategic importance of foresight, boldness as well as the role that a significant beachhead play’s in amphibious operations. It’s clear to see that when an observer views the information laid out in the case made by Rodgers in his discussion of the battle of Marathon that the role of a beachhead and the lack of boldness on the side of the Persians were the deciding factors in their failure to take Athens and conquer the Greeks.
Patton and Montgomery’s race to capture Messana did more harm than good. The news that the British Eighth Army was credited with having “saved [the American troops] at Salerno” caused outrage among the American troops that were supposedly rescued. (pg 278) In addition, he mentions several instances where the two allies blamed each other when things didn’t go according to plan. Niall points out that after the allied landing at Anzio stalled, Churchill “placed the blame on his allies” the Americans. (Page 294) While it is important to acknowledge that there was a great deal of tension over the way the war was being fought, the problem is that this argument ignores the fact that generals compete even in wars fought without allies. There are numerous examples of generals in the US Civil War who complained of not getting enough credit or stating that they had the situation under control and didn’t need any help. There would have been competition between generals in World War II even if they had come from the same country. The fact that they did come from different countries only made the competition more of a problem as it could cause political
My point is you will be seeing people being overdosed of drugs regardless of age at any festival you go. Fortunately Electric Daisy Carnival is now 18 and up, so for anything that happens to that person, is on them. Although the age requirement is eighteen and up, you can expect a thorough search from the security if you look suspicious. There isn’t any improvement of the drugs, since EDC drugs are widespread and also how for some people the drugs is part of the EDC culture. People might think EDC is the cause of drug overdose. The deaths that have been falsely connected to raves were due to drug overdoses, not because of something the music festival did. These festivals have strict entry pat-downs and searches to check the people who attend if they bring illegal substances. In my opinion Drug use is an individual choice, and the music festivals should not be the blame for the choices that people make in their events once they have done their usual protocol of drug search. One thing you should be concern about if you’re ever going to EDC is the prices. Paying the hotel in Vegas, a ticket to the festival, meals, drinks and transportation makes it expensive, but completely worth it and to be honest it’s a fair price. Tickets are 400 dollars of maximum, but you can get the early bird, which is 375 dollars in total including fee and for VIP its 800 dollars in total. Some hotels you could stay during EDC would be: Circus Circus Las Vegas, Bellagio, The Mirage, Paris Hotel, Delano Las Vegas Hotel and so many more. Most Hotels are 21+ so for the people who aren’t twenty-one, I recommend Bellagio since it’s the best gorgeous hotel I can think of. The food in EDC is expensive as well, but the water is free. EDC allows free water refills at a variety of stations throughout the venue. There are different types varieties of food trucks present
We found out on December 26, 2013, my family and I were in South Carolina visiting family for Christmas and we were about to take a new year’s trip to Florida. At that time we were living in Honduras and I was in 7th grade. I was just a normal kid who enjoyed life living in Honduras, going to a private school and playing tennis every day. Nothing horribly bad had really happened to me yet in my life. Finding out that my dad had Leukemia meant more than just he could die, it meant that life as we knew it would totally change. He was diagnosed with a really rare type of Leukemia that couldn’t be treated in the Honduras, so that meant that we had to move, in the middle of 7th grade. The day my sister and I found out, we went to see him in the hospital. He didn't look too good and was about to start crying. I never thought that from that day on, to enter
A very important question that arises today is whether euthanasia be legal or illegal. Euthanasia is defined as “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (such as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy” (Webster). Doctors, Pastors, and normal day citizens are on both sides of the issue of euthanasia. Euthanasia is currently only legal in the states of Washington, Oregon, California, and Vermont. Through carefully looking at euthanasia, this paper will focus on three reasons euthanasia should be illegal. The following three reasons will be examined as to why euthanasia should be illegal, the power it gives to doctors, alternative treatment, and moral values.
Euthanasia has been an ongoing debate for many years. Everyone has an opinion on why euthanasia should or should not be allowed but, it is as simple as having the choice to die with dignity. If a patient wishes to end his or her life before a disease takes away their quality of life, then the patient should have the option of euthanasia. Although, American society considers euthanasia to be morally wrong euthanasia should be considered respecting a loved one’s wishes. To understand euthanasia, it is important to know the rights humans have at the end of life, that there are acts of passive euthanasia already in practice, and the beneficial aspects.
Many people see death is a bad thing. People don’t like it and they don’t want to hear about it. For many seriously ill and vegetative patients, death is a good thing for them. Death will end their suffering from pains and they can also die with dignity. Euthanasia traditionally means a “good death.” The term has traditionally been used to refer to the hastening of a suffering person’s death or “mercy killing.” The legalization of euthanasia is important for the patient because it would give dying people a choice to determine if they want to fight the disease or end their suffering.