The Difference Between Leadership Vs. Management

850 Words2 Pages

My opinion is the difference I see between the leaders and the managers is that one is revolutionary, an adventurer, explorer and visionary. He opens new doors. The other is more evolutionary, a builder, a grower. He sees what is needed for people to successfully pass through new doors and helps them prepare for it. Both are important. From my perspective, the big picture on leadership is that we humans function best when leadership is a shared function that at times looks like visioning; at times managing; at times encouraging, and leadership is never a one person thing despite the tendency our culture has to focus on the person in charge or the person at the top. The terms management and leadership are often interchanged. …show more content…

Previously, we reserved these characteristics for leaders. While the main focus of management is on efficiency, that doesn 't mean assembly-line mindlessness in today 's world. Modern managers are more like coaches, facilitators or catalysts than assembly line controllers (Center). Both leadership and management are functions but only management is a role. That is, you need to be appointed to a managerial position, but anyone can show leadership regardless of whether they are managers or not. This has a liberating effect, one that makes it clear how front line employees who don 't manage people can show leadership bottom-up. This is crucial in any business that needs everyone thinking in order to beat the competition. When I say that anyone can be a leader, I don 't mean that everyone necessarily has what it takes even to manage a small team, let alone rise to the top. On my definition, showing leadership simply means convincing people to do something different, regardless of your position. Managers tend to adopt impersonal, if not passive, attitudes toward goals. Manager’s goals arise out of necessities rather than desire and, therefore, are deeply embedded in

Open Document