How did historians develop the name "The Dark Ages" for such an evolutional time? Many historians used to call the Middle Ages, "The Dark Ages" because nothing was really known about it, thus being in "the dark". Over time, many people developed theories that the Dark Ages was an intellectually slow and depressive age that is embarrassing to speak about. So, the question arises, Is the Dark Ages an appropriate term to describe the middle ages? An age is called Dark, not on the grounds that the light neglects to sparkle, but rather on the grounds that individuals decline to see it. The Dark Ages is not, what-so-ever, a historically accurate term. I do not feel that it should still be used. As I will soon discuss, Europe and Asia where beginning …show more content…
Doesn't that sound beautiful? If I gave you a book filled with poems about those topics, wouldn't you love to read it? I know I would! In Document D, there is a picture of the Kokin Wakashū Anthology. The Kokin Wakashū Anthology was originally published in 905 A.D, during the "Dark Ages". The anthology reflected the views of many Japanese poets who spoke on behalf of the people in their country. However, nothing was dark about the poems. Every poem spoke of love, travels, and the seasons, things poets write about when filled with bliss. In my analysis, I notice that the style of paper in the book is either stamped or painted with fancy designs and not just blank rice paper. The paper is really a work of art in itself. This writing is very antique. You can tell this because the paper is turning brown from age and looks a little worn down. This shows that the value of such work may be higher than regular writings. Why would something from such a "Dark Age" be so full of value even today? The designs on the paper are painted roundly which to an artist, shows open thoughts and well "roundedness". Even the paper being written on "speaks" …show more content…
According to Document F, an Excerpt for Secondary Source, along with trading goods between countries, religions were also traded. They shared their beliefs among each other, expanding their religion. The geographic locations of Japan, China and Korea definitely contributed to their trade. Being that China and Korea are extremely close to each other, their trade items such as silk, brocades, cotton, tea, etc. were divided amongst each other. Being that Japan was farther from them both, they travelled together to get to the archipelago of Japan for business and trade
Doc. Box 3 mentions confucianism. Rome worships Christianity in the world. Hinduism is technically Buddhism. These reasons explain that trade was never JUST physical items, but ideas and beliefs as well.
During the postclassical period, the expansion of trade had different interpretations around the world. Varying societies all reacted to trade in different ways due to how they viewed the situation. It had caused conflict in few areas around the world and also created peace as well as harm. Some communities had pros and cons to trade, like everything else. Some reasons for the positive or negative feedback on trade was due to religion, and or the philosophical system. Religion and the philosophical system was both pros or cons for trade in different civilizations. Religion helped with the spread of different ideas and religions across a mass area. Yet it had a negative input because then people fought, thinking their religion was more
Documentaries on television have changed quite a lot over time. They used to be good outlets to learn about things, but now they are seen as more of comical piece of entertainment rather than an educational source. The History Channel’s documentary The Dark Ages is no exception. The documentary portrays the early middles ages as a time of death and hunger mixed with religious conflicts, also containing an abnormal amount of bright red objects in an otherwise bleak and monochromatic world. This is contrary to the readings and lectures with descriptions of historical figures and religious affiliations, but similar in its description of the amount of war and hunger in the society.
The time period between 400 CE and 1400 CE wasn’t a “Dark Age” for Europe because of progress in academic success, blossom in architecture, and religious unity along with improvements in government. This time period wasn’t a decay or decline because it didn’t die out but passed on its’ discoveries and interpretation of the world. It may not have been the “best” period in European history but it certainly wasn’t dark and awful as we believe. If it did decline or decay than there would be a different civilization today on that land. Medieval Europe shouldn’t be labeled “Dark” because it had important and fine aspects that made it simply “Medieval Europe”.
The Dark Ages got its name because little was known about the time before The Renaissance. Historians today only call it Dark Ages because information about it is still very limited. During 1883, the American Cyclopedia called the Dark Ages a time where everyone was intellectual and barbaric. In fact, they considered the people during the time to have the worst “intellectual depression” in European history. It represents how they originally thought the Dark Ages were like instead of the new meaning. Modern studies have now shown that there was a lot going on in the Arts and literature.
During the period after the fall of the Roman Empire in the West, Europe experienced a time known as the Dark Ages. During this time period, much of the knowledge that had been learned was lost. Political control was transferred to barbaric invaders, such as the Goths, Vandals, and Huns. These groups destroyed many buildings and artworks that had existed during the time of the Roman Empire. Most people were illiterate, and much of the previously learned knowledge was lost (“Dark Ages”). However, arts and knowledge still flourished in the East.
In the year 476 A.D., Rome officially fell as the greatest and most thriving empire at the time. The time period following this downfall was called the Middle Ages, more infamously recalled as the Dark Ages; but were these years truly as dark as historians say? These medieval times lasted for approximately one thousand years, could such a long time period have been all that dreadful? The answer will soon become clear. The Middle Ages deserved to have the alias of the Dark Ages because there were several severe illnesses, the monarchs were cruel, and the crusades brought the death of many.
...ials, but one could argue the fact that religion was the single most important influence on Korean and Japanese civilizations because most systems of government used religion to legitimize governmental power. Religion brought new forms of poetry and literature as well as new styles of architecture. Many Korean and Japanese monks traveled to China in search of new texts to translate. Agricultural developments improved the economic stability of the countries by providing improved irrigation systems and easier methods of food gathering. The major impacts of Chinese influence on legislation, agriculture, art, literature, and religion were crucial in the nationwide development of Japan through the Heian period and Korea through the period of unification under Silla and helped the countries learn and advance in technology on their own to advance their civilizations.
Obviously, these are only two major elements of the time period so I encourage each and every one to continue to research this exciting era. In a dictionary Entry for “The Dark Ages” taken from Document A, I found that due to the lack of information about the middle ages that over time unfavorable, colorless and misleading views formed from actual historians whose job it is to unearth the truth. For instance, here is a small excerpt from the text of The: "Instead of focusing on the lack of information, historians assumed people and life at that time were “dark.” and as I mentioned in the introduction "Intellectually depressed." In due time numerous documents revealed so much more yet it takes time to erase bias and previously held
The Dark ages is the time between the 500’s and 1400’s. The Dark ages was a time of civil wars, Death, diseases, invasions and thief. There was a lot of invasions and to protect them self from that communities made a code call The code of Chivalry as (Doc 5) states “Europe in the Middle Ages was a dangerous place. Invasions from Muslims, Mongols, Vikings, and other tribal groups were common. War between lords was also common. The value of protection and warriors created a social code called Chivalry. Knights fought for lords and ladies, and lived by a gentleman- warrior code of Chivalry.” And other big thing in The Dark Ages was Diseases. Diseases in the dark ages was deadly because there was not antidote and even Doctors were scared of
The Dark Ages is a name given to Europe during A.D. 500-1400. According to historian Frantz Funck-Brentano from document one, the conditions in Europe were really bad. There was no trade going on, only unceasing terror. This was happening because the Saracen invasions and the Hungarians were swarming over the Eastern provinces. European churches were burned down and then departed with a crowd of captives. In the years 842-846, Anglo-Saxon tells us there was a great slaughter in London, Quentaxic and Rochester. The Northmen stole goods and burned the town Dordrecht in 846 evidenced in document three.
Christianity in Japan spread in various phases. Like many other parts of world, it was brought by religious missionaries and the European traders and invaders. It is almost in middle of the 16th century that the Portuguese traders arrived on the “land of rising sun”. The traders, who landed at Kyushu, brought along gunpowder that was not previously known to the Japanese. The local barons cordially responded to these traders mainly because of the weapons they possessed. The traders were also accompanied by Christian missionaries who were allowed to conduct their religious preaching by the local barons. A large number of Japanese were converted by these missionaries.
The Dark Ages is a better name for the Middle Ages than the Age of Faith because of the Black Death, the many wars and the collapse of the system of government. The Black Death caused death, intense suffering and caused many problems across Europe. War, attacks and invasions were common during the Middle Ages. finally, the system of government crashed. Whilst, many did seek comfort in the church, given the widespread death, suffering and mayhem, I feel that the Dark Ages would be a more appropriate description of these times as there were more disasters than anything in the Middle Ages.
People in the Dark Ages were engulfed in the shadow of greatness of their predecessors, which 18th-century English historian Edward Gibbon called “barbarism and religion,” (History). Life in Europe during the Dark Ages were quite simple, as there was no efforts in unifying Europe, and the Catholic church was the only real body of power in Europe at this time. European societies were governed by feudalism, in which the king gives land to the nobles, while peasants worked on the land to live there in return. Little is actually known about this era, in that nothing significant was recorded, announcing it a “dark’ era. There was little to nothing significant about this time period in Europe, other than strong Catholic authority. A shift begins during this time period
There are a multitude of understandings and interpretations of the concept culture. A common definition may be a, “cumulative deposit of knowledge, experience, beliefs, values, attitudes, meanings, hierarchies, religion, notions of time, roles, spatial relations, concepts of the universe, and material objects and possessions acquired by a group of people in the course of generations through individual and group striving”(Hofstede). An explanation that may be used to discuss the culture of the Middle Ages. Furthermore, it may be used to examine the changes in key aspects, such as, religion, gender roles, and social norms during the time period of approximately the 500s to the 1500s.