Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary devices examinable
Literary devices
Literary elements or techniques
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Steiner kept the complex nature in his story "Return No More" by making appropriate utilization of prolepsis and backstory. Prolepsis in literature is the when the writer mentions a detail at an early time in the story and it portends or foreshadows another subtle element coming towards the end of the story. Whereas, a backstory is the past story of a character and it helps makes the character more complex, unpredictable, interesting and more realistic to the readers. Throughout his story, Steiner had written several details that may seem ordinary but as a matter of fact are interesting, clever and only critical reader succeed in paying attention to. For instance, at the beginning, the writer delineates Falk's "fine, reddish hair," his "deep …show more content…
The symbolized words or phrases have one literal meaning and another profound meaning that readers must figure out for themselves depending on the context. In this story, Steiner once describes a "suitcase, torn at the hinges and lashed with string." Then he further explains about the character by mentioning how "His right leg was dead to the hip." These details are accurate and conceivable, however in the meantime, they mirror Folk's miserable self and distressed mind. The pitcher or milk is also an image or symbol that can be seen in the story. Falk while talking to Mr. Terrenoire says: "It was a blue pitcher and the milk was warm." The color blue as we know usually represents the sky and the ocean, this further makes it represent profundity, strength, and depth. It likewise speaks to reliability, trust, confidence and reality. Thinking more about it warm milk is the first kind of food any human gets. Generally speaking, this pitcher symbolizes Falk's blue and warm love. After burying it, Falk guarantees himself that he is going to come back to find it at the same condition in which he has left it, unbroken, just like his unbroken love. One of the events in the story include a Jewish boy who replies when asked his age: "I am fifteen add a thousand." Realistically speaking the boy was just a day over fifteen. However, that day was equivalent to a thousand …show more content…
Humans think one way yet talk another, feel one way yet expose another and that is incomprehensible complexity by itself. This habit we embrace reveals our multifaceted nature inside. At some point after Falk returns, he lies down on a rigid, stiff bench. Mrs. Terrenoire, even with all the contempt she displays towards her child's executioner, feels sorry for him. Upon seeing him she says: "That bench can't be much good for sleeping… God knows why I'm letting you spend the night here." Another point of interest is when Nicole converses with Falk and discloses to him how "Father had no love for Jean" and how her and jean both "never cared much for each other." It was very obvious that to her and to her father Jean did not matter at all. However, "Danielle howled for days. We couldn't get her to eat or take her dirty clothes off. She adored Jean." By the end of the story, Nicole demands that Falk joins her in a dance. To our surprise, she was actually just driving him to his hopeless demise. Meanwhile, Danielle tries to warn Falk's by pulling his arm and yelling in an attempt to spare him from the threat she has detected. Before any of this happened she tried to take him inside, but he replied by saying "Soon," this is a mystery in itself. Soon was his imagination of Danielle and himself inside and alone, away from all of the burdens, troubles and obstacles. This is all what he has ever wanted and asked
When Marie tries to ask the protagonist to take a walk, this action shows that she is trying to achieve Pauline’s dream by getting her outside of the house. Therefore, she could finally feel the true meaning of freedom. Nevertheless, Pauline’s mother’s response demonstrates that she wants her daughter’s safety more than anything. The mother tries to keep Pauline away from the danger, so the protagonist can at last have a healthier life. However, Agathe’s reply shows that her mother is willing to sacrifice Pauline’s dream to keep her secure.
Perhaps the most evident display of transformation comes in the form of Isabelle’s social and moral evolution which is stimulated by her illicit relationship with Stephen in Part 1 of Faulks’ naturalistic novel. Isabelle’s husband, Azaire is a symbol of the “old wealth” in the Belle Époque era; he is a factory owner and enjoys an important social presence within Amiens: “There would have been no doubt that this was a property of a substantial man”...
Marie had just traveled from her hometown of Ville Rose, where discarding your child made you wicked, to the city of Port-Au-Prince, where children are commonly left on the street. Marie finds a child that she thinks could not be more beautiful, “I thought she was a gift from Heaven when I saw her on the dusty curb, wrapped in a small pink blanket, a few inches away from a sewer as open as a hungry child’s yawn” (79). Marie has suffered many miscarriages, so she takes this child as if it were her own, “I swayed her in my arms like she was and had always been mine” (82). Marie’s hope for a child has paid off, or so it seems. Later, it is revealed that the child is, in fact, dead, and Marie fabricated a story to sanction her hopes and distract her from the harsh reality of her life, “I knew I had to act with her because she was attracting flies and I was keeping her spirit from moving on… She smelled so bad that I couldn’t even bring myself to kiss her without choking on my breath” (85). Her life is thrown back into despair as her cheating husband accuses her of killing children for evil purposes and sends her to
This symbolizes Jeannette and her life. I think the tinkerbelle doll symbolizes Jeannette being lit on fire and also it symbolizes her life and how it keeps falling apart.
Nevertheless, Bertrande knows these self-centred intentions, when put into action, will ultimately be reflected by the displeasure and distress of her children and the Mesnie. ‘I am destroying the happiness of my family. And why? … to free myself from the deceit which was consuming and killing me.’ Bertrande’s strong desire to free herself from the cunning of Arnaud du Tilh inevitably brought considerations of the Mesnie and her children to mind. ‘Her affection for her kindred rose about her in a wall implacable as stone’ as she was ‘condemned to solitude’ knowing the hurt her accusations against Arnaud inflicted upon the mesnie. Furthermore, the drawn out process of the trial brought ‘heart-breaking uncertainty,’ with Lewis clearly indicating through this use of language Bertrande’s awareness of the affect of her actions upon others.
The metaphor the Glass Castle represents is a perfect life that the family cannot have. The dad is a drunk, he has this big plan to build a castle made of gold with a cooling system in the desert. The only thing that makes that metaphor true is that it is impossible, the castle would overheat. Jeanette is important because she is the reason why the dad wants to build the castle, Jeannette is his little “mountain goat”, the child that he is really want to make happy. If he builds this castle they can have a perfect life, that is why he focus so much on trying to improve his prospector.
The struggle to battle with the persistent grief of self-blame and lack of identity is a constant reminder to the barriers in relationships. Leroy grieves over the fact that he has lost his identity as a father and husband. Although he often thinks of Randy, the memories of him have faded. As a result, he latches on to Norma Jean but she doesn’t respond back. This causes him to feel like a failure of a husband. Norma Jean is grieving over the emptiness in her life. It was not the life she thought she would have. Her deceased son symbolizes her emptiness because of his death. She also feels emptiness towards her husband. For example, she feels very uncomfortable around him and always tries to find something for him to do. When Leroy arrives back home from his accident Mason implies, “he thinks she’s seems a little disappointed” (Mason 220), displaying Norma Jean frustrated with his lying around doing nothing but watching television and smoking pot. In addition, Norma Jean feels emptiness towards her mother, which is presented in the way her mother criticizes her. When tragedies occur in a family and self-confidence fades it can take over your life a...
The author starts the essay with an interviewee and adds in the first fragment about V-1 rockets. Then the interviewee's story mixed in with a biology fragment. The author uses this type of fragment to relate to subjects farther down the essay which makes each fragment relate to the content. Fragments that are used help to explain human nature, insides and outsides, everything affected by past, secrets, cause and effect, and development. All of these factors can go with the stories of Heinrich Himmler, Gebhard (Dad of Himmler), Laura (story in beginning), Heinz, Wernher von Braun (rocket scientist), Helene (author met at Metro station), and Leo. The author also uses examples of homosexuality, torture, child-rearing practices, parents/family, and also relates it with the stories and the fragments. Knowing that this essay has a lot of subjects that the author writes on, can make this piece seem confusing. Knowing that all of the issues will be tied together in some way, makes the essay more understandable. To use an example to tie together the fragments one can see that V-1 rockets are potentially destructive, complex, conveys images of strength, outcome unpredictable, inside guides outside, and that it has a target or destination which shows that in some way each fragment can relate to torture, human nature, cause and effect, parents and family, and many others. For example, Himmler is complex, conveys images of strength, his outcome is unpredictable, and he is potentially dangerous to the jews. In some way, all of the topics are put together with the fragments. To use another example to connect the fragments one can see that cells and DNA are used to show development through the book.
They both are thought to be a freak or crazy, as they do not fit the normality. As Marie-Laure is blind, and Etienne has agoraphobia and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, or PTSD. They both lost someone that was important to them in a world war. Etienne lost his brother during World War I, and Marie-Laure lost her father during World War II. They fell broken because of the one person that understood them and that was there for them was gone and they did not know how to handle it because they when though everything together. As the story goes on you get to see Etienne’s and Marie-Laure’s relationship get strong and they began to mend the damage, and become support systems for each
Justine, too, is an ‘idealised figure’, described during the trial as having a countenance which, ‘always engaging, was rendered, by the solemnity of her feelings, exquisitely beautiful.’ She is the archetypal innocent, being beautiful, weak and entirely accepting of her fate to the point of martyrdom.
In conclusion, it is hard to grasp the true meaning of the story unless the story is read a second time because of the author's style of writing.
Antoine is always home alone after school. The director establishes this by pulling away to long shots demonstrating the empty apartment. The police station scene were Antoine’s father is talking to the warden, demonstrates a relaxed calm father recommending that his son should be placed in a correction facility. Truffaut uses medium shots jumping between views of characters as they speak, allowing the viewer to ingest the unusually relaxed nature of a very serious situation. Georges Sadoul, French journalist and cinema writer, summarizes it articulately when he stated “Do his parents love him? They don’t understand him because they lack affection or lack time.” Through jump shots and different lengths shots Truffaut demonstrates the neglect of Antoine by his
...ch as time, dates, and the exact relationships between the different characters are is not spelled out. This active involvement of the viewer is necessary for the work of art to stand on its own. This takes the challenge thrown out by modernists to reject easy conventions and make new ones, and pushes it further to the point where conventions become a joke. Those who understand the references get the joke, and this creates a new kind of meaning beyond the surface meaning of the narrative.
However not every crime is committed for a bad intent, some people, such as Jean Valjean, stole because he had no money to feed his starving niece and nephew. Despite being only a petty crime that Jean Valjean commits to save children, Javert fuels his hate of criminals, and throws him in prison for his crime. Javert lacks compassion and understanding of people’s situation to fulfill his demented idea of the law. Not only does Javert’s hate come from Jean Valjean and him stealing, but also Fantine a poor struggling girl, who just needs help. Fantine, a single-mother, sent her child to live with innkeepers in another city, while she tries to earn money to send to her.
From the second he was arrested to the moment he died, Valjean’s past haunted his soul. Valjean’s nightmare began with his arrest, which occurred simply due to his stealing of bread to feed his poverty-stricken family. After many years of sweat and labor, not to mention countless escape attempts, he was released from prison, hoping that he may now start his life anew. However, the moment he pleaded for lodging, everyone’s reply was the same, “‘Monsieur... I cannot receive you’” as they knew he was an ex-convict (Hugo, 5).