Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rousseau's views on human nature
Prejudice and discrimination in society
Impact of social class
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rousseau's views on human nature
Manipulating the minds of the masses, societal prejudice is one of the most commanding forces this world has to offer. Unfortunately, the method by which prejudice controls is making a victim’s life so unbearable, they simply must find a way to change. Art and literature take this abstract and formulate it into a readable, breathable form. Specifically, the masterpiece that is Les Misérables embodies that detrimental social construct in the appearance of forlorn souls. Harmoniously crafting the milieu of 19th-century France in literature, Victor Hugo was able to stirringly depict the abstract of suffering and bitter persecution of the disenfranchised to inspire understanding to those more fortunate.
Thrust into a hellish pit of her own despair,
…show more content…
His case was one of utmost peculiarity, as he was seemingly a character with one of the most bizarre stories. Carefree, Thénardier managed to survive in the lowest of social classes through his utter flexibility and cunning nature. So caught up in his own avaricious ways, he became incapable of charity for humanity. However the most striking aspect of his journey is that he once was a war soldier, selfless and solicitous, even saving the life of Marius’ father on the battlefield. In fact, when Marius discovered Thénardier’s construct flaw, he remarked to himself, “This man...was a monster!” and thought it strange the contrasting personas. How can a man, formerly good, be twisted into such a crooked creature as to elicit money from a helpless Fantine through her poor child? Jean Jacques Rousseau elaborates on this thought process as he theorizes, “modern man’s enslavement to his own needs is responsible for all sorts of societal ills, from exploitation and domination of others to poor self-esteem and depression” (Rousseau). In short, society naturally possesses detrimental power over man. Through society’s intolerant ways, Thénardier was driven to the “point when the unfortunate and the infamous are associated and confused in a word, a mortal word, les misérables” (Hugo 205). His lack of fortune forced him to become …show more content…
From the second he was arrested to the moment he died, Valjean’s past haunted his soul. Valjean’s nightmare began with his arrest, which occurred simply due to his stealing of bread to feed his poverty-stricken family. After many years of sweat and labor, not to mention countless escape attempts, he was released from prison, hoping that he may now start his life anew. However, the moment he pleaded for lodging, everyone’s reply was the same, “‘Monsieur...I cannot receive you’” as they knew he was an ex-convict (Hugo, 5). Not one person dared to stop and think that maybe he was a changed man, maybe his morals had always been uncorrupted. By including this in his novel, Hugo conveys to us the wrong in judging people based on their past. The past does not define present human nature. Rather, it shapes and molds, allowing for growth and learning. Unfortunately, Valjean’s dejection did not stop there. His entire life was spent hiding from the world, forced to live the life of a trapped animal despite the kindness he spread. But it is not his being that people despised, it was plainly the name they associated with it: prisoner number 24601. As Valjean shuffled through the many identities and names he took upon himself, many, if not most, led him to be known as a well-respected and gracious man. Still, the police chased after the man they only knew as a dirty
Meursault is a fairly average individual who is distinctive more in his apathy and passive pessimism than in anything else. He rarely talks because he generally has nothing to say, and he does what is requested of him because he feels that resisting commands is more of a bother than it is worth. Meursault never did anything notable or distinctive in his life: a fact which makes the events of the book all the more intriguing.
Every character that revolves around Meursault seems to be in direct contrast to him. Meursault is an amoral person who does not seem to care passionately about anything. He acts in accordance with physical desires. In other words, Meursault is a sensualist person. At this particular time in his life, his path crosses with his neighbor, Raymond, who feels as though his girlfriend is cheating on him. He decides to take revenge with minor aid form Meursault. Meursault helps him only because he thinks he has nothing to lose if he does. As things lead into one another, the first major violent act of the book is committed.
By the end of Meursault is imprisoned somewhere he has always mentally and emotionally been. Being isolated make him act as a stranger even more. The title describes a strange person.
...iod when Camus writes this novel. Camus obviously knew the time period and explored different ideas and philosophies about pointless of life in people which comes out in his character, Meursault. In prison Meursualt also realizes that he’s trapped, and there’s no way out as he remembers what the nurse once said to him. His growth in self reflection results in unimportance of emotional values of life and help focus what’s directly ahead of him. This significant change results him in understanding himself and his voice, and figuring out his capabilities and philosophies. Time spent in prison helps Meursault finally understands himself, the meaninglessness of life, and the unimportance of time which shows the shift in the character after sent to prison.
...according to him, a man who is morally guilty of killing his mother severs himself from society in the same way as a man who raises a murderous hand against the father who begat him.” This quote is telling how society input their feelings and ideas onto Meursault. The persecutor compares Meursault emotionless and lack on remorse for his killing the same as a person killing their own father. Society believes Meursault as an emotionless killer or a stranger to society’s morality, Meursault then can’t explain why he couldn’t feel any emotion, drives, or thoughts of remorse for his murder. Lastly, when the chaplain visits Meursault against his wishes, this scene showed how society expects everyone to ask for forgiveness from god when near death. Meursault then thinks it is absurd and refused to believe in him because he says it’s ridiculous and there’s no time at all.
Firstly, Camus juxtaposes the stories of Meursault and the Czechoslovakian man to create a presage of the denouement of Meursault. The Czechoslovakian man undergoes major life changes, and this ultimately leads to his demise. He goes to make a better life for himself, and he returns to his village with riches in wealth and in family. Unrecognizable to them, the Czechoslovakian man returns to his mother and sister, and he decides to play a simple joke “of taking a room” and “he had shown off his money” (80). This trick ends when “during the night his mother and sister had beaten him to death…in order to rob him” (80). The Czechoslovakian man’s newfound courage results in obstinacy. Contrastingly, until Meursault commits his crime of murder, his life appears nearly painfully simple. ...
The Stranger, a novel written by Albert Camus shows a world were being authentic is impossible. Meursault, the main character, is a strange person from the point of view of society and at the end of the book he is sentenced to death “for killing an Arab.” The society that judges Meursault as a stranger is the representation of our world, and Meursault is a person who tries to live his live following what he thinks is important in life; he is authentic. Meursault lives in a world really different from the real world. At the end of the book it is seen how the prosecutor, a “lawyer” of the state, defines Meursault as a person that is very different from the rest of society. The reason why Meursault is different from the rest of the world is that he doesn’t have the same ideals than society, and the things that society things are important Meursault considers them as unimportant. By having different reasons to live life, Meursault lives separated from society; he lives in a separate world. At the end of the book Meursault is obligated to come to reality. The judgment of Meursault let us see the impossibility of the. Meursault is not only himself but also a representation of the people how try to be different, and the prosecutor and the rest of the society are a reflection of our own world. The whole book is a reflection of our world.
First off, is the element of forgiveness. In a book of mistrust, poverty, and hate…forgiveness thrives in the world of Les Miserables. The first example of this was at the very beginning, when Jean Valjean stayed with the bishop. Valjean stole his silver…and ran off. He ends up being caught by police, but when the police questioned the bishop, he claimed to have given the silver to Valjean. Jean was confused…and the bishop claimed that with the silver, he had purchased the convicts soul, and had given it to God, and from that day forward, Valjean must be a good man. Another example of forgiveness goes two ways. Javert, in his relentless pursuit of Valjean, is captured by revolutionaries. In reward for saving the lives of a few of these revolutionaries, Valjean asks for, and gets, permission to take Javert outside, and kill him. Once outside, a small monologue occurs…and Valjean releases Javert, and lets him go free. Valjean just wanted to be left alone in peace, and hoped this act of kindness would change Javert, and make him realize that Valjean was no longer the man he was. The second way…is that in the end, after Javert finally captures Valjean, he lets him go. Since Javert had broken the law… that he loved so dearly, he kills himself shortly thereafter, by jumping into a river.
Several people in Jean Valjeans life allow him to rediscover the meaning of love. The good bishop is the one responsible for initiating this rediscovery. Jean Valjean's new life begins when the bishop utters the words, “Jean Valjean, my brother, you belong no longer to evil, but to good. It is your soul that I am buying for you. I withdraw it from dark thoughts and from the spirit of perdition, and I give it to God!” (30). This opens Jean Valjean to the good of the world and allows him to immerse himself in the love Cosette offers him, something he couldn't do without the help of the bishop. The bishop assists Jean Valjean in seeing that there are people who will help him despite his rocky background. This creates a reason for Jean Valjean to act on the experience to rebuild his life and become an honest man. This change of heart helps him feel the love that Cosette displays for him, which he has never known. He slowly begins to love and care f...
The relationship shared by Pierre and Helene is best described as a lustful charade. It is no coincidence that Pierre, one of the most introspective characters in the novel, first marries a shallow, inwardly-ugly adulterer. His first recorded attitude towards Helene is one of admira...
All humans have different morals that change based on their environment and circumstance. Jean Valjean, in the novel Les Miserables(1961), changes from someone with confused morals to a man with more morals than most whom with respect learns to love and share.
This paper will have a detailed discussion on the shareholder theory of Milton Friedman and the stakeholder theory of Edward Freeman. Friedman argued that “neo-classical economic theory suggests that the purpose of the organisations is to make profits in their accountability to themselves and their shareholders and that only by doing so can business contribute to wealth for itself and society at large”. On the other hand, the theory of stakeholder suggests that the managers of an organisation do not only have the duty towards the firm’s shareholders; rather towards the individuals and constituencies who contribute to the company’s wealth, capacity and activities. These individuals or constituencies can be the shareholders, employees, customers, local community and the suppliers (Freeman 1984 pp. 409–421).
But in the novel, the main character, Meursault, does not show any emotion to his mother’s death. Meursault was not moral, but he was not immoral either. It is because he lacks any emotional feelings. He is detached from the world and he is seen by society as an outcast because of the way he acts. Meursault’s personality can be described as dull and boring.
In The Stranger, Camus portrays women as unnecessary beings created purely to serve materialistically and satisfy males through the lack of a deep, meaningful, relationship between Meursault and females. Throughout the text, the main character, Meursault, creates closer, more meaningful relationships with other minor characters in the story. However, in his interactions with females in this book, Meursault’s thoughts and actions center on himself and his physical desires, observations, and feelings, rather than devoting his attention to the actual female. Living in Algiers in the 1960s, Meursault originates from a post-modernist time of the decline in emotion. Meursault simply defies the social expectations and societal ‘rules’, as post-modernists viewed the world. Rather than living as one gear in the ‘machine’ of society, Meursault defies this unwritten law in the lackluster relationships between he and other females, as well as his seemingly blissful eye to society itself. In The Stranger, males, not females, truly bring out the side of Meursault that has the capacity for compassion and a general, mutual feeling relationship. For example, Marie and Meursault’s relationship only demonstrate Meursault’s lack of an emotional appetite for her. Also, with the death of Maman, Meursault remains virtually unchanged in his thoughts and desires.
In “On Cruelty,” Montaigne argues that stifling temptations and vices do not create more virtue because resisting temptations may make man “innocent” from doing ill, “but not one apt for doing good.” . He adds that some traits, such as prudence and bravery, may simply come from less-desirable traits, such as cowardliness and greed. Indeed, Montaigne traces his good character to his fortune and family background, rather than is one of his own making. However, he adds that he can “unlearn evil” by mortally hating vices and he lists cruelty as the greatest vice of all. For Montaigne, cruelty is more than just a mean act.