Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Human factors causes in aviation accidents
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Colgan Air Flight 3407 was a very interesting case to look at. On February 12, 2009, at 10:17 pm, flight 3407 crashed at a house in New York after the pilots experience a stall. Flight 3407 was scheduled to fly from Newark, New Jersey to Buffalo, New York. The NTSB reported the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) revealed some discrepancies both pilots were experience. The first officer did not have any experience with icing condition but icing was one of the reasons the plane went into a stall. On the other hand, the captain had some experience flying in icing condition. The captain was experiencing fatigue, which indeed, made him unfit to recover from a stall. With that in mind, the Human Factor Analysis Classification System (HFACS) will give insight of some errors both pilots made.
According to “A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis…”, both authors stated that HFACS was developed based off from the Swiss Cheese model to provide a tool to assist in the investigation process to identify the probable human cause (Wiegmann and Shappell, 2003). Moreover, the HFACS is broken down into four categories to identify the failure occur. In other words, leading up to adverse events the HFACS will identify the type error occur.
The first HFACS is unsafe acts. Unsafe act begin at level one and it is divided into two catergories, errors and violation. While errors are based on skills, decision and perceptual errors the violation focuses on routine and exceptional violations. As to Colgan Air flight 3407, the unsafe act elements both pilots acted on were skill-based and decision errors. The skill-based errors were occurring when the crew failed to pay attention to their airspeed and the captain also failed to try recover from a stall. For the decision error, the co-pilot had discovered icing on the wings but failed to mention how serious it was.
The next level is Precondition for Unsafe Acts. Precondition begins at level two and it is dividing into environmental factors, condition of operator, and personnel factors. In regards to Flight 3407, the environmental factors would be the weather condition. Icing was a factor when occurred on the wings. Both pilots were experiencing fatigue during their flight. They have pushed their body to limits where as their reaction times were not fully functional. Furthermore, due to fatigues and not adequate situational awareness, the crew did not perform to their best optimal on the job.
Give a brief summary of the reading. What event was it describing and how was it analyzing that event?
Lack of proper risk management process: NASA was using a simple risk classification system and the methods used were only qualitative. There was a lack of proper technical and quantitative risk management methods that could have helped them identify the risks and eliminate them.
Though a rarity, every once in awhile, planes tend to crash and have serious issues due to problems that could have easily been avoided(183). In the novel the Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell, he explains why planes crash and how it can be prevented. He began this explanation by evaluating different plane crashes from airlines basing from Colombia and Korea. In both events, a series of miniature problems and lack of communication was a cause from the catastrophic events that follow. In the case of the Colombian airlines, the already 14 hours and 40-minute flight(Flight Time) was interrupted by a woman having a stroke causing them to land. Since they did not burn all their fuel, they had to “land heavy” or overweight making the landing much more
Pinnacle Airlines flight 3701 was a repositioning flight of an empty CRJ-200 from Little Rock National Airport to Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. The flight took place on October 14, 2004. The flight was led by captain Jesse Rhodes and first officer Peter Cesarz. Each of the pilots received training at the Gulfstream Academy and flew for Gulfstream International Airlines prior to working for Pinnacle Airlines. Jesse Rhodes, the captain age thirty-one, had over 6,900 hours while the first officer, age twenty-three, had only 761 hours of flight time. The pilots on this flight did not adhere to SOP’s and flew the aircraft to its maximum performance capabilities. (Thesis) The accident occurred due to the unprofessional behavior of the pilots’, their failure to properly report and prepare for an emergency landing and improper management of the double engine failure checklist.
...ion’s rules and regulation in order to preserve and protect it jobs of the pilots from the FAA and the NTSB. Aviation crashes are very rare of aircraft travel. But it all depends on the pilot and its flying performance of the plane. In case if the pilot is called for a hearing in a court room or an FAA hearing in Washington D.C headquarters of the FAA and the NTSB. According to the Pilots rules and regulations of the union it is important to know the defendants questions when asked upon an hearing.
In conclusion, many contribution factors led to the Crossair flight 3597 crash but is mainly triggered by Crossair’s incapability of assessment, pilot error and lastly the air traffic controller. Analysis of a flight crash is important so that we will know the causes, thus being able tackle it, making sure that there are no other flight crashes like Crossair flight 3597.
United States of America. Department of Transportation. FAA. Human Error and Commercial Aviation Accidents: A Comprehensive, Fine-Grained Analysis Using HFACS. FAA, July 2006. Web. 22 Mar. 2014. .
Safety in the ethics and industry of aerospace technology is of prime importance for preventing tragic malfunctions and crashes. Opposed to automobiles for example, if an airplane breaks down while in mid-flight, it has nowhere to go but down. And sadly it will often go down “hard” and with a high probability of killing people. The Engineering Code of Ethics states first and foremost that, “Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public.” In the aerospace industry, this as well holds very true, both in manufacturing and in air safety itself. Airline safety has recently become a much-debated topic, although arguments over air safety and travel have been going ...
It was the afternoon of July 25, 2000. One hundred passengers, most of them German, boarded the Concorde Air France Flight 4590. This was a trip of a lifetime for many people, as Concorde was restricted to the wealthy class of people. The excitement in people was cut short by the unfortunate delay in flight, because of maintenance in one of its engines. The passengers boarded the plane a couple of hours after the scheduled time. Finally, it was cleared for taxi on runway 26-Right. The pilots lined the aircraft parallel to the runway. A tragic accident, however, was about to befall.
These three sub priorities are set in stone for how and when an air traffic controller must control aircraft. Paragraph 2-1-2 of the J.O 7110.65V states the duty priority of a controller by their main objective and other obligations; an air traffic controller’s duty priority is to “Give first priority to separating aircraft and issuing safety alerts as required in this order. Good judgment must be used in prioritizing all other provisions of this order based on the requirements of the situation at hand.” This paragraph of the J.O 7110.65V can give insight to many legal debates for when an air traffic controller is under scrutiny for an incident or accident of an aircraft. Duty priority is mainly important due to the fact that by taking an incident or accident the judge or counsel can see if the controller was acting under prescribed duty priority and if the controller had a higher priority at hand. The next sub priority of a controller is procedural preference. Explained in paragraph 2-1-3 of the 7110.65V the procedural preference of a controller is to one, use automation in preference to non-automation, two, use radar separation in preference to non-radar separation and three, to use non-radar separation in preference to radar separation when a operational advantage is to be gained. Procedural
In several studies of aviation mishaps, human error has been cited as the primary cause of the majority of these mishaps. The main problems of these human errors were failures in interpersonal communication, leadership, and decision making in the flight deck (or cockpit). With this in mind and the need to improve on air safety, Crew Resource Management was developed. We will define CRM and then continue further to define subsequent automations and questionnaires that have developed through CRM. We will discuss the importance of CRM, automations, and questionnaires and the research findings.
When I stepped into the large neatly organized white polished plane, I never though something would go wrong. I woke up and found myself on an extremely hot bright sunny desert island filled with shiny soft bright green palm trees containing rough bright yellow hard felt juicy apples. The simple strong plane I was in earlier shattered into little pieces of broken glass and metal when crashing onto the wet slimy coffee colored sand and burning with red orange colored flames. After my realization to this heart throbbing incident I began to run pressing my eight inch footsteps into the wet squishy slimy light brown sand looking in every direction with my wide open eyes filled with confusion in search of other survivors. After finding four other survivors we began moving our small petite weak legs fifty inches from the painful incident. Reaching our destination which was a tiny space filled with dark shade blocking the extreme heat coming from the bright blue sky, I felt my eyelids slowly moving down my light colored hazel eyes and found myself in a dream. I was awakened the next day from a grumbling noise coming from my empty stomach.
Question 1: Air Crash Investigations is a television series, which airs on National Geographic. Air Crash Investigations depicts air traffic accidents that have occurred in the past and the happenings that led to the air crash. The television series content contains a number of air disasters and air disasters that almost happened. The series contains eyewitness accounts and the investigations into the air crashes and near misses conducted by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). The series reconstructs the disasters as they happened with the use of computer animations and mock scenarios. The series incorporates interviews with people that survived the air crashes and other people that might have been involved in the air accident.
On the evening of January 10th, 2000, Crossair (Crossair at the time before the transition to Swissair) Flight 498, a two-turboprop Saab 340B aircraft, took off from Zurich, Switzerland enroute to Dresden, Germany carrying seven passengers and three crew members. Taxi, takeoff and climb went normally until roughly two minutes into the flight ATC began to notice the aircraft was losing altitude and banking right when the aircraft was directed by ATC to turn left. Moments later ATC lost contact with the aircraft. In an after accident report created by Swiss AAIB, it was determined that the cause of the accident was contributed to pilot error through many factors that include the PIC activating the autopilot under IFR conditions and during the climb phase, the PIC had lost spatial orientation and increased the right bank dive, as well as the copilot’s failure to assist the PIC in dive prevention and recovery. In addition, the PIC was under the influence of a strong sedative (ASN Aircraft Accident, 2000). Based on these findings the PIC failed to comply with the commander responsibilities found under EASA Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012, CAT.GEN.MPA.105.
The most common reasons why planes crash are because of pilot error. Over fifty percent of plane crashes are caused by pilots making mistakes. No one mistake or fault can cause commercial airlines, private airplanes, military aircrafts, and private and non private helicopters to crash. When an error occurs during a flight, pilots end up making another seven more errors on top of the other one before the plane crashes. All of the passenger planes have two pilots and they are supposed to go over each others responsibilities that keep the plane flying. Often times, one pilot makes a mistake and the other pilot doesn’t catch it. For example, a flight to Tokyo crashed in 1987 because a pilot who was known to have serious psychological problems put the plane’s engines into reverse in the middle of the flight. Before a person is allowed to start and finish schooling for becoming a legal pilot, they should be tested for drugs and any mental problems that could cause a crash to happen.